The URL can be used to link to this page

DepoeBay.pdf� _ � �� *. �i �'� x �'� � �,n �' �. .„�� ,� �-;. � � �la g s�' � x �z'a v� m� ;� '� �<,3 •° m �e �"�+ `• w �. �S � • 4'''?? � . s '� = e ^ "'a ° ; ' � -�, �I., m "s � .�g � .. �, �',, d � � ~ , � � a g ° -� (Streams, Wetlands, l�iparian �reas, Forest Lands, Wildlife Habitat, Shoreline, and Open Space Areas) ��a �� City of Depoe Bay, Oregon Pa�epared by 0 APPROVED WETLANDS � ��on Department of St�te � ��5 L�� w�h�� J�v�� - p�te �vl -20o Approvedby �GtvteflM�/lar�i Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Wilsonville, Oregon December 2003 PHS r' � �� - .�. x �r� � �� :� • �: �.m = :.� ,_ ,. ,� - r, � - - , � `� a. c 'g - _ .� _ ., �, ��. '_ � 4 � a a , - - - � � �?; ' �� ,6 - � � - � .� � - � � - � �"� (Streams, Wetlands,lZiparian Areas, Forest Lands, Wildlife I�abitat Shoreline, and C�pen Space Areas) Ppepamed for City of Depoe Bay PO Box 8 570 SE Shell Street Depoe Bay, Oregon 97341 ; ) Preparecl by John van Staveren Fred Small Caroline Rim Shawn Eisner Michele Eccleston Heather Arndt Pacific �abitat Services, �nc. 9450 SW Commerce Circle, Suite 180 Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (S03) 570-0800 (503) 570-0855 FAX PHS Project Number: 2853 December 2003 Surn�ary of Depoe �ay Tax L„ots wi�h VVetlancls i We�l�nd Y,ocation '�'ax I,ot(s) '- ;Cmde s) NDB-1 09-11-OS-B 1109 09-11-OS 200 � 09-11-OS-DC 6900 NDB-2 09-11-OS-DD 105, 300, 301 09-11-08-AA 403 09-11-08-AB 100, 400 9-11-OS-DC 900, 1000, 1102, 1400, 1500, 1600, � 3 1700, 1800, 4000 09-11-08-AB 4800, 5600, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100, 6200 09-11-08 101 SDB-1 09-11-08-AA 2000, 3000 09-11-08-AC 942 SDB-2 09-11-08 101 09-11-08-AC 200, 942 09-11-08-CA 4201, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800 WC-la 09-11-08-CC 128 09-11-08-CD 300 � WC-lb 09-11-08-CC 128 09-11-08-CD 300 WC-2 09-11-08-CC 90000 WC-3 09-11-07-DD 401, 402, 2800, 3800, 3900, 4000 09-11-08-CC 102, 118, 119, 121, 122, 9000 09-11-17-BB 2400, 2500, 2600, 4104 WC-4 09-11-17-BC 700, 800, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3201, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3700, 7600 WC-5 09-11-17-BC 230, 4600, 4700, 4800, 7500, 7600 09-11-18-AD 800 WC-6a 09-11-17-CB 400 WC-6b 09-11-17-CB 400 WC-7 09-11-18-AA 1900, 2900, 3000, 3100 09-11-OS-B 1109 Other Wetlands 09-11-08-CC 113, 114, 116, 130, 608 (<0.5 acres) 09-11-17-BB 107, 1305 � 09-11-17-BC 600, 700 09-11-17-CB 400 i :. � ;�; �; ;_�.,. Pa�e 1.0 IN'I'I20I)TJCTION ..........................................................................................................1 1.1 Report Format ........................................................................:...........................:... 1 2A I)E�'�1VI�'�ONS ...........................................................................................................:... 2 � �� '� I �� 'i .� �1 1 � ; �� , , 3.1 Public Involvement ................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Local Wetlands Inventory Methodology ............................................................... 8 3.2.1 Routine Off-site Determination ................................................................. 8 3.2.2 Routine On-site Deteimixiation .................................................................. 8 3.3 Wetland Quality Assessment ................................................................................. 9 3.3.1 The Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology ..................... 9 3.3.2 Wetlands of Special Interest for Protection ............................................. 10 3.3.3 Field Methodology ................................................................................... 10 3.3.4 Office Assessment ................................................................................... 10 3.4 Riparian Inventory :.............................................................................................. 11 3.4.1 Urban Riparian Inventory and Assessment Guide ................................... 11 , 3.4.2 Riparian Assessment ................................................................................ 12 3.4.3 Riparian Functions ................................................................................... 12 3.5 Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................................... 13 4.0 CA�tTOGRAP� ........................................................................................................14 � � , . � . ,. �.; • . � �; ;:�;� , � � '.�� -'_-��' 5.1 Geologic Setting ..........................:.......................................................................15 5.2 Topography ..........................................................................................................15 5.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................................ 16 5.3.1 Hydrologic Features of the Depoe Bay Study Area ................................. 16 5.3.2 Hydrologic Basin Designation ......................................:.......................... 16 5.3:3 Hydrologic Indicators .............................................................................. 17 5.4 Soils .................................................................................................................17 5.5 Vegetation ............................................................................................................18 5.5.1 Vegetation Overview ............................................................................... 18 5.5.2 Local Vegetation Communities ............................................................... 18 5.5.3 Wetland and Upland Indicator Species .................................................... 20 5.6 Wildlife .................................................................................................................20 5.6.1 Threatened and Endangered Species ....................................................... 20 5.6.2 Other Wildlife Habitat . ............................................................................ 22 5.6.3 Managed Wildlife Areas ............................................................:............. 23 ; �� ' �� ° � i :.i • �i • :.,. ) i Pa�e 6.0 LWI DISCITSS�ON ANI) COl�TCI.iJSIONS .............................................................. 23 6.1 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory ................................. 23 6.2 Local Wetland Inventory Results ......................................................................... 24 6.2.1 Wetland Acreage and Distribution .......................................................... 24 6.2.2 Wetland Classification ............................................................................. 24 6.3 Oregon Freshwater V�etland Assessment Methodology Results ......................... 2S 6.3.1 Wetland Quality Assessment ................................................................... 25 6.3.2 Wetlands of Special Interest for Protection ............................................. 28 7.0 SIGNI�CANT �T'LANDS I�ETEl21l�INATION ................................................. 29 7.1 Distinction between Goals 5 and 17 .Areas .......................................................... 29 7.2 Goal 5 Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria ........:............................................. 29 7.3 Applying Significant Wetland Criteria to the LWI Study Area ........................... 30 7.3.1 Goal 5 Significant Wetlands .................................................................... 30 S.0 �PA►It][A1V INVEN'I'ORX �S�JI.TS ....................................................................... 31 8.1 Location, Width, and Quality of Riparian Areas ................................................. 31 8.2 Riparian Acreage and Distribution ...................................................................... 31 8.3 Riparian Assessment Results ............................................................................... 32 8.4 Determination of Significant Riparian Corridors ................................................ 33 8 .4.1 Safe Harbor .............................................................................................. 33 8.4:2 Standard Inventory ................................................................................... 34 9.0 WIL,l)LIF'E �ABITAT INVEN'T0�2�' �ST.TL'I'S ................................................... 34 9.1 Location of Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................ 34 9.2 Discussion of Wildlife Habitat Assessrnent Results ............................................ 35 9.3 Discussion of Significant Wildlife Habitat .......................................................... 3 S 10 .0 S:�IO�I.,IlV� ................................................................................................................36 11.0 �O�STED I,ANI)5 ..............................:..................................................................... 37 12.0 OPEN SPACE ................................................................................................................ 37 13.0 STAFF QTJAI..IFICA'TIONS ....................................................................................... 38 14.0 P1tOJEC'I' SIl1VI1VIA1tX ............................................................................................... 40 15. 0 12EFE12.ENCE S ............................................................................................................. 41 ... �� . •" �� : '•' �► . •' � ► � '" �► �'• �� " �� '" �► Figures Wetland Characterization Sheets Wetland Determination Data Forms OFWAM Data and Results Locally Significant Wetland Detenmination Sheets Riparian Assessment Forms Wildlife Habitat Assessment Forms Plant List OFWAM Field Fonns a.nd Slunmary Tables i c I�: i Pa�e Table l. Hydrologic Basins and Acreage for the City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories ....................................................... 17 Table 2. Soils Mappeci Within• the Depoe Bay LWI Study Area ....................................... 17 Table 3. Wetland Indicator Codes and Status .................................................................... 20 Table 4. Wetland Areas within Each Basin for the Depoe Bay LWI ................................ 24 Table 5. Types of Wetlands within the Depoe Bay LWI Study Area ................................ 24 Table 6. Table 7. Table 8. Table 9. ; Cowardin Classification of all Wetlands Identified in the Depoe Bay LWT ....... 25 Sumnzary of Wetlands Itiventoried wi�hin the Study Area .................................. 25 Key to the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Numerical ....................................................................:......................... 26 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Numerical Raaz1ci11g Results for the Depoe Bay LWI ...................................................................... 27 Table 10. Criteria for Determining Goa15 Locally Significant Wetlands ........................... 29 Table 1 l. Goal 5 Wetlands and Locally Significant Wetlands in the Depoe Bay LWI....... 30 Table 12. Riparian Corridors and Their Widths for the Depoe Bay Riparian Inventory..... 32 Table 13. Summary of Depoe Bay's Riparian Functional Assessments .............................. 32 Table 14. Criteria for Determiiung Significant Riparian Corridors ..................................... 34 ; 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Depoe Bay (City), through a grant from the Department of Land Conservation and Development, hired Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. (PHS) to condtzct a Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI), a Riparian Inventory and a review of wildlife habitat, shoreline, forest lands, and open space areas within the City's approximately 1,140-acre Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The UGB extends from just south of Boiler Bay State Wayside in the north to Whale Cove in the south. Highway 101 is the main road through the City. The goal of the study is to address the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 5 (Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces) and Goal 17 (Coastal Shorelands) Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) Section 660, Division 23. The objective of Goa15 is to "protect natural resources and conserve scenic, historic and open space resources for present and future generations." Goal 17 specifically addresses coastal shorelands. It is intended "to conserve, protect, where appropriate, develop and where appropriate restore the resources and benefits of all coastal shorelands, recognizing their value for protection and maintenance of water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, water-dependent uses, economic resources and recreation and aesthetics." Goal 17 applies to an area called the coastal shorelands planning area, which is generally all lands bordering the ocean, estuaries, and coastal lakes, and lands west of Highway 101. Specifically, the City hired PHS to determine the location and extent of wetlands; assess the quality of the wetlands; determine which of the Goa15 wetlands are Locally Significant Wetlands according to state administrative rules (OAR 141-86-300-350); determine which of the Goal 17 wetlands are Major Marshes and inventory and assess the quality of riparian areas. This report presents the results of both the wetlands and the riparian inventories and assessments. It also discusses wildlife habitat, open space, forested lands, and the shoreline. The study area is defined by the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and the City limits of the City of Depoe Bay. Depoe Bay is located in the coastal area of Lincoln County (Township 9 South, Range 11 West, Sections 5, 8, 17 and Township 8 South, Range 11 West, Section 32, Willamette Meridian). The two major streams within the study area are North and South Depoe Bay Creeks. The approximate study area is shown on Figure 1. All figures are in Appendix A. l.l Report Format This report begins by discussing the definitions used in the report and inventory (Section 2), followed by the methodology used to conduct the field work for the LWI and the riparian inventozy, the wetland and riparian assessment methodology, and the methodology used to produce the maps for the inventory (Section 3). Section 4 discusses the project cartography. Section 5 is the study area characteristics, such as the climate, topography, soils and vegetation; Section 6 discusses the Local Wetlands Inventory results, including wetland City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 1 distribution, acreage, Cowardin classification and the results of the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology; Section 7 presents the significant wetlands in the project area; Section 8 provides the results of the riparian inventory and assessment results; Sections 9, 10, 1 l, and 12 discuss the results of wildlife habitat, shorelands, forested lands, and open space, respectively. Section 13 presents the staff qualifications, while Section 14 summarizes the project; and Section 15 provides a list of the references used in the report. There are eight appendices to the report. Appendix A contains figures illustrating general location, soils and the National Wetlands Inventory maps of the study area. Tt also contains maps showing the wetland, riparian, wildlife habitat, shorelands, forested lands, and open space inventory results. Appendix B contains the wetland characterization forms for each wetland, organized by wetland code. The characterization sheets note wetland location, tax lots, acreage, Cowardin classification, Hydrogeomorphic classification, soil series, wetland vegetation; adjacent upland vegetation, and other notes related to adjacent wetlands or hydrology. This form was completed for each wetland unit, regardless of whether it was an on-site or off-site determination. If it was an on-site determination, sample point numbers are noted. Locally significant wetlands and major marshes are also noted on the characterization form. A suminary sheet showing which tax lots contain wetland is also included. Appendix C contains the wetland determination data forms. These forms document the sample points taken for the on-site wetlands and adj acent uplands. Hydrology, soils, and dominant vegetation are recorded for each sample point in order to determine whether it is wetland or upland. Appendix D is the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology data and summary for each wetland unit. Each wetland's functions and conditions are assessed according to an established state methodology. The results and rationale are also suinmarized for each wetland unit. Appendix E contains the determination of significance for each wetland unit. Appendix F contains the riparian characterization, riparian width forms, and the riparian assessment, and a summary sheet show the tax lots with riparian areas. Appendix G contains the Wildlife Habitat Assessment Forms, and Appendix H contains a listing of plant species encountered or expected within the project area. Appendix I includes OFWAM Field Fortns and Watershed Summary Tables, that helped answer the OFWAM Assessment. 2.0 DEFINITIONS These terms helped define the methodology used for the City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory and may be referred to in this report. 1987 Manual The Corps o�En�aneers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1. (Environmental Laboratory 1987) City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 2 This manual is used by the Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") and the Oregon Division of State Lands ("DSL") to document the location of wetlands within the State of Oregon. The 1987 manual provides technical criteria, field indicators, and recommended procedures to be used in determining whether an area is a jurisdictional wetland. Undisturbed areas require three criteria for them to be classified as wetland. These criteria are hydric soils, a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Cowardin Wetland Classification The classification of wetlands as defined by plants, soils and the frequency of flooding as described in "Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. "(Cowardin, et. a1. 1979) See Palustrine System and Estuarine System. Estuarine System "All tidal wetlands domanated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergents, emergent mosses or lichens and all such wetlands that occur an tidal areas where salinity is greater than D.S%. This includes areas traditionally called swamps, marshes, fens, as well as shallow, permanent or intermittent water bodies called ponds. " (Cowardin et. al. 1979) Goa15 Goal S(OAR 660, Division 23) is intended "to protect natural resources, and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. " (DLCD, 1995) Goa117 Goal 17 specifically addresses coastal shorelands. It is intended "to conserve, protect, where appropriate, develop and where appropriate restore the resources and benefits of all coastal shorelands, recognizing their value for protection and maintenance of water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, water-dependent uses, economic resources and recreation and aesthetics. " ( DLCD, 1995) Goal 17 applies to an area called the coastal shorelands planning area defined in the goal, which is generally all lands bordering the ocean, estuaries, and coastal lakes. Coastal shorelands include "natural or man-made riparian resources, especially vegetation necessary to stabilize the shoreline and to maintain water quality and femperature necessary for the znaintenance of fish habitat and spawning areas." Coastal jurisdictions must inventary or identify coastal shorelands, including riparian resources. Growing Season "The portion of the year when soil temperatures at 19.7 inches below the soil surface are higher than biological zero (41 ° Fahrenheit, S Celsius). "(COE, 1987) The growing season for any given site or location is determined from Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS, formerly the U.S. Soil Conservation Service SCS) data and information. The length of the season can be approximated from frost- free days, based on air temperature. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 3 Hydric Soils "Soils which are ponded, flooded, or saturated for long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions. "(USDA, SCS, 1985) Periodic saturation of soils causes alternation of reduced and oxidized conditions which leads to the formation of redoximorphic features (gleying and mottling). Mineral hydric soils will be either gleyed or will have bright mottles and/or low matrix chroma. The redoximorphic feature known as gley is a result of greatly reduced soil conditions, which result in a characteristic grayish, bluish or greenish soil color. The term mottling is used to describe areas of contrasting color within a soil matrix. The soil matrix is the portion of the soil layer that has the predominant color. Soils that have brightly colored mottles and a low matrix chroma are indicative of a fluctuating water table. Hydric soil indicators include: organic content of greater than 50% by volume, sulfidic material or "rotten egg" smell, and/or presence of redoximorphic features and dark soil matrix, as determined by the use of a Munsell Soil Color Chart. This chart establishes the chroma, value and hue of soils based on comparison with color chips. Mineral hydric soils usually have a matrix chroma of 2 or less in mottled soils, or a matrix chroma of 1 or less in unmottled soils. Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Wetland Classification A method of assessing wetlands usang the physacal, chemical, and biological functions of wetlands. It is based on the relationship of geomorphic setting, water source, and hydrodynamics. (Brinson, 1993) Hydrophytic Vegetation "Plant life growing in water or on a substrate that is at least periodicaldy deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. "(National Resource Council, 1995) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands, has established f ve basic groups of vegetation based on their frequency of occurrence in wetlands. These categories, referred to as the "wetland indicator status," are as follows: obligate wetland plants (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), facultative (FAC), facultative upland (FACi�, and obligate upland (UPL). Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) An inventory of all wetlands greater than 0.5 acres in size within a local jurisdiction using the standards and procedures of OAR 141-86-110 through 141-86-240. In 1989, the Oregon State legislature authorized DSL to develop a statewide wetlands inventory for planning and regulatory purposes. Accordingly, DSL established Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) standards and guidelines under ORS 196.674. An approved LWI replaces the National Wetlands Inventory maps and is incorporated into the statewide wetlands inventory. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 4 An LWI is conducted using color or color infrared aerial photographs taken within 5 years of the inventory initiation and at a minimum scale of 1 inch = 400 feet (1" = 400'). Wetlands are located using the on-site option where access to property is allowed, or off-site where access is denied. Wetlands can be mapped off-site by using information such as topographic and National Wetlands Inventory maps, aerial photographs, and soils surveys. The approximate location of wetlands is placed on a parcel-based map. The parcel- based map allows the property owner, the local jurisdiction, and DSL, to know which tax lots may contain wetlands. The maps and documents produced for the LWI are intended for planning purposes only. Mapped wetland boundaries are accurate to within 25 feet; however, there may be unmapped wetlands that are subject to regulation. In all cases, actual field conditions determine wetland boundaries. Palustrine 5ystem (e.g. PEM) "All nontidal wetlands dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergents, emergent mosses or lichens and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas where salinity is less than 0.5%. This includes areas traditionally called swamps, marshes, fens, as well as shallow, permanent or intermittent water bodies called ponds. "(Cowardin et. al. 1979) • Unconsolidated bottom (PUB) A wetland and deepwater habitats with at least 25% cover of particles smaller than stones and a vegetative cover less than 30%. • Emergent Wetland (PEM) These wetlands have rooted herbaceous vegetation which stand erect above the water or ground surface. Scrub-shrub Wetland (PSS) Wetlands dominated by shrubs and tree saplings that are less than 20 feet high. • Forested Wetland (PFO) Wetlands dominated by trees that are greater than 20 feet high. Riparian Area "The area immediately adjacent to a water resource, which affects or is affected by the water resource. Riparian areas do not include the water resource itself. "(PHS, 1998) City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 5 Riparian Assessment "Determining the relative quality of a riparian area by assessing its functions. " (PHS, 1998) An evaluation of the ability of the riparian area to provide water quality, flood management, thermal regulation, and wildlife habitat functions. The methodology generally used to determine the relative quality of riparian areas for purposes of an inventory is The Urban Riparian Inventory and Assessment Cncide. Riparian Function A characteristic action or role provided by riparian areas, such as water quality; flood management; thermal regulation; and wildlife habitat. (PHS, 1998) Riparian Inventory An inventory of location and extent of riparian areas within the boundaries of the Local Wetlands Inventory using "The Urban Riparaan Inventory and Assessment Guide. " Riverine System °'The riverine system ancludes all wetlands and deepwater habitats contained within a channel. " ( Cowardin, et. al. 1979) Waters of the State Natural water-ways ancluding all tidal and nontidal bays, intermittent streams, constantly flowing streams, lakes, wetlands and other bodies of water an this state, navagable and nonnavigable. Natural waterways are definecl as: waterways created naturally by geologacal and hydrological processes, and waterways that would be natural but for human-caused disturbances (e.g. channelized or culverted streams, ampounded waters, partially drained wetlands or ponds created an wetlands). (ORS 196.800-196.990, 1995) Water Resource "An intermittent or perennial stream, pond, river, lake and including their adjacent wetlands. " ( PHS, 1998) Wetland "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. " (Federal Register 1982). City ofDepoe Bay Local Wetlanrls and Riparian Inventories Page 6 Wetland Assessment Determining the relative quality of a wetland by assessang its functions and conditions. The methodology generally used to determine the relative quality of wetlands for purposes of an LWI is the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology. (Roth, et. al. 1996) Wetland Condition "The antegrity of a wetland's physical and biological structure. This determines the ability of the wetland to perform specific functaons, as well as ats resaltence and enhancement opportunataes. " (Roth et al., 1996) Wetland Function 'A characteristic action or behavior associated with a wetland that contributes to a larger ecological condition such as wildlife habitat, water quality and/or flood control. " ( Roth, et. al. 1996) Wetland Hydrology "Permanent or periodic inundation or prolonged soil saturation sufficient to create anaerobic conditions in the upper soil profile. " (COE, 1987) Wetland hydrology is related to duration of saturation, frequency of saturation, and critical depth of saturation. The 1987 manual defines wetland hydrology as inundation or saturation within a major portion of the root zone (usually above 12 inches), typically for at least 12.5% of the growing season. The wetland hydrology criterion can be met, however, if saturation within the major portion of the root zone is present for only 5% of the growing season, depending on other evidence. Wetlands Regulation Wetlands in Oregon are regulated by the Division of State Lands (DSL) under the Removal-Fill Law (ORS 196.800-196.990) and by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. 3.0 PROJECT METHODOLOGY 3.1 Public Involvement Prior to beginning the inventory, the City of Depoe Bay mailed notices to selected landowners who may have wetlands or riparian areas on their property. Landowners who had areas of mapped hydric soils, soils with hydric inclusions, National Wetlands Inventory mapped wetlands, or suspected wetland or streams received a notice of permission for site access. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian bzventories Page 7 Individual landowners were contacted directly by either the City or PHS. Access information was then transferred to the base map for use in the field. Two public meetings were held during the course of the inventory. The first meeting was held on August 13, 2003, to introduce the project to the residents of Depoe Bay. This meeting was held prior to the date required for return of the access request letters to answer any questions affected landowners may have for representatives of the City and PHS. The second public meeting was held on December 4, 2003, to present the draft results of the inventory to members of the City Planning Commission, City Council and residents of Depoe Bay. 3.2 Local Wetlands Inventory Methodology 3.2.1 Routine Off-site Determination Prior to beginning field work, off-site mapping was conducted to determine the approximate location of wetland boundaries based on available information. This information included the USGS topographic quadrangles, the draft soil survey maps for Lincoln County Area (NRCS, 2001), the National Wetlands Inventory maps (USFWS, July 1982), and true color aerial photographs (July 9, 2002; 1"=400'). If access was allowed, the wetland boundaries were verified in the field (see Section 3.2.2). If access was not granted, the boundaries were based on the mapping conducted in the office, and on observation of wetland boundaries from adjacent roads, or properties, if possible. 3.2.2 Routine On-site Determination Where property access permission had been granted, on-site observation and inspection of soils, vegetation, and hydrology were made using the Routine On-site Method of the 1987 manual. Soil pits were excavated up to a depth of approximately 18-inches in selected locations. The soil profiles were examined for hydric soils and wetland hydrology field indicators. A visual percent-cover estimate of the dominant species of the plant community for a maximum 30-foot radius was conducted at each sampling location. Samp�ing locations were chosen to document a change in the wetland boundary and a particular plant community, Data was recorded in the field and transferred to computer-generated wetland delineation data sheets (Appendix C). Field work for the inventory was conducted between May and October, 2003. No wetland boundaries were staked or flagged in the field. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands a�ad Riparian Inventories Page 8 3.3 Wetland Quality Assessment 3.3.1 The Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology The quality of wetlands in the study area was assessed using the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (OFWAIV� (Roth et al. 1996). OFWAM was developed by an interagency committee to assess the relative quality of wetlands primarily for planning and educational purposes. Copies of the methodology are available from DSL for a fee. OFWAM does not assign a numeric ranking to the wetlands, but does determine the relative quatity of six functions and three conditions for each of the wetlands. A description of each of the functions and conditions is included below. Wetland Functions Wildlife habitat: Evaluates the habitat diversity for species usually associated with wetlands, without emphasizing one particular species. Wetlands assessed by OFWAM can provide diverse habitat for wildlife, habitat for some wildlife species, or does not provide habitat. �'ish habitat: Evaluates how a wetland contributes to fish habitat in streams, ponds or lakes associated with a wetland. The questions are suitable for both warmwater and coldwater fish and no particular species is emphasized. Wetlands assessed by OFWAM can have fish habitat function intact, impacted or degraded, or lost or not present. Water Quality: Evaluates the potential of a wetland to reduce the impacts of excess nutrients in storm water runoff on downstream waters. A wetland's water quality function can be assessed by OFWAM as intact, impacted or degraded, or lost or not present. Hydrologic control: Evaluates the effectiveness of a wetland to reduce downstream flood peaks and store floodwaters. A wetland's hydrologic control functions can be assessed by OFWAM as intact, impacted or degraded, or lost or not present. Education: Evaluates the suitability of a wetland to provide educational opportunity and act as an "outdoor classroom." A wetland assessed by OFWAM can have educational uses, have the potential to provide, or not be appropriate for educational uses. Recreation: Evaluates the suitability of a wetland and associated watercourses for non-powered boating, fishing, and similar recreational activities. A wetland assessed by OFWAM can provide, have the potential to provide, or not provide recreational opportunities. Wetland Conditions Sensitivity to Future Impacts: Evaluates the wetland's ability to sustain itself and its ability to recover from future impacts. It is an indication of risk to the wetland because of future changes in the watershed and surrounding Iand. A wetland can be assessed by OFWAM as sensitive to future impacts, potentially sensitive to future impacts, or not sensitive to future impacts. An undisturbed forested wetland is more sensitive to future impact than a wetland that has already been disturbed, such as agricultural wetland. City ofDepoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 9 Enhancement Potential: Evaluates the suitability of a degraded wetland for enhancement. A wetland providing this condition does not provide one or more of the functions assessed by OFWAM. A wetland fulfilling this condition, therefore, would be of lower overall quality than a wetland providing wildlife habitat, fish habitat, etc. Wetlands that provide diverse wildlife habitat were not assessed in this section, as per the revised OFWAM. Wetlands are assessed as either high enhancement potential, moderate enhancement potenfial, or little enhancement potential. Aesthetic quality: Evaluates the visual and aesthetic quality of the wetland. Wetlands can be considered pleasing, moderately pleasing, or not pleasing. 3.3.2 Wetlands of Special Interest for Protection The first filter in OFWAM is to determine whether the wetland is in a management plan, is protected by regulatory rules or statutes, or is uncommon in Oregon. Ten questions are answered for each wetland and a"yes" answer to any of the questions puts the wetland into the "special interest for protection" category. If the wetland falls into this category, it is noted on the wetland characterization sheet. 3.3.3 Field Methodology During the process of determining the boundaries for the LWI, data were also collected for the process of determining its relative quality. Data collected for this purpose are explained in the Wetland Characterization section of OFWAM. Data collected in the field included the Cowardin classes, the types of disturbance (if any) in the wetland area, the hydrology of the wetland area (e.g. the location of constrictions), the presence of fish, large woody debris, the degree of vegetative cover, and other information necessary to complete the assessment of the wetland in the office. If the wetland determination was off-site, the OFWAM section and wetland characterization was based on review of the aerial photographs and knowledge of other similar or adjacent wetlands. 3.3.4 Of�ce Assessment Subsequent to the field work, the data collected for each wetland were used to answer questions for each function and condition. Additional information on the wetlands, the landscape and the general area were gathered in the office. The answers within each function and condition section of the methodology were entered into a computer spreadsheet, which automatically displays the results of the assessment methodology. Prior to starting the OFWAM assessment certain criteria or baseline information was established. The following is a list of the criteria used in answering the questions: The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has not mapped any bodies of water within the Depoe Bay study area as water quality limited. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 10 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) has electroshocked creeks throughout the study area to determine fish presence. North and South Depoe Bay Creeks contain coho, steelhead, and cutthroat trout (ODFW, pers. comm.). This information was used in Fish Habitat, question 6. These creeks are considered to be Essential Indigenous Anadromous Salmonid Habitat by ODFW and DSL (DSL, OAR 141-102-030, 1996). Surprisingly, no other creek within the Depoe Bay study area, including those within the Little Whale Cove residential area, provide habitat for any species of fish. The enhancement potential section was not required if the wetland was assessed with "diverse wildlife habitat," as per OFWAM directive. In addition, question 3 was specifically directed towards wetlands whose primary source of hydrology was surface water. If this was not the case (i.e. primary source of hydrology is groundwater), question 3 was not answered. 3.4 Riparian Inventory 3.4.1 Urban Riparian Inventory and Assessment Guide The Urban Riparian Inventory and Assessment Guide (Riparian Guide) was used for the Depoe Bay Riparian Inventory. The Riparian Guide depends on a combination of best available knowledge, field observations, and best professional judgment. The methodology is comprised of the riparian inventory and the riparian assessment. The riparian inventory involves gathering and assimilating information pertinent to the project site, developing a base map, and completing the Riparian Characterization Form. The guide was designed to work in conjunction with the LWI and relies on the same aerial photograph or base map. In addition, coding of the riparian areas is based on hydrologic basins, reflecting the coding system established for the LWI. The inventory portion of the Guide depends on the completion of a Riparian Characterization Form and Riparian Width Detertnination Form. A completed Riparian Characterization Form provides information on the physical and biological characteristics of the riparian area, such as vegetation, slope, adjacent land uses, and degree of disturbance. Most of the form was completed on-site, provided access was allowed. However, some portions, such as the mapped soil series, were completed in the office. The riparian width is measured from the edge of the water resource, typically either the top of a streambank or the outer edge of a wetland, lake, or pond. The riparian potential width is based on the dominant riparian tree species within 100 feet of the water resource. The height of the dominant tree species at maturity will be used as a distance to define the outer riparian boundary. The height of this tree species at maturity is called the potential tree height (PTH). PTH is used as the potential riparian width because it represents a distance in which a tree can still affect the water resource (e.g. shade, organic material). City ofDepoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page II Where riparian trees have been eliminated by land-use activities or natural causes, such as development, land slides, or logging, it may be necessary to extrapolate tree heights from a reference site. The reference site should be similar in character and landscape position and should be located as close as possible to the riparian reach. If a reference site is used, it is noted on the Width Determination Form. If a reference site cannot be located, field observations and reference materials must be used to establish PTH. Although the riparian width will never exceed the PTH, it may be less than the PTH if impervious surfaces or permanent structures (e.g. buildings or roads) are inventonied within the riparian area. Completion of the Riparian Width Determination Form also requires drawing a typical cross section through the riparian area. 3.4.2 Riparian Assessment Riparian areas provide numerous and complex functions that affect both aquatic and terrestrial systems. Many ecological functions of riparian areas are also provided by wetlands, floodplains, and vegetated upland areas. The Riparian Function Assessment evaluates the ability of the riparian area to provide water quality, flood management, thermal regulation, and wildlife habitat functions. The results indicate whether the functions of each reach are intact, degraded, or severely impacted. The assessment is completed by answering a series of questions. Most of the questions are intended to be answered using data from the Riparian Characterization Form. Because certain elements or characteristics of a riparian area are more critical to its function, the answers are "weighted." The points are then totaled for each side and for each function. Based on the score, the riparian function will be assessed as high, medium or low. The results of the Riparian Function Assessment for all of the riparian areas within the inventory study area are then transferred to a Riparian Function Assessment Summary Tab1e. 3.4.3 Riparian Functions Water Quality Riparian areas can enhance water quality in many ways. Undisturbed, densely vegetated riparian areas trap sediments, inhibit erosion and filter runoff originating from impervious surfaces, lawns, golf courses, etc. Sedimentation and erosion, although natural processes, are accelerated in urban areas by increased impervious surfaces. Impervious surfaces also inhibit infiltration. Sediment within a riparian area can be from erosion of poorly vegetated uplands, runoff from impervious surfaces, or floods from an adjacent water resource. Sediments often carry nutrients (e.g. phosphates and nitrates) and pollutants (e.g. heavy metals, hydrocarbons) to water resources, altering water chemistry, burying spawning gravels and impacting fish and wildlife habitat. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlancls and Riparian Inventories Page 12 Excessive concentration of nutrients in the water can trigger algal blooms, depleting the water of oxygen required by fish and other aquatic orgarusms. The ability of a riparian area to resist erosion is related to slope, soil type, type of vegetation, vegetation cover, landscape position, and degree of human disturbance. Flood Management Riparian areas and associated wetlands and floodplains provide a valuable flood management function by reducing the force and volume of floodwaters. Floodwaters flowing into a vegetated flood prone ripanian area can be slowed or temporarily stored, reducing peak flows and flooding downstream. Woody vegetation, in particular, resists floodwaters and reduces its velocity. Topographic features, such as swales and depressions, can enhance a riparian area's ability to manage flood flows. Reducing the velocity of floodwaters in the riparian area allows infiltration of water into the soil. Water entering the soil is slowly released into the main channel, delaying its movement downstream. Thermal Regulation Water temperature affects the ability of a stream to support viable populations of certain aquatic organisms. Riparian shade, especially forest canopy, moderates temperature within and adjacent to a water resource. Although stream temperatures are important throughout the year, swnmer temperature is generally more critical for fish species such as salmonids. High water temperatures and sunlight are factors that can promote algal blooms, reducing dissolved oxygen required by anadromous fish and other cold-water dependent organisms. The aspect or orientation of the water resource and the height of the adjacent riparian vegetation play important roles in how effective riparian vegetation is in providing shade. Wildlife Habitat Riparian areas provide valuable habitat for wildlife and influence fish habitat. The highest quality wildlife habitat in urban areas has a variety of plant species and layers, a perennial water source, and some degree of protectian or buffering from disturbance. Riparian areas are particularly important migration comdors between upland and aquatic systems for a wide variety of species. It has been reported that the majority of Oregon's major wildlife species, including amphibians and reptiles, use wetlands or riparian areas during some portion of their life cycle. 3.5 Wildlife Habitat To determine wildlife habitat within the Depoe Bay study area, PHS reviewed the information from the Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center and discussed wildlife habitat and species presence with representatives of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Aerial photographs of Depoe Bay were reviewed to document existing conditions and to identify areas of potential habitat. The focus of the research was to Iocate areas that appeared to have a canopy cover of native vegetation or that could provide a corridor for wildlife passage within the study area. Ciry of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands ancl Rzparian Inventories Page 13 Large tracts of forested land still exist within the Depoe Bay study area. These tracts of forest provide habitat for a variety of wildlife species. However, according to ODFW, the most important habitat is within the rip.arian areas. Ground visits to riparian areas were conducted, where a Wildlife Habitat Assessment Form (WHA), similar to those adopted by other municipalities during their Goa15 Inventories, was completed. The Habitat Assessment Forms generate a numerical score that can be used as an indication of habitat quality. Various aspects of the three primary habitat components, food, water and cover are scored in terms of quality, diversity and availability. These scores are then totaled for an existing habitat score. The wildlife habitat assessment was conducted at the same time as the LWI and riparian inventory. As such, on-site observation, where possible, were made and assessments were performed from adjacent properties or nearby roads where access was denied. 4.0 CARTOGRAPHY Color aerial photographs were obtained for use in the field. These photos are 2002 true color, with a scale of approximately 1 inch = 400 feet. Clear acetate was overlaid and permanently registered on the photographs and preliminary wetland boundaries and data point locations were drawn directly on the acetate in the field. In addition, areas within the project area where permission to enter was denied were drawn on the acetate overlays. The wetland boundaries and approximate affected tax lot boundaries were then transferred into a digital format and inserted into a computer-based map derived from the County's GIS base. Additional layers added to the AutoCAD base map included watershed basin boundaries, streams from the USGS, additional geographic names, wetland codes, riparian codes, wildlife habitat codes, forested lands, open space and sample point locations. A hydrologic basin refers to the drainage area for an individually named stream or creek. Each wetland was assigned a code beginning with the two letter hydrologic basin designation and the number of wetlands within each watershed (e.g. NDB- # for North Depoe Bay Creek, SDB-# for South Depoe Bay Creek, WC-# for Whale Cove). Wetlands that were hydrologically connected but separated by roads or were similax in character and in close proximity, were labeled with a code modifier (e.g. WC-la and lb). Several wetlands that are less than one-half acre in size were labeled with a different modifier "PW" ("probable wetland"). The riparian mapping was drawn on the 1" = 400' base maps and scanned into the base as a separate layer. The riparian areas were labeled with a riparian code (e.g. R-NDB-2). Each reach was assigned a separate code. Riparian widths were transferred to the base map. They were measured horizontally from the outer edge of the stream or associated wetland. The final digital maps include a legend, north arrow, scale, and a disclaimer if not all wetland or riparian areas were assessed on-site or if mapping inaccuracies occur. The map projection is the Universal Transverse Mercator (LTTNI), Oregon State Plane NAD 83 South. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlancls and Riparian Inventories Page 14 5.0 STUDY AREA CHARACTERISTICS AND EXISTING INVENTORY INFORMATION 5.1 Geologic Setting The oldest geologic materials in Depoe Bay are sediments of the Astoria Formation. These early to middle Miocene marine sediments consist of clastics deposited in a shallow marine environment The Astoria Formation, which extends to the north all along the Oregon coast, consists of mica-bearing siltstones and sandstones with numerous shell fossils. Overlying and intruding the marine sediments are the Depoe Bay basalts, a sequence of pillow basalts that forms the base of Depoe Bay. These basalts, which have the geochemical signature of the Grande Ronde flows of Columbia River basalts, have apparently been extruded into an environment of seawater and unconsolidated sediments. The emplacement mechanism is probably multiple with numerous dikes intruding the underlying sediments. The dikes in many cases have numerous inclusions of the surrounding clastic sediments. A 15- meter section of similar basalt was found 10.8 miles seaward in the Nautilus well at a depth of about 3,730 feet. Within and overlying the pillow basalt is a sandstone known locally as the Whale Cove Sandstone. This coarse and massive sandstone occupies channels cut into a thin-bedded � estuarine siltstone. Sedimentary structures within the sandstone suggest contemporary rapid deposition and soft sediment disturbance from the rapid loading. Overlying the Whale Cove Sandstone and forming the headlands that define Depoe Bay are the Cape Foulweather Basalts. These thick basalts have the geochemical signature of the Frenchman Springs member of the Wanapum flows of the Columbia River basalts. Although the notion of subaerial flood basalts intruding marine sediments at great distance from the vents is an unusual one, many geologists have come to regard these basalt intrusions of nearly contemporary unconsolidated sediments as the Pacific equivalent of the remote Columbia River basalts. Subsequent downward faulting between northwest and southwest trending faults around Depoe Bay have emplaced the Cape Foulweather basalt headlands that define the bay. All the rocks within the sequence are presently dipping gently (10°-20°) seaward. 5.2 Topography The City of Depoe Bay rests on marine terrace materials that in turn overlie sandstone and basaltic rock formations. The project area is comprised of a narrow level terrace along the north and south sides of Depoe Bay and steep slopes to the south, north and east. Several perennial creeks and numerous intermittent drainages are within the study area, including the North Depoe Bay Creek, South Depoe Bay Creek, Depoe Bay Creek and Deadhorse Creek. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page I S The nearly level area located between the ocean and just east of Highway 101 is a combination of residential, light industrial, marine and commercial properties. Witlun this area, the Port of Depoe Bay operates a marina, and landings and floats to accommodate excursion and commercial fishing boats. Elevations range from 0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) to approximately 820 feet NGVD at the tops of hills in the northeast region of the UGB. 5.3 Hydrology 5.3.1 Hydrologic Features of the Depoe Bay Study Area Major hydrologic features of the project area include North and South Depoe Bay Creek, which flow into Depoe Bay; and Depoe Bay Creek, which is a tributary to South Depoe Bay Creek. Minor hydrologic features include several intermittent drainages originating in the steep hillsides. One such drainage is Deadhorse Creek, which flows into Whale Cove; another drainage flows into Pirate Cove. North Depoe Bay Creek is a tributary to Depoe Bay. Within the Depoe Bay UGB, North Depoe Bay Creek is a 6` stream. North Depoe Bay Creek provides spawning and rearing habitat for several anadromous salmonids and is DSL-designated essential habitat for that reason. Another main drainage is South Depoe Bay Creek, located in the central third of the UGB. It is also salmonid-bearing and DSL-designated essential salmonid habitat. Several tributaries to South Depoe Bay Creek are present, but have their points of origin outside the UGB. Deadhorse Creek drains from the eastern hillsides west to the Pacific Ocean at Whale Cove in the southern tip of the UGB. A small unnamed drainage also flows into the Pacific Ocean in the southern tip of Depoe Bay. Minor drainages, spring and seeps are also present in the study area; however, due to the steep topography and permeable soils, they are generally intermittent. In addition, low-lying areas along the coastline and adjacent to the major creeks are mapped within the 100-year floodplain by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 5.3.2 Hydrologic Basin Designation The study area was divided into three primary hydrologic basins: North Depoe Bay Creek (NDB), South Depoe Bay Creek (SDB) and Whale Cove (WC). Determination of the basins was based on USGS topography and observations of drainage patterns from the aerial photographs. The watersheds and their sizes are listed in Table 1. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 16 Table 1: Hydrologic Basins and Acreage for the City af Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Hydrologic Basin - ;Basin Area (acres) North Depoe Bay 545 South Depoe Bay 329 Whale Cove 266 Total Projecf Acreage 1,140 5.3.3 Hydrologic Indicators Direct indicators of hydrology observed during the inventory included soils saturated at or near the surface, inundatian, and a shallow water table. Indirect indicators included oxidized rhizospheres with living roots, algal mats, drift lines, and wetland drainage patterns. 5.4 Soils Table 2lists the soils that have been mapped by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS; formerly the Soil Conservation Service) within the Depoe Bay study area. Figure 2 shows the mapped soils within the Depoe Bay UGB. Table 2. Soils Mapped Within the Depoe Bay LWI Study Area so; 3C 3E 4A 14B 18G 22C 35E 42C 42E 45E 45G 46A SSE Soil Name . Stopes ' Classificatian. Drainage•Class Hydric? Bandon fine sandy loam 3-12% Typic Haplorthods Bandon fine sandy loam 12-50% Typic Haplorthods Beaches 1-2% N/A Depoe loam Typic Duraquods Fendall-Templeton silt loam 35-60% Andic Humitropepts Gleneden silty clay loam Aquic Humic Dystrudepts Lint silt loam 5-25% Typic Fulvudands Nelscott loarn 3-12% Typic Durorthods Nelscott loam 12-50% Typic Durorthods Neskowin-Salander silt loam 5-35% Typic Fulwdands Neskowin-Salander silt loam 35-60% Typic Fulvudands Nestucca silt loam 0-2% Fluvaquentic Humaquepts Templeton-Pendall silt loam- 5-35% Andic Humitropepts Wetl drained Well drained N/A Poorly drained Well drained Somewhat poorly drained Well drained Moderately well drained Moderately well drained Weli drained Well drained Somewhat poorly drained Well drained A variety of soil types were sampled during field visits to the study area; surface features are described on data sheets in Appendix C. Hydric soil indicators observed during the survey included low chroma soils, both with and without redoximarphic features. No No Yes Yes No No No No No No No No No City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 17 5.5 Vegetation 5.5.1 Vegetation Overview The City of Depoe Bay is located within the Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis) Forest Zone (as characterized by Franklin and Dyrness, 1973). This vegetation zone occupies a low-elevation strip along the immediate coastline, often only a few miles wide, and is subject to a relatively wet and mild climate. The zone is distinguished largely by the presence of Sitka spruce, frequent summer fogs, and proximity to the ocean. This portion of the Oregon coast is drier however, than other coastal areas to the north. Areas to the east of the first ridge or sheltered from prevailing winds and fog begin to assume plant compositions more similar to the interior valleys. Common trees found in this region include Sitka spruce, western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), grand fir (Abies grandis) and red alder (Alnus rubra). Other trees observed in the drier or more protected areas include shore pine (Pinus contorta). Further discussion of coastal plant communities within the Sitka Spruce Zone can be found in Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington (Franklin and Dyrness 1973). 5.5.2 Local Vegetation Communities Generalized plant communities encountered within the City of Depoe Bay study area include upland broadleaf-scrub/shrub thicket, upland coniferous forest, upland mixed coruferous/deciduous forest, developed-urban, wetland, and riparian. Wetland communities are further distinguished as freshwater (palustrine emergent, palustrine scrub-shrub, palustrine forested; and riverine systems), and brackish (estuarine emergent, estuarine scrub-shrub, and estuarine forested) following the Cowardin classification system developed for the US Fish and Wildlife Service (Cowaxdin, et. al., 1979). Each of the above communities is described in the sections below. A list ofplant species known or expected to be in the area is included in Appendix H. Upland Broadleaf Scrub/Shrub Thicket Shrub communities are typically associated with relatively recent or periodically occumng disturbances (i.e, following logging, grading, and fire; or subject to flooding). Dominant species may include saplings of regenerating conifers such as Sitka spruce or pouglas-fir, deciduous trees such as red alder, and shrubs such as salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), thimbleberry (Rubus parviflorus), salal (Gaultheria shallon), vine maple (Acer circinatum), evergreen huckleberry (Yaccinium ovatum), rhododendron (Rhododendron macrophyllum), and blackberries (Rubus spp.). Introduced Scots' broom (Cytisus scoparius) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) are also rapid colonizers in disturbed areas. Herbaceous species are common in cleared openings, often being the first plants to colonize disturbed ground. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Pczge 18 Upland Coniferous Forest The dominant species in the coniferous overstory are Douglas-fir, Sitka spruce, western hemlock, and western red cedar. Sitka spruce is more common closer to the ocean, with the other species becoming more dominant further inland or in managed forests. Understory plants vary greatly with the density of the tree canopy. A closed canopy forest tends to suppress understory species diversity and density, though species such as false lily-of-the- valley (Maianthemum dilatatum) and sword fern (Polystichum munitum) are commonly encountered. Openings in the canopy allow greater shrub development, with salmonberry, salal, rhododendron, and evergreen huckleberry often evident. Upland Mixed Coniferous Deciduous Forest The conifer species mentioned above may be codominant with deciduous hardwoods such as red alder, bigleaf maple, and willows (Salix spp). Shrub understories are often well-developed due to a more open tree overstory for much of the year. Common shrubs include salmonberry, red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), vine maple, evergreen huckleberry, salal, and cascara (Rhamnus purshiana). Developed-Urban In general, plant communities in the City of Depoe Bay study area have been influenced by human activities for most of this century. The study area includes developed commercial areas and single-family residential subdivisions, as well as widely dispersed rural residential. No old growth stands exist. As such, there are few undisturbed natural areas within the UGB. Residences, businesses, parking areas, roads, and sidewalks all represent unvegetated or landscaped areas. Vegetation is often of horticultural origin or weedy in these areas. The fringes of these developed areas may have been subject to disturbance as well, often allowed to regenerate as red alder, Scot's broom or blackberry thickets. More frequent disturbance may maintain areas as open spaces dominated by weedy grasses and forbs. Wetlands Wetland areas are generally transitional between upland or riparian areas and truly aquatic sites with permanentiy open water. Open water may or may not be present, in wl�ich case the wetland can occupy a position where the groundwater table comes close to the surface for an extended period at some time duning the growing season. Palustrine forested wetlands (PFO) in the area are dominated primarily by an overstory of Sitka spruce, western hemlock, western red cedar, and red alder. Palustrine scrub/shrub (PSS) wetlands typically include sapling red alder, willows and twinberry (�onicera involucrata). Palustrine emergent wetlands (PEM) are dominated by herbaceous species such as sedges (Carex spp.) water parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa), rushes (Juncus spp.), birds foot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus} and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens). City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 19 Riparian Riparian forests are often similar to the upland mixed evergreen-deciduous forests, though species preferring wetter sites may be more common. Alder and willow dominate in the wetter areas, with Sitka spruce and bigleaf maple more common in the drier riparian zones. 5.5.3 Wetland and Upland Indicator Species Species lists of commonly encountered plants, along with their status as indicators of wetland conditions, have been prepared for all regions of the country by the USFWS (1988). The status of a particular plant, as discussed in Section 2.0, is the probability of that plant occurring in a wetland. Table 3 suirunarizes the wetland indicator codes. Table 3. Wetland Indicator Codes and Status OBL Obligate wetland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in wetlands (>99%) FACW Facultative wetland. Estimated to occur 67-99% of the time in wetlands. FAC Facultative. Occur equally in wetlands and non-wetlands (34-66%). FACU Facultative upland. Usually occur in non-wetlands (67-99%). UPL Obligate upland. Estimated to occur almost exclusively in non-wetlands (>99%). If a species is not assigned to one of the four groups described above it is assumed to be obligate upland. NI Has not yet received a wetland indicator status, but is probably not obligate upland. Many plants are found in transitional areas between wetlands and uplands. These areas are usually characterized by flat to gradually sloping terrain where the species composition may not reflect true wetland boundaries. In such areas, a species with a status of FACU may extend into the wetland areas, just as FACW species may also be present in upland areas. A non-comprehensive listing of plant species encountered or expected within the project area, and their wetland indicator status, is included in Appendix H. 5.6 Wildlife 5.6.1 Threatened or Endangered Species The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) is administered through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The Oregon Endangered Species Act of 1987 (OESA) is administered by the state Departments of Agriculture (ODA) and Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Each have particular powers and limitations depending on the ownership status and/or actions being considered on the sensitive species' habitat. In addition, individual land management agencies (including the US Forest Service) typically maintain their own sensitive species lists. These may be more inclusive than required by the ESA, with management goals set for un�isted sensitive species as well. Ciry of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands ancl Riparian Inventories Page 20 The Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center (ORNHIC, previously the Oregon Natural Heritage Program, or ORNHP) maintains a statewide database that tracks population trends for individual plant and animal species (ORNHP, 2001). The sensitivity of species to various influences, regardless of origin, is monitored through many sources, including public agencies, academic institutions, and private groups. Trends are re-evaluated periodically to assess whether an individual species warrants legal protection under the federal and state endangered species acts. ORNHIC has records of the following species occurrences within or near the UGB of the City of Depoe Bay: Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Federal status: Threatened, Proposed Delisted; State status: Threatened Use of habitat by bald eagles within and immediately adjacent to the Depoe Bay UGB has been documented by ORNHIC. This species forages aerially over water bodies, and Depoe Bay waters (e.g., the Pacific Ocean) have sufficient fisheries resources to support bald eagles. Several nesting sites have been documented in Whale Cove (in the southern portion of the UGB), with successful fledging within the past 3 years. Bald eagles nest in tall snags or mature trees, often utilizing the tallest tree in a given area to facilitate location of prey. These nest sites are usually near water (e.g., within riparian corridors). Primaxy habitat use within the city limits is likely feeding. Critical habitat has not been designated for this species. Coho salmon (Oregon Coastal Run ESin (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Federal status: Threatened; State status: Sensitive-Critical Coho salmon are anadromous fish species that use aquatic resources within the City of Depoe Bay. This species has been documented by ORNHIC and StreamNet (2003) as using Depoe Bay for migration and rearing habitat. Coho use North Depoe Bay Creek as spawning and rearing habitat (from river mile 0.0 to 0.6), and South Depoe Bay Creek for migration and rearing habitat (from river mile 0.0 to 0.2); and spawning and rearing habitat (from river mile 0.2 to 3.4). Coho spawn in small coastal streams and tributaries of large rivers. They prefer areas of mid- velocity water with small to medium-sized gravels and ample riparian vegetation. Coho fry are usually found in the pools of small coastal streams and the tributaries of larger rivers (ORNHIC, 2003). Critical habitat for this species has been vacated by NOAA fisheries, pending further developments. Steelhead (Oregon Coast Winter Run) (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Federal status: Candidate; State status: Sensitive-Vulnerable Steelhead are anadromous fish species that use habitat within the City of Depoe Bay. This species has been documented by ORNHIC and StreamNet (2003) as using Depoe Bay for migration. Steelhead use North Depoe Bay Creek as spawning and rearing habitat (from river mile 0.0 to 0.4), and uses the entirety of South Depoe Bay Creek for spawning and rearing habitat. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparic�n Inventories Page 21 Steelhead generally prefer fast water in small-to-large mainstem rivers and medium-to-large tributaries. In streams with steep gradient and large substrate, they spawn between the steep areas, where the water is flatter and the substrate is small enough to dig into. The steeper areas make excellent rearing habitat for juveniles. Fry use areas of fast water and large substrate for rearing (ORNHIC, 2003). Critical habitat for this species has been vacated by NOAA f sheries, pending further developments. Oregon silverspot butterfly (Speyeria zerene hippolyta) Federal status: Threatened; State status: Not listed Oregon silverspot butterfly was last seen within the vicinity of the City of Depoe Bay in 1971. That population is now considerea to be extinct (ORNHIC, 2003). However, Critical Habitat was designated in nearby Lane County in 1980, and the Recovery Plan, initially completed in 1982, was updated in 2001 (Federal Register. Vol. 66, No. 231. November 30, 2001. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service). No other occurrence of this species has been documented within the vicinity of the UGB. This species depends on coastal grasslands (salt spray meadows) that contain early blue violet (Viola adunca), This open vegetation type has always had a patchy.distribution that was maintained through wildfire, salt-laden winds, grazing and controlled burning (Federal Register. Vol. 66, No. 231, p. 59807. November 30, 2001. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service). In addition to those species documented by ORNHIC, other listed species may utilize habitat within the UGB. The City of Depoe Bay's rocky shorelines provides potential habitat for many protected terrestrial wildlife species, and its streams and riparian areas provide important habitat for numerous fish and wildlife species. Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus, Threatened) has been documented feeding offshore but does not likely utilize the fragmented mature forest habitats within the UGB for nesting and roosting. Brown pelican (Pelicanus occidentalis, Endangered) has also been documented feeding offshore. 5.6.2 Other Wildlife Habitat The coast range provides habitat for a wide variety of wildlife. The large tracts of forest to the east provide cover for many species of migratory and shorebirds and other terrestrial wildlife species. Additionally, the rocky shorelines of Depoe Bay may provide roosting habitat for pelagic birds including black cormorant, black oyster-catcher, rhinoceros auklet, common murre, tufted puffin and pigeon guillemot. Wetlands in coastal areas may provide key migration and overwintering habitat for waterfowl and numerous other species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. There was no documentation of migratory waterfowl utilizing wetland habitats at the time of survey, but birds may use these areas at other times of year (e.g., springtime migration). City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 22 5.6.3 Managed Wildlife Areas Special marine fish and wildlife managed areas (regulated by state agencies) within the UGB include Whale Cove Habitat Refuge (Intertidal Research Area) and Pirate Cove Research Reserve (Subtidal Research Area) (Oregon Deparhnent of Land Conservation and Development, Ocean-Coastal Management Program, Rocky Shores Management Strategy). Whale Cove Habitat Refuge is 0.� miles of cliffs, rocky intertidal habitat and subtidal habitat located in the southern tip of Depoe Bay's UGB. This small cove is closed to all harvest of marine fish and shellfish. The submerged and tidal lands are owned by DSL and the beaches axe owned by Oregon State Parks. The key resources for this area include rich and diverse intertidal habitat; harbor seal haulout; bald eagle use; and two nesting colony sites for pigeon guillemot. Use of the area from shore is relatively low and restricted to the nearby residents and guests on adjacent private property. ODFW has ongoing monitoring studies in the cove. ODFW manages this area as a habitat refuge and research natural area. Pirate Cove is 5.2 acres of intertidal and 3.3 acres of subtidal habitat in the northern portion of the City of Depoe Bay UGB. Pirate Cove is a very small semi-enclosed shallow embayment directly open to the ocean that provides an excellent area for both basic and applied subtidal research. Public access to this site is from the ocean only. Key resources for this area are subtidal habitat. Current uses include scientific research, scuba diving and some commercial urchin harvest. ODFW and the Urchin Commodity Commission are jointly conducting a red sea urchin outplanting experiment. There is currently no on-site management of the cove. 6.0 LWI DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 6.1 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Areas The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as part of the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) program, has mapped wetland in the study area (Figure 3). The NWI maps are generated primarily on the basis of interpretation of relatively small-scale color infrared aerial photographs (e.g., scale of 1:58,000) with limited "ground truthing" conducted to confirm the interpretations. As shown on the NWI, wetlands were mapped along the creeks and along the shoreline, including the estuary of Depoe Bay. Two palustrine, unconsolidated bottom wetlands were also mapped in association with North Depoe Bay Creek and an unnamed drainage north of Whale Cove. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands ancl Riparian Inventories Page 23 6.2 Local Wetlands Inventory Results 6.2.1 Wetland Acreage and Distribution A total of 14 wetland units were identified during the LWI with a total area of approximately 20.51 acres (Figures 4A-4B). The Whale Cove basin contains the majority (57%) of total wetland area within the UGB. Tabie 4 summarizes the wetland acreage and distribution in the study area. Table 4. Wetland Areas Within Each Basin for the Depoe Bay LWI Area 'W Watershed (acres} ' (� asin ` .._�.,�, _�... �w ., _._and North Depoe Bay Creek 544.77 5.39 1% South Depoe Bay Creek 329.42 3.5 1% Whale Cove 265.62 11.62 4% Totat Project �#.creage 1,139.81 20.51 6.2.2 Wetland Classification Each wetland was classified according to the Cowardin and Hydrogeomorphic system. Palustrine forested (PFO) wetlands are the dominant (46%) wetland type in the study area, totaling 9.38 acres. Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS) wetlands were the second most common (29%), totaling 5.87 acres. Palustrine emergent wetlands were third most common with areas totaling 5.19 acres (25%). Riverine wetlands were the least common, totaling only 0.07 acres within the UGB. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the wetland classifications for the Depoe Bay LWI study area. Table 5 is a suminary of the distribution of wetland classes within each basin. Table 6(page 25) is a classification and acreage for each wetland. Table 5. Types of Wetlands Within the Depoe Bay LWI Study Area Wetiancl Ciassification Palustrine forested (PFO) Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS) Palustrine emergent (PEM) Riverine (R) 7 Area (acres) 9.3 8 5.87 5.19 0.07 t of 46% 29% 25% 0% *Actual figure is 0.003% Ciry of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 24 Table 6. Cowardin Classification of all Wetlands Identified in the Depoe Bay LWI 6.3 6.3.1 Wetland U5FWS Wetland Classificafivn Total Code PFO PSS PEM R Acreage NDB-1 0.79 1.18 1.97 NDB-2 2.19 2.19 NDB-3 1.17 0.06 1.23 SDB-1 1.14 0.46 1.60 SDB-2 1.90 1.90 WC-lA 2.05 3.42 2.43 7.90 WC-1B 0.3 0.3 WC-2 0.36 0.36 WC-3 0.48 0.31 0.79 WC-4 0.32 0.08 0.40 WC-5 0.03 0.28 0.32 0.07 0.70 WC-6A 0.36 0.36 WC-6B 0.54 0.54 WC-7 0.22 0.05 0.27 TOTAL 9.38 5.$7 ,_5.19 0.07 20.�1 Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Results Wetland Quality Assessment An assessment of the qualiry for each of the Goal 5 wetlands identified through the inventory was conducted using the Oregon Freshwater Assessment Methodology (OFWAM) (Roth et al, April 1996). OFWAM assesses 6 functions and 3 conditions, as described in Section 3.3.1. Appendix D contains all of the results for each of the 14 wetlands assessed by the methodology along with suminary sheets of the functions and conditions assessed by the methodology and the rationale for the results. Table 7 suminarizes the wetlands within the study area. Table 7. Summary of Wetlands inventoried within the study area NDB-1 NDB-2 NDB-3 SDB-1 SDB-2 GOAL 5 WC-lA WG1B WC-2 WC-3 WC-4 WGS WC-6A WC-6B WC-7 Although OFWAM provides qualitative information on the relative value of wetlands and does not have a numerical ranking, numbers were assigned to the assessment criteria to easily compare the resuits. A number 1 was assigned to wetlands receiving the highest function or condition result (e.g. intact, diverse), a number 3 was assigned to the wetlands City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Przge 25 receiving the lowest result (lost or not present, not appropriate), and a number 2 was assigned to the results which do not fit the other criteria (potential, impacted or degraded). This system is summarized in Table 8(page 26}. Table 9(page 27)shows the results of the quality assessment conducted on all of the wetlands identified through the inventory. Some functions or conditions were not applicable to certain wetlands. For instance the methodology states that if a wetland receives an assessment of "diverse wildlife habitat" then the enhancement potential assessment is not applicable. Table 8. Key to the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Numerical Ranking V4'ildlifie H�bitat Wetland provides diverse wildlife habztat Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife species Wetland does not provide wildlife habitat l. 2. 3. 1. Wetland's fish habztat function is intact Fish Habitat 2. Wetland's fish habztat function zs impacted or degraded 3. Wetland's fish habztat function is lost or not present Water t�uaiity l. 2. 3. 1. Wetland's hydrologic control function is intact HydrUlogic Ca�[tral 2. Wetland's hydrologic control function is impacted or degraded . 3. Wetland's hydroloQic control function is Zost or not present 1. Wetland is sensitive to future impacts Sensitivity to Impact : 2. Wetland is potentially sensitive to futu�e impacts 3. Wetland is not sensitive to future impacts ' 1. Wetland has high enhancement potential Enhancement Poteutiai 2. Wetland has moderate potential fo� enhancement 3. Wetland has little enhancement potential Education Recreation Aesthetic ¢uality l. 2. 3. l. Wetland provides rec�eational opportunities 2. Wetland has the potential to provide recreational activities 3. Wetland is not appropriate fo� o� does not provide recreational oppo�tunities 1. YYetland is considered to be pleasing 2. Wetland is considered to be moderately pleasing 3. Wetland is not pleasing Ciry of Depoe Bay Local Wetlancls and Riparian Inventories Page 26 Wetland's water-quality function is intact Wetland's water=quality function is impacted or degraded Wetland's water-quality function is lost or not present Wetland has educational uses Wetland has potential for educational use Wetland is not appropriate for educational use CG v 0 a � � m C3 0 � � a .� �..i ir � � � "� � � � bA t� � G � C� ee U ..r z. � O z � � 0 0 � 0 � � � � � � � � � � � � d� 'ti � � � 3 �. � �o C� � � � �� w� �� e] y 03 a; � � � H .-, ��,�j l� G1 M � O O M �p O� O O �O � l� � ir ��--� N�D O� Ol � M[� �Y [� M V'1 N V1 �� N�� l� ZZ O O O O O O O � v � :w a� � � ��- M N M N M�-+ M N M.-� N N r-- �a � � 0 :� � N M M M�--� M N M N�—+ � M M.—+ G� � � C � � M M M M N N N M M M N M M N � � "� W. � C a� � � � „�u,, y N�.—� r-+ � N N N N N� N N M CC � � O � � w �� ... � � � .� � N N N N N N M N N N N N N N � � v o �� c� '� .... 0 ° ,�, � � M N N M��--� N N�'-. .--� M N r--� � O U � � .�., ... � � M�-+ N N N N N M�.-+ N M N N a � � � y � ,�'.. c� c� c� cd c�3 � � � � �—r .--i ,—. '—+ � � � � N N � r` � x �� 'b � N� N N�-+ N N N N N r-+ N N N �. 3x � �--� N M .--� � O � � � �=Q � � �' � U U U � � U � � � � Q Q Q � � � � � � � � � .� � O � � � r � .� � .a N �� 4 � '� � � � � � v 0 N � � � � � q 0 � U Twenty-one percent (21%) of the assessed wetlands provided diverse wildlife habitat and the other 79% provided wildlife habitat for some species. Forty-three percent (43%) of wetlands had intact fish habitat, 14% had fish habitat impacted or degraded due to lack of shade, instream structures, or channel modifications. Six (6) of the wetlands were not assessed for fish habitat. The water quality function was assessed as intact in 21% of the wetlands; impacted or degraded in 50% of the wetlands; and lost or not present in 29%. The impacted water quality function is due to lack of floodplain within the UGB, generally due to the incised nature of channels and steep stream gradient (most of the drainages run off steep slopes). Hydrologic control was assessed as intact in 43% of the wetlands, while 36% were assessed as impacted or degraded. Impacts were generally due to lack of floodplain, unrestricted outflow and downstream open space. The remaining 21% were assessed with lost or not present function. All the wetlands were considered to be potentially sensitive to future impacts due to existing or zoned development in adjacent lands. Most of the wetlands (8) were assessed with moderate enhancement potential, while 3 were not assessed due to diverse wildlife kabitat. All wetlands were given a low (not appropriate) or medium (has potential for) rating for educational or recreational opporlunities in a majority of the wetlands due to their location on private lands, lack of public access or developed paths, and safety concerns associated with public access and physically-challenged access. Aesthetic quality of the wetlands was varied according to presence of major roads and noisy traffic, adjacent development, and number of Cowardin classes in the wetland. Twenty-nine percent (29%) were considered to be aesthetically pleasing. 6.3.2 Wetlands of Special Interest for Protection Each wetland was assessed according to the ten questions in this section of OFWAM. These questions are regarding the presence of Federal or State listed threatened, endangered or sensitive species, existing management plans, conservation plans, protected mitigation areas, critical habitat, wetland reserve areas and the presence of uncommon wetland plant communities in Oregon. These questions were answered "na" for the majority of wetlands, however wetlands , immediately adjacent to North and South Depoe Bay Creek qualify as "wetlands of special interest for protection" due to essential salmonid habitat in those creeks. The following wetlands meet this criterion: • NDB-2 • SDB-1 • SDB-2 City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 28 7.0 SIGNIFICANT WETLANDS DETERMINATIUN 7.1 Distinction between Goals 5 and 17 Areas The City is divided between the Statewide Goal 5 and the Goa1 17�Planning areas. Goal 17 (Coastal Sharelands) defines the Coastal Shorelands Planning Area (CSPA) as: All lands west of the Oregon Coast Highway (Highway 101) and; all lands within an area defined by a line measured horizontally 1,000 feet from the shoreline of estuaries and 500 feet from the shoxeline of coastallakes (DLCD, 1996). For the Depoe Bay LWI, the CSPA includes all lands seaward from Highway 101 (i.e. west of Highway 101). Goa15 applies to all areas of the UGB, and can also overlap Goa1 171ands. However, if a wetland qualifies as both a Goal 5 and Goa1 17 resource, Goa1 17 takes precedence. 7.2 Goal 5 Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria On September 1, 1996, the Land Conservation and Development Commission adopted a revised Statewide Planning Goa15. Goa15 is the planning goal for natural resources, scenic and historic areas, and open spaces. The goal requires local jurisdictions to inventory the natural resources covered under the goa1, deternune the significance of these resources, and develop plans to achieve the goa1. In other word�; �oca1 jurisd.ictions must adopt land use ordinances regulating development in and around significant areas. Loca1 jurisdictions determining significant wetlands must use the criteria adopted by the Oregon Department of State Lands (ORS 197.2'79(3)(b)). These criteria identifies Locally Signifzcant Wetlands. The significance criteria is divided into three sections, as shown in Table 10. Table 10. Criteria for Determining Goa15 Locally 5ignificant Wetlands �x��i4�tsY �i. we��arid +c�n�it �ie i�i�ate� as s��';i z�t;i��e �n��. t±� a�� ; _ � � � . of t�� +��+e�i� b�1vw ts ""�es". 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining storm water b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionatly from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b) City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 29 Table 10, continued Mar�datory �,ocally Sign%�"icant tiPettand Criterir"x: A we#�and is loeally signif cant if "Yes" is th� answer to any of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat function intact, or inapacted or degraded? �tional`I�cally Signi,fiicafzt ii'etl�rid Crite�iac: local �ctvernm�nts may entify a v�ettand as signifcant if "Yes" is th�nswer to th� �riteria-below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wiZdlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function. 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses? 7.3 7.3.1 Applying Significant Wetland Criteria to the LWI Study Area Goal 5 Significant Wetlands The Locally Significant Wetlauds criteria were applied to all wetlands. T'he results of applying the criteria are included in Appendix E. These wetlands are shown in Table 11. Table 11. Goa15 Locally Significant Wetlands in the Depoe Bay LWI GOAL 5 NDB-1 WC- la* NDB-2* WGlb NDB-3* WG2 SDB-1 * WG3* SDB-2* WC-4* *Locally Significant Wetlands WGS* WC-6a'� WC-6b�` WC-7� City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 30 Based on the criteria, 11 of the 14 wetlands (78°Io) were deternuned to be significant: 2 in the North Depoe Bay Creek watershed, 2 in the South Depoe Bay Creek watershed and 7 in the Wha1e Cove watershed. The Whale Cove (WC) wetlands are technically within the Goal 17 CSPA; however, they are not included as Goal 17 wetlands only, because they do not derive their habitat quality from "association with coastal water areas" (LCDC, 1996). These wetlands met the criteria for significance because they meet one or more of the mandatory criteria. Although other wetlands within the Goa15 area are relatively valuable for some functions, they do not satisfy the significant wetlands criteria. 8.0 RIPARIAN INVENTORY RESULTS 8.1 Location, Width and Quality of Riparian Areas The Urban Riparian Inventory an.d Assessment Guide (Riparian Guide) (DSL 1998) was used to identify the width of riparian areas within the project area. The Riparian Guide is a method of determining the width of riparian areas adjacent to wetlands, creeks, and lakes (water resources). The Riparian Guide includes a riparian function assessment, which evaluates the ability of the riparian area to provide water quality, flood management, thermal regulation, and wildlife habitat functions. The results indicate whether the functional integrity of each reach is high, medium, or low. 8.2 Riparian Acreage and Distribution Twelve riparian assessments were conducted in the project area. Each riparian area was assigned a code and a watershed code (e.g. R-NDB-2). A data sheet was compiled which documents the existing riparian characteristics and establishes the riparian width based on potential tree height (PTH) and actual site conditions (Appendix F). The majority of the assessments were on-site observation. Off-site assessments were based on observation from an off-site vantage point or review of maps and aerial photos. Potential tree heights were generally based on either Sitka spruce, western hemlock (both 120-foot PTH) or red alder (65-foot PTH). Riparian areas on steep slopes were generally forested or potentially forested with the coniferous trees. Riparian areas in flatter topographic areas were generally dominated by early successional trees such as red alder. Figures 4A-4B show the location of the riparian assessments, the riparian reaches, and the width of the riparian areas. The following table summarizes the riparian area lengths and potential tree heights. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 31 Table 12. Riparian Corridors and Their Widths for the Depoe Bay Riparian Inventory 8.3 Riparian Assessment Results An assessment of four riparian functions, water quality, flood management, thermal regulation, and wildlife habitat, was conducted for each of the riparian areas. The questions and answer sheets for the riparian assessment are included in Appendix F. The riparian functions are described in Section 3.43. The riparian assessment is completed by answering a series of questions relating to the riparian functions. Each answer is assigned a score that reflects its overall importance to the function. Questions that were answered "a" received a higher score than "c" answers. After the score was totaled for each function, it was assigned a rating of high (H), medium (M), or low (L) according to the results. Table 13 summarizes the results of the riparian functional assessment. Table 13. Summary of Depoe Bay's Riparian Functional Assessments Ripar.ian �v ` Wa�er ,: Flood � � Thermal WiIdhfe =� .4: : '�Code', , Quali'' ' 1VIana ement ;: Re ulation .. ` Habifat. � R-NDB-1 H M H H R-NDB-2 H L H H R-NDB-3 H L H H R-NDB-4 H M H H R-SDB-1 H M H H R-SDB-2 H H H H R-SDB-3 H L H M R-WG1 H H M H R-WC-2 H L H H R-WC-3 H H H H R-WC-4a H L H H R-WC-4b H L H H City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 32 Riparian areas along coastal waters are extremely important for a number of reasons. Goal 17 recognizes the importance of riparian vegetation along the coast and states in the Identificataon Section that coastal shorelands should at least include "Natural or man-made riparian resources, especially vegetation necessary to stabilize the shoreline and to maintain water quality and temperature necessary for the maintenance of fish habitat and spawning areas." Due to the listing of several salmonids as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act by the National Marine Fisheries Service, protecting and restoring riparian areas has never been more important. All of the riparian areas provide a high water quality function due to a dominance of woody trees and shrubs in the riparian areas and low extents of impervious surfaces. Thermal regulation was also generally assessed with a high functional integrity, with 92% of the riparian assessed in this condition. The flood management function was generally ranked as medium or low due to steep topography within the riparian area, thereby limiting the potential for flooding. Wildlife habitat was high for 92% of the riparian areas due to the presence of perennial surface water, well vegetated areas, and lack of impervious surfaces in the study area. In general the riparian areas of Depoe Bay are in good condition. 8.4 Determination of Significant Riparian Corridors Once the location and the quality of the riparian corridors were established, we determined the significance of each resource. For riparian corridors, local jurisdictions are given a choice of implementing the "standard" Goa15 inventory process, or the "safe harbor" process, or a combination of the two. As described above, the standard inventory process was conducted using the Riparian Guide. 8.4.1 Safe Harbor The safe harbor process uses criteria already established by Goal 5 to determine boundaries of significant riparian corridors using a standard setback distance from all fish bearing streams and lakes (OAR 660-23-090(5)). These setback distances are as follows: (a) Along all streams with average annual stream flow greater than 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) the riparian corridor boundary shall be 75 feet upland from the top of each bank. (b) Along all lakes, and fish-bearing streams with average annual stream flow less than 1,000 cfs, the riparian corridor boundary shall be 50 feet from the top of bank. (c) Where the riparian corridor includes all or portions of a significant wetland as set out in OAR 660-23-100, the standard distance to the riparian corridor boundary shall be measured from, and include, the upland edge of the wetland. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 33 (d) In areas where the top of each bank is not clearly defined, or where the predominant terrain consists of steep cliffs, local governments shall apply OAR 660-23-030 rather than apply the safe harbor provisions of this section. The City can adopt the safe harbor widths of 50 feet or the standard inventory widths established by use of potential tree heigFht, as listed in Table 12. 8.4.2 Standard Inventory Table 14 presents the significance criteria for significant Goal 5 riparian corridors. Table 14. Criteria for Determining Significant Riparian Corridors 1 Does the riparian area have a hig12 water quality function? 2 Does the riparian area have a high flood management function? 3 Does the riparian area have a high thermal regulation function? 4 Does the riparian area have a high wildlife habitat function? 5 Is the riparian area adjacent to the North Depoe Bay Creek or South Depoe Bay Creek (water bodies mapped by ODFW as essential indigenous anadromous salmonid habitat)? 6 Does the riparian corridor contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the riparian area inhabited by any species listed federally as Threatened or Endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Is the riparian area immediately adjacent to a Locally Significant Wetland? Riparian areas along several streams within the City have been impacted by urban development. This is true of the two northern drainages that flow into Little Whale Cove, where roads and paths have been constructed within or across the riparian areas. 9.0 WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY RESULTS 9.1 Location of Wildlife Habitat Historically, all of Depoe Bay was dominated by a mixed coniferous forest composed of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western red cedar and Sitka spruce. This forest extended from the Coast Range to the bluffs of the Pacific Ocean. There are no old growth stands left within the City and urban encroachment has reduced the cover of forested habitat. Fewer species of birds live in the forests of the Coast Range than in other western conifer formations because the habitat offers less diversity of vegetation and fewer sources of food. The dominance of conifers means that birds preferring or requiring deciduous trees are restricted to habitats such as riparian areas and wetlands. As such, there are fewer niches for birds in coastal forests than in mixed forests. Another factor limiting the diversity of bird City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 34 species is the scarcity of food sources, such as acorns, large seeds (e.g. grass seeds) and pine nuts, which are important food sources of western forests. Grasses are generally replaced by mosses, which are less nutritious. However, birds and mammals take advantage of all parts of conifers (seeds, bark, twigs, buds, needles, cones) for food. The seeds of Douglas-fir, hemlock, and spruce, contain both proteins and essential fats. 9.2 Discussion of Wildlife Habitat Assessment Results At one tizne, the Depoe Bay area was covered by a mixed coniferous forest that provided habitat for a variety of species. With the exception of land that is zoned for commercial timber production (and adjacent residential-zoned land that has not yet been developed), this habitat has been impacted or removed. Currently the only identifiable wildlife habitat is located within riparian corridors along the various creeks and drainages, where plant species composition tends to be more diverse (Figure SA - SB). The wildlife habitat found along these creeks does not appear to extend beyond the riparian zone for any of these waterways. While also important habitat, the rocky shores along the coastlines were not assessed as habitat for the intent and purpose of this report. These areas are currently managed by the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development. 9.3 Discussion of Significant Wildlife Habitat As with riparian corridors, Goal 5 allows local governments to conduct a"standard" Goal 5 inventory process, as contained in QAR 660-23-040, or a"safe harbor" process, but not a combination of the two. The safe harbor process in Goa15 is as follows: (4) Local governments may determine wildlife habitat significance under OAR 660-23- 040, or apply the safe haxbor criteria in this section. Under the safe harbor, local governments may determine that "wildlife" does not include fish, and that significant wildlife habitat is only those sites where one or more of the following conditions exist: (a) The habitat has been documented to perform a life support function for a wildlife species listed by the federal government as a threatened or endangered species, or by the state of Oregon as threatened, endangered, or sensitive species; (b) The habitat has documented occurrences of more than incidental use by a species described in subsection (a) of this section;� (c) The habitat has been documented as a sensitive bird nesting, roosting, or watering resource site for osprey or great blue herons pursuant to OAR 527.710 (Oregon Forest Practices Act) and OAR 629-24-700 (Forest Practices Rules); (d) The habitat has been documented to be essential to achieving policies or population objectives specified in a wildlife species management plan adopted by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission pursuant to ORS Chapter 496; City of Depoe Bay Loca1 Wetlancls and Riparian Inventories Page 3S (e) The area is identified and mapped by ODFW as habitat for a wildlife species of concern and/or as habitat of concern (e.g. big game winter range and migration corridors, golden eagle and prairie falcon nest sites, or pigeon springs). To determine whether the study area contains significant wildiife habitat, PHS reviewed the safe harbor criteria and conducted a standard inventory of wildlife habitat, as described in the sections above. The results determined that: • no rare, threatened, or endangered species are found within the study area; • all wildlife habitat polygons are located within riparian corridors; • the highest quality habitat is found within the riparian corridors of North and South Depoe Bay Creeks and in the wetland mosaic in the northern part of the Whale Cove watershed, and • the poorest quality habitat is found within the denser urban areas throughout the city It was determined, however, that wildlife habitat within riparian corridors is already protected through the regulation of riparian corridors and significant wetlands. For this reason, PHS applied the safe harbor criteria for significant wildlife habitat. When these criteria are used, none of the polygons surveyed within the study area can be deemed significant. 10.0 SHORELINE The construction of residential lots along the ocean front within the City requires the prevention of coastal erosion. The allowed lot area, as stated in the City's zoning ordinance, is the amount of area from the line of inean high water to the landward extent of the property. When ocean front development is proposed, the applicant must determine whether the area is geologically stable (i.e. whether a geologic hazard exists as identified in the Environmental Hazards Inventory, Coastal Lincoln County, Oregon. RNKR Associates, 1978). Page 35 of the RNKR report lists the minimum setbacks recommended for each category of coastal erosion (slight: 45o from the mean high high tide (MHHT), moderate: 25o from the MH�iT, or severe: 20 from the MHHT). PHS attempted to map the limits of the apparent stable "top of bank" using our observations in the field and using the aerial photograph. Unfortunately, little access to ocean front lots was granted and the scale of the aerial photograph does not allow the accurate mapping of this important feature. As such, this report does not inventory a setback that the city can use for ocean front development. Discussions with DLCD representatives and planners from several coastal communities determined that no simple mapping solution appears to exist along the Oregon coast. One method that is successfully used along rivers and streams within the Portland Metropolitan area is to determine site-specific setbacks based on the degree of slope present on the property. For the City of Depoe Bay this could mean that a minimum setback is established from the MHHT. Once this minimum setback distance is reached, the degree of the slope is determined and setback is evaluated based on the severity of the slope. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 36 For the Portland Metropolitan area, the setback continues until there is a break in slope (i.e. less than 25%). At this point, the setback is increased another 35 feet (or 15' feet with a geotechnical report stating that the ground is stable). This continues until the maximum setback distance of 200 feet is reached. 11.0 FORESTED LANDS Approximately 622 acres of lands within the UGB of Depoe Bay are forested (Figures 6A - 6B). The U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station's 1946 Douglas-fir potential productivity study classified all western Oregon forest lands on the basis of five site classes with site class I being the most productive and site class V being the least productive. The rnajority of the forest lands within the City of Depoe Bay are site class III lands, which means they have a productivity of at least 121 cubic feet of timber per acre per year. This is a productive capacity deemed adequate for commercial forest use; through modern intensive forest management practices, considerably higher yields are expected (Inventory Information: City of Depoe Bay, 1991, pp. 1-2). Within the City of Depoe Bay, the majority of forested lands (55%, or approximately 344 acres) are zoned as Timber Conservation zones (T-C), which are owned by Boise Cascade Corporation and managed for commercial timber production. By designating commercial timber lands which lie within the UGB as suitable for timber production (i.e., "Forest Land") rather than zone those lands for residential development, this open space will be managed to preserve open space values (Inventory Information: City of Depoe Bay, 1991, p.3). Areas within the UGB that are currently forested but not zoned T-C are zoned for residential development (R-1 through R-5) and/or light industrial (L-1) and will potentially be cleared as the need for additional urban lands arise. 12.0 OPEN SPACE Water areas appropriately constitute the most important visual open space for residents and visitors to Depoe Bay (Figures 7A - 7B). Visual access to these spaces are provided by extensive Oregon State Park holdings and by US Highway 101, including the highway bridge. The dish-shaped lands surrounding the historic inner harbor provide via slope many commercial and residential views. Two public parks exist within the designated urban growth boundaries of Depoe Bay. These are: • The Depoe Bay City Park and Boat Launch Ramp. This park is located on the southern edge of the inner harbor. The park provides restroom and picnic facilities. The boat launch ramp provides ocean access for privately owned, trailer-transported boats. It is a busy facility during summer months. Other city parkland along the oceanfront consists of 3.35 acres at the seawall in the City. The facility provides views of the channel into the inner bay and access to the basaltic intertidal area to either side of the channel. The day use area provides tourist and resident recreation opportunities. Its central location has important economic benefits for the City's tourist-oriented businesses. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 37 13.0 STAFF QUALIFICATIONS John van Staveren: President/Natural Resources Division; Senior Scientist; Professional Wetland Scientist Project Role: Project Manager Proj ect Responsibility: Contract negotiations, monthly billing Wetland and riparian inventory field work and assessment Public presentations Quality control Regulatory agency coordination John van Staveren has managed over 600 wetlands-related projects, including 21 local wetland inventories; conducted over 750 wetland delineations; testified at numerous public hearings; and provided expert witness testimony. He served as technical advisor to two Citizen Advisory Committees responsible for establislung criteria for the determination of significant wetlands for purposes of Goa15 and the determination of significant natural resources for purposes of Goal 17. John van Staveren served on two Oregon Division of State Land's Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) responsible for developing statewide policy on wetlands. These TACs are to establish statewide criteria for determining locally significant wetlands for Goa15 and to establish a payment option for wetland mirigation. He was a Wetlands Expert team member providing analysis of the OFWAM, and was a reviewer for the latest revision to the methodology. He has conducted a riparian inventory of Dunes City, Florence, and Reedsport. He has managed dozens of Section 404 and Removal-Fi11 permit projects for wetland fills; designed dozens of freshwater and estuarine wetland mitigation projects; and drafted rivo local land use ordinances regulating development activities within natural resource areas. Fred Small: Wetland Scientist, Botanist Project Role: Botanist, Wetland Scientist Project Responsibility: Wetland and riparian inventory field work and assessment Plant identification and cataloging Report writing Fred Small has a bachelor's degree in biology with strong emphasis in botany. Fred has delineated over 100 wetlands; played a role in several large scale local wetland inventories; conducted rare, threatened, endangered plant surveys for sites in the Oregon Cascades, Willamette Valley, and Oregon Coast. Caroline Rim: Project Role: Proj ect Responsibility: Wetland Scientist, Field Biologist Wetland Scientist Wetland and Riparian inventory field work and assessment Aeria1 photo interpretation Report writing Caroline Rim has a bachelors degree in biology and is a wetland scientist with experience in LWI and riparian inventory field investigations, wetland delineations, interpretation of aerial photographs, and technical report writing. She has played a major role in several LWIs. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories PaQe 38 Shawn Eisner: Wetland Scientist Project Role: Wetland Scientist Project Responsibility: Wetland and riparian inventory field work and assessment Quality control and editing Report writing Data input Shawn has Bachelor's degrees in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Shawn provides specialized support pertaining to wetland delineations, determinations, and monitoring; stream and natural resource assessments and environmental permit processing. He conducts field work and data collection for Local Wetland Inventories and is involved in report preparation and wetland/riparian assessments. Michele Eccleston: Wetland Scientist Project Role: Wetland Scientist Project Responsibility: Wetland and riparian inventory field work and assessment Report writing Michele Eccleston has delineated numerous wetlands and prepared wetland mitigation plans. She has conducted an LWI and riparian inventory in Bandon and helped conducted OFWAM, data collection and wetland characterization. Jane Le Blanc: Technical Editor Projec.t Role: Technical Editor Project Responsibility: Graphics Report editing, formatting and layout Data input Jane Le Blanc is a technical editor and provides permitting support for PHS. Her duties include formatting and editing wetland reports, proposals, and letters as well as data input. Tom Rodgers: Project Role: Proj ect Responsibility: AutoCAD and Arc-Info Specialist Cartographer Mapping Graphics Tom Rodgers is a computer graphics specialist, with experience in the production of Local Wetlands Inventories. He is proficient with AutoCAD Map, Arc-View and Arc-Info programs. He has prepared the maps for several LWIs and coordinated with Planning Departments and Council of Governments to ensure that map products and digital information is compatible with local operating systems. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 39 14.0 PROJECT SI:fPVIMARY • Pacific Habitat Services was hired to conduct a Local Wetlands Inventory and Riparian Inventory for the City of Depoe Bay. • The project area is approximately 1,140 acres, and includes North and South Depoe Bay Creeks and several smaller tributaries. • Field work was conducted between September and October 2003. Each wetland unit was assigned a unique code based on the hydrologic basin. A wetland characterization and wetland assessment was completed for each wetland unit. The wetland assessment was based on the Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology. • The study area includes both Goa15 and Goal 17 planrung areas. • Locally Significant Wetlands (Goa15) were identified based on Oregon Administrative Rules. • A total of 14 wetland units were identified in the Depoe Bay project area, with a total acreage of approximately 20.44 acres of wetland. • Palustrine forested (PFO) wetlands are the dominant (39%) wetland type in the study area, totaling 7.98 acres. Palustrine scrub-shrub (PSS) wetlands were the second most common, totaling 7.18 acres (35%). Palustrine emergent wetlands (PEM)were third most common with areas totaling 5.21 acres (26%). • Three of the wetlands met the criteria for "wetlands of special interest for protection." • Eleven of the fourteen Goa15 wetlands met the criteria for Locally Significant Wetlands. • The riparian inventory assessed 12 areas associated with North Depoe Bay Creek, South Depoe Bay Creek and numerous tributaries to these creeks. • Riparian widths in the project area range from 65-to-120 feet, based potential tree height. • All of the riparian areas were assessed with at least one function (water quality, flood management, thermal regulation, wildlife habitat) as having high functional integrity. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlancls and Riparian Inventories PaQe 40 15.0 REFERENCES Beeson, M.H., Peritu, Rauno, and Perttu, Janice, 1979, The oragin of the Miocene basalts of coastal Oregon and Washington: An alternative hypothesis: Oregon geology, v. 41, no. 10, p. 159-166 • Brinson, Mark. 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. Wetlands Research Program. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington D.C. City of Depoe Bay, 1982. Depoe Bay Comprehensive Plan. Adopted June 22, 1982. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, FWS/OBS-79/31. 103 pp. Environmental Laboratory. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1). (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1987). Federal Register. 1982, Title 33: Navigation and Navigable Waters, Chapter II, Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers, Vol. 47, No. 138, p31810, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Franklin, Jerry F and Dyrness, C.T. 1973. Natural Yegetation of Oregon and Washington. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Portland, Oregon. Land Conservation and Development Commission, 1996. Statewide Planning Goals S and 17. Amended Administrative Rules OAR 660, DSL 23. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 1996. DEQ's 1994/1996 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Waterbodies & Oregon 's Crateraa Used for Listing Waterbodies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Tony Stein. Personal communication, September, 2003. Oregon Division of State Lands, 1998. Urban Riparian Inventory and Assessment Guide. Reed, Porter B., Jr. 1988 (May). Nataonal Last of Plant Species That. Occur tn YYetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, FL. NERC-88/18.37. Roth E.M., R.D. Olsen, P.L. Snow, and R.R. Sumner. 1996. Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology. Ed. by S.G. McCannell. DSL. Salem, OR. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands ancl Riparian Inventories Page 41 Snavely, Parke D.,1987, Depoe Bay: Geological Society of America Centennial Field Guide- Cordilleran Section , v. 1, p.307-310 0 U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, 1997. Soil Survey ofLincoln County, Oregon. U.S.D.A., Soil Conservation Service, 1989. Oregon Hydric Soils by Counties. U.S.F.W.S. National Wetlands Inventory 7.5-minute quadrangle map, 1982, Depoe Bay, OR, 1:58,000 U.S.G.S. 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle, 1984 Provisional Edition. Depoe Bay, OR, 1:24,000. City of Depoe Bay Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventories Page 42 � �� v� • µ� ��. , , _ .,, .. . _ � � � ; � y '+f W � � � � � r�..l �. ,«__ ___ � � � � � � , � �'. � V) �M1i �.s .�..�.�. � \i�...... . � � � 12/12/03 / "' � . -. . � . � .. „ _ : , ....t. ; :. ' �"-. � .f ._.. . ,� , . . ._. . . -. , . . . . .. . .. . ,... . —. _ _. . �>. � � '�.....��.-.,," . , ., .. } , ' x' Ri�3t.lift E3�Y . , ,'.' , :. , i=' <.:.>, _. , STz�'I'E tb'AY.^-.t�'3� � � �' ;�� 3 � P tt � � . �.. . . .._ . . . . . � ..., . �. __..._ . . _ .._. , �.,�� .,,... , - _ _ �"u�' � IIW1��- �1f�f�;;"IIWIrF r�' ��=w� � i� , ....« �e-- � ...�. ....- ...o.... � ' � r/�� „e�f � ' • `•� . � x . _ T :. '\.. . _ ..�__: � f,�` � .. ��.. '� ° . . . g _ . �,. :.. . ; ' . . . ... �� -"��'� � I SITE �,, j':{:T'tXiY r:t8<i:.. . C, �� ; � (, i � , F �. Y . � • �.. : � .. ... .. . � ..,,,,. F,. .� .. -�` . . . . . __. : � _,...._.. „_ . _-_ __._ __ { �:: . �,r� F Y _. , 1• . � :; � L`i j �� E ,�� F �•' � - �' � �'r,�:�z�csr� . _ �.. , ; - � � , - , � . �� ,,, , r. � yl m — 9 � fi �i � . . 4' . �I �k' _ f .� �7. . , y 4 :. • � F ' . � „ . , ., ^e. : oErczF nnv x • • - ,. •.. . .� " _ ,, , - ' 4TATI- 1tA4'61T)� • •�.��• • . •� , � • ` � r � � Sf'c.0 � H... 4� � :� .. . s � , � ,�d � r � . . { � £��.^�.i. , . •. . : 17e �� e S�� . � : � ` =; _ . .. � ��.�'' _ ' __�.... . _ �..� �� : ___ �: _�� t ;� ��t,`��ry� �`-� � � �. � �� . ' � . 1 I �Z ... � f � � � . i "• • t i : . :., • ' �,.� .'�� . _ � ...,., x... • . . � � ;. � — _ ' �`':i:.. . ... ' 6 � �� ' � S y a��Y � �, -� .,� . . , , ,,., � F F _ � � . ' .f;.P, ; '=, :...... _,-,.� . __ -,�� .,.,, . _ ��`(�� . _. ... ...., ._ _,_. . , ' . _.. .. � ...... . ... ..,,..... . . , . ..... . , .. w� . • . '� ' � .I .a i : ' �� . � �� . . �", . � � ..�.� � �..,..� _, .�.. , � ...� ,' . � .� . ,.. .._,. - � �k �� F1 `— — — — — — � — — : � �;...� . , a �-,. . . � , _. � , - � { #� �, € : I M�,.: � � �,� � � � � -., �� : ��, ,y . {`.3 : �5 _ �. �.. � '�'. � � • � �' ... r` .� ,. �i.�bx�.fP C:e9,b. ��,�� ,��=� � . � �. i ...:._.'�. -, ��..:: . � , - . f � � �� ... � , ' - -. = ... �. - � t.. . I �� : (� /' '��C;.:� � . �P. jt ` . `f � .. � . . . . _, .,,F - . . . `.: r .. � . ). . � .. .. :. .:. ' . `� � .� , . .': . . . . , . , '� . -, . ' .. � . , i . . . ; ,l . .. . j - ' = ' � _�s� _ � ,_ F. 2853 Location and general topography of a Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventory in Depoe Bay, Oregon (USGS, Depoe Bay quadrant, Provisionai Edition, 1984). FIGURE 1 � �HS�� _p�rifir Nahitat Cnrvirvc Tnr //, 45� �� , ..?c . F, �� ;; �.�; � �� ; f� � I 12I12/03 a ., 2853 I Soil series for a Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventory in Depos Bay, Oregon (SCS, Soil Survey of Lincoln County, Oregon 1997, sheets number 14 and 17) FIGURE 2 � H �[� —Ponifir �I�F�i4�4 CPrarirnc Tnr .r--� � � � ,� �:+�`.`..�'� i`�. : � � .i. �4�fi�� ,�` �� : � SITE SOIL MAP UNITS 3C Bandon fine sandy loam, 3-12% slopes 3E Bandon fine sandy laam, 12-50% slopes 4A Beaches, 1-2% slopes 14B Depoe loam 13G Fendall-Templeton silt loam, 35-60% slopes 22C Gleneden silry clay loam 35E Lint silt loam, 5-25% slopes �2C Nelscotf loam, 3-12% slopes 42E Nelscott loam 12-50% slopes 45E Neskowin-Salander silt loam, 55-35% slopes 45G Neskowin-Salander silt loam, 35-60% slopes 46A Nestucca silt loam, 0-2% slopes SSE Temnleton-Fendall silt loam. 5-35% slones /J� . �. .. � c` ', 7 I/ i � � �.,� = � . : . . 1"\ '�..� ` ~" .. I� � '� � 4 . - y , � ' 1�t7.ci� `.,� � ..ha`3.'}1 iN � : .. 3i_,'t �� ' " '.' � � . , � n "� x ,�S a : � r . €: .'i ; _ � � � , _ . ._.._... ,. -._ . .._ e:�:- f�.r r� �r � �:"� � T � -: . -, . w � ._> � . — P � . . �. . .. , .. . . . . .......1- . . . _ �. � - � � . . , .- ' /� - •.a � a / � - � t t , . ... ; ., : '. ,% '' ' ;:�3 . C,.., � .�. . � (` }\ . , �` � r_ � _ � �.: __ . . . " .. - ... � :�';�- asc tl .. {1 �C�1PSN — � ---- c . �t} �� I �,.. , . "t �;C_. , �.� \ \ ,�.- ' �/ � , .�� , � -_.::; ,`� � SITE . .� .�.� & � ;1 •' , � �� .t� . . ".?�Yi... 4 a.. J'`i .. � / ��i � � � �""�� . f ' .. �:... _ ' , °, '"� � � A � �,. �, . .... .. _ . .. % , _. .. _ .,�... . _ _.�� .�., y. �b ,• _ . ."` . �.._ , f`. , . . . " � a �, �"na� �1'li,-r .�.�.:�5 x , . � � r" ��"�,-- u;1 � �� , z„� Y ,;a� ,�.- :.�, �� tS �,�z��n� ; ---! �. ......._. _ ...................... '/ ; o t ` ' t . , ... �"� :`"�>d..r E . j 3 $ � �� .. ,,' . � � � : ��Csii?}il 12/12/03 , . �.'A.�;,;y ._. .,..__..,...... _ , .�:�___ .. _. � . ,��, ��`� t�:1�n�N r � '!"*,. 1 ,� �"^~�£��,��. R i�� / 4 3 v i �,� 4 L � ( s `. P !. �� f � .r �� r � � £� . � n �: . , �? �. -, .� ... � � � i' . . :.5 t �� I �� ( r, . . r�-�� - � f� � - � � ��- � z, � � � -� `��''� � � .� : �,, _ ;= = r, . � " � ` , . �� ! "_ } .., r . . �� ° � ,�, �; � �;; � � ; '( � ; �� y 4 � \ ,../ � � /� .� / i � £ 4 � . � ; .,� i� � ', ' � � � � �, ^ �' \ �r r f a 41, ' � ..'; £ 3°.,� " r' iSL'. �� . � �� 4 •"Y :^�� l;';: /;^". � d y .I � i �% 4,, ,.. � � � . , � � r ' .`� -� J� `� . a �{, T I p�,,� � l „ �ti.�.."`.�' '^"T��f' f ; a ' °" � �I 6 � �, � � i�` j ,. _r `� /! � -^rT - "� , .� '" � . ` ��, - � � �/ .i!""^.. �• i�iJ�C', c..:�—"• �� - � „- �" =' "�-` � �: � �. i, �--...: ��. .- w. - �,. ; � � _ 4 . . , f , > � � K ` � � � �f � �� . �'�� ".,` . � � , / �- ' � \ ! R�i o3� �- � .. i ,\ . � i" .0 :l�`'� �. � . i� 3 . . .. . � �. -. . . ' � . , . , . �-: / . � . .. . . . . . . . . � t � � . � 2853 National Wetlantls Inventory information for a Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventory in Depoe Bay, Oregon (USFWS, Depoe Bay, Oregon quadrangle, 1995). FIGURE 3 � a _Parifir Aahitat CPrvirPC Tnr �.�.T� — -- ... � .___ ..�.a i : `.' ..� �,.: ' —�—��- , -.L-;�l . ND13-2 North Depoe Bay Creek {NDB) ,� ': • �H-NDB-2 ;;; . . . .. �i.. .�1� �� NORTH DEPOE BAY CREEK ��—or�N wn•r�x��s�xvo� 7 } T"w �! , 9 ny � I�-Sll6-1 DEP�]E BAY CREEK I �.; '�::r s :. .�.��°- ry' � R-SDB-I _, ti�; :' . SOUTH DEPOE�I3AY CREEK GRAPHIC SCAI13 _ . � r Tffi8 YAP IS POS PWIi1�7G PURPOBBB O1PLY n � y � �� 11S1iJND HO11N�ll�8 1B6 �PPNOYOIAlE ho�Ok Home.v/u9B 1NWed � ANA 811B76GR TO C91NGB ]nformatlon ahown on thie map {s tor plaonin� purpoess ou�y and �tl.W� �— —— e,owr. rw.e p W evr m n.� wetland In[armatlon ie enb eet ta ahan�a Sbera m�y he unmeppsd � � � �ma�y tar ea�. ��r a pm� wm m� vvpa weHende sab�eoL to n�als sad ell xeFJend bmmdar� meppin� le � up..�.ae � r.ee .ed ne,.tqm�t eppro�mste. In aLL aesa� sotad Aaid aoaditlams detee'mlue �retknd r�ea cee� NOB-1 �� R-NDB-1 bouodarie�. You u�a rddaad to aont�at tLa ➢eprrtmsak ot 8t�ta Lnnds end tha 0.8. Ca r ot wlth ata DA lE• Ocfobe , 7(A73 n p P�o1Rlo HaWtaE $erviae�,lpa 9ASf MAP 1NF0: �acl b LY b ae L�� D l. B ay � '�°� �"1°� �� Sheet .L � eh.nm [eaq sro-oeoo � �. �8.� Local W�tlands and Riparian Inventory � ,; of: 2 I , S �� a � ��. U�'°m`� f .. R r _. . I - j � �x-Soa-2 � y . �,'-.r � , �;,� t snn-z–.-..-��,� ?&� � � � Creek (SDB) ,�``' r'.°��' � ` '� ' I �, � `� � � � R-sn�a 3AY CREEK ��'. — R-SDH-] J?�K *�awe�d Bwod�e� . _....- AIpKI�n �rr . ... P�n�Ot B�d�v/v� �WOd � �� "'' — — — rroo.w. r.srpa rw N �� NDB-] � � R-A11]R-I vA7E-• aeroaer, 7003 BASf AIAP lNf�• 57�bd 6r Cltv af GRAAf�C SCAtE w.r m nw � �� Depoe Ba� 7'$16 Y1P 19 FO& PL►NN[!tG PUAPO� OMIB 11BTfIND BDUNDi1�8 lBB 1PPR0%bfAA'lB AND 8UB1&,T 7'0 C9ANU6 Infnrmalton ehowa on Ehfe map L for P�ni Pm'Pceee anu snd FrkLnd In[orm�tlon i� subjaat to eLanaa. '1'haea onq La unmappad wetLnde eu6�eot W rejalatiae and �II wetJ�nd bamdary m�pyln� 1� epprodmab. In all oaeee, aokasl tlald co¢dltfone determina weUand 6oundarlee. You sre eGvleed tn anntact the ➢epartment o[ S1aG Iande end khe U.9. Ca ■ of wlkh r. . � p�aii[lc HabitaL bkrviae�,Ina. �� Sheet: 2 — -�- - �h78 NQ: 7853 Local Wetlands and Riparian Inventary �`� �f 2 �illl�l.l��.'r:.i,. , ! i ! l l l l �,. E ' � �v�; ; ! �..'_`�— fI,',l.'Il.i � t , ',I 11 � Ill �� , , illll!.I_Il! � � ; l l l i�. i�� l F��_ �� , �, if��.l,!1i� � , , � : �I l�lll.l�..l'��;� a I'�lllli.l l.!I,� '' �'�� l`llll�.11.�lll � 1 � I��'l�1�1111. `'', �� Ifl!'�II.�I?" � 1� l l�llll'.l!ll � i i I�! ! 1_ ��, l� 1 f � `�� 1 ��— 1 1 ��,�I!7,1�.',i, U 1 illl,l ll,.'. E�} j�i ;�� '� E 1 i', �' l k ; �-�; I' 't� � �1� � �i�71�'I � i f � Ill l 1 ' r ��' P''t i _ ��.�,1��e �,�� i. i i l I I l�. l :! ��.�� y�' �� Illl�l�li li��,'�li�li �� il'.�lil. fll ,� i � , I,Il�i�l�lll '� 1 � �!� � � � � I I. ', I', i 1 �� lliiili' l �� ll,l Il,,, ,{ � III,1��..1 f; ~� I.II�I.. ,Ili l',p�' � �!;!� ��l��.I�.�I.'�.�!!� �`. 1�'IVI! I'II.. � ll !!��1 . ' l��l�i�l 111�1i�ll�ll l�lll '� � illl�;� �.I l:l�,�l� � 'jl�li�,i;l�il�.i�. �il � ' l..,i�il�il l . 'l �. l. I I � , � , ,I I, -- ,�F��.�l�ll 'li'�I�Ilill ? l 1_ �'�, I. i. i� l�il�'lil�lil�. l'l l�li.� ii l ll!Il�l.��ll_l �7��i��.1 :!, l��l Illll �.11l�l�lidllll llll',l��lll '�1 �ll� � ilitl'. l' ' �i�'� i��.l � ll �� ) �17, � ', I 1 1 l 1_ l� �� —r �, �; � , ; � �, ' � '.'_'.'',�lt!Illl I'il l�,', 0 36� 700 14D0 � � � 1 �, j I scn[,� nv eB�r '�� l l i �, ; � , i!1 1 il � � , � , ` J r , , r I , . ' l ' � I I ,` I � . I `� �li �''��i�ili�li�.11li,p�l.l �J s.l��l�:iii�"�II�I.I�Iiti�.lt��ll�� "�,,� ��;I�I i�IG�li l_I��I � ', �; �,`� '� I '. l, . i. l. l�.',1 . l l I I. l� l� ! r �,'�' /`i�l�,�'��.lt1i��_� '�1! ��1�11�.��,lil� �� i''��'�II��,�11'1��. �+ ;'11�1.11!�illl ; — %i�.11l�'�,1�'�,lll. � 1 �il,ll,llil�.il.',l � �,�'�iii ',��''�,1�� ' "1�� 1111 I�``l�li �,�I.�.' �l � � C� / �� I 1 1 J �f , , , �� i1,�� 111 � � � � � i � < < i � ; ,� ,��; , 1 i �� ;--� �� / � = __ hn� M� iN. P�Jeot m � F+�t�kvn tk. OnKoa Reterahed Houndary------- Project Houndary/UGB/Citp Limite llildlite Aree � ; ;�;� Eet�arine and Near �SLore Sabitat� Netland Outaide of lf'adlite prea � f1ATE.� !J£CEA�B£R, 20P3 BASf MAP lNFO.� 5uPA i I I —_-- �---- - v� __ _ _ ' � � � j,,�, {�� '�':��,� ��:�"� ' ,.`__ f ; �.:.�,,.` .,� �.� ..". .'� '� �•, "'y•'r' .;1 '�, . , '.�.\ �_�;,. ,I �,� , � N �,� ;, �'�',A , ,' `I � _�`, ';+; `� J � k` • 2, ��j • '• .`�! 1 •� •�p l i�;;.;,;:• � �� • `'ti : ; .j '�j � �'. ,;�, ` •'; `,�:�+ ;'� .�' _ ,--- �_ -� '�'� �:•':� � ,�-'�^ ',;.',.•.��: �� `�, �� . �`� _.-++.,, �._.. , .I:• •• i �_i' _... �:;� I J �� il�ll.i. ll�ll', North Depoe Bay Creek (NDB} ` ��' � ___ � i � �``�i .:�•: •:� /� •�� WHA-�,-" ` ; � f , : .f 'Y / � _ _ _ . � ,` �.�� `' \' r� �'� �� -� ��,�,•. :;:�� ,� : ''ti''r. , �' i / f- � . ; .; } � J � ;/, � +, � ':f� 'r-- w•�'.:� � �� —� �,�;.�:�:.: �,�• + � :..�;f= ��;�' � I I__�tG�,�:�:t:�,Ji � I� .��J`� `�` � r,`� �-- i �� .}}�' I I r' — i �:�y`; : } r;T I � �:� � �.. � ; ``��`�I . . . b � `• ��.�'7 .� � ;•� �� ,..•:�: . , i � �� t9.: :::�.:: 1� ,, j��` '. � �.,.» �' � ` ..,. � � �.. � ; '' -��; : ��F — � � � : •:•:r ,�=u— .. . � ��I �' � ' �:'� ^�i ��I � .#} .,-r.�.'' ''';':;i } •a� WHA-��'� '� ��'�' f.',: ' a:'.� x WHA-4 ; . l•: ��yf ',�. �.��-- i ��r• ''� •� �:. •. , . .•;�j ��/ ��:: �� :�a. ,�: . , j 1+ '`;; •'�� i �;.� . . . Yi'� r� �ILD LIFE �AREAS Depoe Bay Tffi9 YSP IS F17R PLANN[NG PURY0�3 ONLY � Ho�.� � ��a�� ANp SUBJEGT TO CHANGE f.aformsdan r6own on tA1e suap 1s foe P��al' P�Posae au�p and xetland informatloo ia enbject ko chan`e. There mqy 6e uqauspped wetlsnde eubjxt la re�ulation md all weUend bonndary mappin` fa approslmat�. Ia �71 cuee, sctnal fleld aondlttooi detarmine watlend bomdsriae. You �ee advleed to wntact the Dlvis3aa ot State I�ade wd �B ��.; 1�, Local Wetiands and Riparian Inventory �;,;.;,; a� �``�t;: De oe I a Creek SDB p � y { } ,,. I ��_... tiie aabitat Seavicea,Ina. � ��. �.. �. t� n.�u., or� a�ma ..«��.� � �A P,H�� ,� � �, ', � i !. 1 I i _� f —� i • S�, "" ' �� ` '� '� __— ,v � � � I— � , t .h-'-� ' c��s ' ��; i i ' l l�l 1 �I 1 �' �-�� r � �.—� --� �� -�,� ' �, � � ,. � I. l 1 I � 1 � � � � �—f_� - 1 � �`� � � �°--�--; � - � `+. d__ i � � 1 l � I l � � ��-' ::�'� ��': ��i �Ii — I, `=� , �,,r 1 1 � l i i?' `�-- � `.�� '`�J �� '� f' i i i 1 �� ' � l �� ; ; ��?+�'� , I, ' ' �� . � J , � 6 ` � ,: :•: :�: :��'� � � l �. � . � ; i . . � I 1 � 1 �_ !--I —� � ti; ,.y. ' _.� � � � � �� I � .�+��. el � � I � I. � � i Y i �l i n �' �r� 3" '�� ; E � �L� �� , - , . • .s ' l.'l '. . l � �;. 1 s I �' i l � ^ �� I � � 1 � ' � i 1 ` { r. . . �� n_— .. � � ��. .. � I �} I I 1 I -I I � << I l l � r 1 �l l � 1 �l l � l � � ��i1 � �� `�1 �� ' i � � : � �� '� ,��µ��` I WHA-4 : '>:v: l � � 1 ��i 1 1 I � �., �� ` 1 �'�— � � 1� — � �;. � � -: ` l 1 I ' �.� J . , ` ��;� , � ._��1 �.r: '': I !.•:':''•'� � .•.•. `•. '� .--°�' I l 1 I 1 l� l''� 1 �_�,ati� ''�:;,`. ,.� ! �:;. .'��.' l l l l l I �� l � �a �, �,• ,�., '� wt�.a-a , , �{ `w, '*� •.�..+ , .; l 1 . I l � � � � �'� � � '� , fi�l � . � : ':;�-' ` i j ' �,, ! � ' ;•, �,- 'r '" .� I � l, l l l Y�' �:; .�E�:. �. l t a I l l l 1 l l l l.1 11 l� � �� , �.; •.,.` � �' iI� �1'.'.! �1'�'. �� ,1 r � �, �.�;\WHA�S „ i, l l � �, e � �, . , � � � �. � � �l �f. � � � I _ � � � ' �`�S ; *1 � ,:'........,.. � , i � i .. i � 1 �l I� � �1 li ll i � �— ...� ,— .--i-_�� : � �� ,� ;� '�I I 11�� 1 1 I'11'11'� � ��. 1 l l � l l '��. :�� .,� I� , l I. l l 1.'� _�4 . l 1 l l. i. �. l l l'� I 1.1 l� �'� � ,' �: :-.� I llll�lll�.��.1� �If��l'�,1.�.1'.l�'il� � � �'ti r Iila�li 111i 1 � '� i�. �ill�� =� � ��'� �. � , �'�. I � . � . . � I �;�; . ;•;•: � 'S / ,k �il! i �li �` ll ''I - �'�: I ! � . �. � l � � � � � � I � r � . � I ett• � . 1 � :i -:�_� ..�. 1 I � r . �r i I I � i E I , ��' .� � J� . l 1 l� . . 1 '�� , :" :':�.. outh De oe Ba Greek SDB ., ,, ';�: . , �. ��:.. p Y ( ) . I I I � I I ! i i � �' � ._1 >�,..,., � � — �� _� i � � .; � ,��1 . I l l i I �� I � � � � �,� . � "� �� '�awt�A-6 � �� ,,�� `/// -- "�i . �r� f � 1 ' Y �i - /— '� ,J I( i � I I' . I __ T _ J [ ,� ..�,� ..�L_ �. J ��!,� l �, r � +�# I i L */ I � � i i ' � I l l l ,� �� ' 1 �� ' I t � . 1 . l �� j`:; :ti� ' WHA-7 • I � � � WHA-5 �� ; , �, l 1 I l �� `�'• . . - �i .� � � — , `,�� .�� . �'•' I f rf• � �'.� a . � � �' e r , .,. � � �E . i � ��_ :., , � �•:�: :�. , J I� � %�� ::; �� + -� -- .�.• I '��: � r ��.�: . . � t . . � . i :'� �__� � � � � , J ll I l I I -� � _..� •.,.','.• �, ,I ` I �.�.�,�.�;�'�'� � � -� : ,r: f.• >� i r: .•.•.•: ; : : . .,. ..... � � � .�•., . i � � . `� � 1 I 1 __ , "¢�/ "''•��;?:« ''` ;-; ; :':•:f u�,,"l�r` � ❑ "`' ! = ' ; Y ' � � ' � — ` ' �;� ��;�. . / � • " � � , , � :�''' ,� � !R �� r 1 " :�S l I � � � �—.� � � � � :,, � , � � � �� d� � � ! � --�`: �`�' I �?' , �� r— �Y �1 . . ...... �: a , � , le C . -_ 1 � � � , . . . .•:7 av . . _ . . . . . . .. , ~--� •.�-. ; � e 'WC . . ..... `-- --`, .r;�'--, °�� ,'�. �`� :�;�=�-_ ;' � ) � ;'' `��.v: � � �,�,, I�� _ ', � .� � � �F � � ��r --�� i e _� -- --�--a._..�,� _. r . . I i . . � i �,� � �;�}+ ;' � � �� ! ` �� -- --�— --- � �,,� _ , :��_``�-~ - , , _ , � � � �� f, � , i, 1 1, r f � �� '� ,,..rr�� — - ,,_., � . i , I ,�I"� 1�� I ,._ _ - _ - - - - �� _ � I � � �� ,�� ; � • - ':�. I �]� �'i:�: -v�. � C� � . • y � � ' i � ��'`Z`� ��" � ,i��• �� I � ��`; p ` I' �,� I I _ � � :�.• i . . . � I �J ' { t��' � I I +y �fi I .. ,. 4 � ��/ �� , � �~ i I � � � I � � � .t. , . . � �. �. _ � LJ f.�� « 'r'�� i I rr I �, . �.{ cl � • I'�• I i I I . . �-- - ''+ .•r a,� • '� ��' I � I . . i I I I. . �� .4� I � � �`I" I I /�� . I � � I I � . 1 , �'. . /� �.� .`�«'� `� � ♦ `4 I L/ I . . . l �, I I . I i r � �' ! . '�!;: ' `� .t r �� I I � � 1 I I ' ,�'.�,� `a�� , `�� ; , � :.•:�. . . .i� ' WHA-10 � � ' �. ; � ; � %'F '. � i i � �`. �,�' ,,� ��<<'``:�:;:��: � � ,��. :�:•.:. � ` _,��-�� {i�j •,= i I ' :r''*��.•4� '�'hi:: � , .�.::--' ,��: ` i -�. : :°a�F I I ! I � i, 1 _ '; +! � ••� ' � � � �. I l , � ; -`�__ � �'* ��-- � ��' : l l � l l � l. l l_ l --� �%�� : i � ,��ll; ri � � ��' , �,l} ,'�I 'il . ,, �, � . � � , � � � I i 1 � l i i I 1 � � l�l . � �'i �� 'j i�� l� � �' , � � �, i i �� . . . I � � �� ,�_ :�:° '��HA-li i I; I, I �. I.� �� I I � ., j I �! ��,�.'�,��.� � � '�i',I. ��, f� i" I i I�� ' I I I i, I l l�I �� p I� l'�� l�� . ��' a sc� �aa i wo � ,/ � � i I' � l I'. I�'� I'�. l'. �. l � I��: I_ �l � :;'��' � I � ' I . � / y .: I t i �� ; � � � � .�:;� ,�� WHA-12 �� T �, i ��, i '� -'' � I ,� �I ' � ° �� I � � j � i I I I I I /�.� � , r��---'� ., f � � �� ! i runa�u� rar etfa p3v�.et ae n�o+�ai.a e� ■ p.nt hon Iw ikyw TH19 1lAP G4 FiOR PfINH@IG P47RP{19SS OPif.Y . oe,�rtmmt ee wa cea.e+.aeu m 1laterehed Houndary 1f8T[1ND HOIINDdiiI6S AR8 APPROROfAT6 Project Bouadary/UG8/City Limita �ILD LIFE � �� g llildli}e Arca � Iniurmation ehowu on thie mep ie fer Planninr Pm'Poeee an�y and A R E A S *e��d iulnrmaUoa iA eubjact to chan�e. Tnere may be nomapped Bstusrins and Near Shara HabiRaL � i I �rellande euE]eat to ra=nlation aad all weflnnd Louudary mappio� is appaorimate. In all ouee, ectael fleld couditiome determine wetlend �etlflnd Outaide of lflldl5fe Arefl � bauadarlee. Yoa ere �dvleed to contact kha Divleiea ot Skate Imde and the U.S. Co e�( � eare wlth � ueetiane. DA1F. DECEMBEIP, 1003 Paclfic 9abikat Sarvicas,Inc. �� r� �7 wtlo mr Commno. c�.a.. aow teo BASE MAF /NF6.� C+ a a � [� �IL°°�1�. 9°p°o v7P� raw� ia0.t1 4'ro-aeaa � - � - ,,� �,�.. 285� Local Wetiands and Riparian Inventory !�� i �� I � .I -7 � _ � �� 1 � y � 1 U ( V � ]� � i Y. ..=� ........... �: 'TP � � 1 � ,�,�i-i-�,w. . � � ��.' . ... . . . . . . . . . . .' �� : . . . ' � ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . � . — - ..� , '�r, ...... . . . . .... . ... :I �.��. f•� : a'. :�: ; �•, ,'� r'. �.; f ............ .;.f.: h }. .. . . . ... . ♦'.� I .......... '��.: .'�.'. '.�� '� `•, ; 4•, ! � : �`. .'� I�VI � � �.r .�j. 1 V 7 y i. . ` � t4. ,:T '� h � $ ��' .: ��'�s��'i�/1�'C'.�Q1�1�'�'�`Q�V . • � f��;. ' �1�.•. .�;,: i � � •��•4.• � �1 �f"'� � . . � :4.� �; � :t'� I �,�� .� r � : �w . " f� l f�� ' ' 4 � � . !7 i •.�• .. . . '�: �/ � I7�`,�..� ^�� ......�(.� ....... !J I ' . �.�'r. i�. �� ..........�•....... ` i �•� 1 ,�� , , �1♦ Pirate .�: . . .;: � � .fi Cove �T �-� �" �'�� :�::;�: :,�: �� ,� � .�.� _ i +�+, � �'i . � � ��.� i� � � 1 � � / � r �1 �� y � I � �. i. � � I �` ` � I �l ll � • � 1 ' � �� . j. � r � �� ':.�Ri'�3'� �.......":.'.'.: :. .:'. :.....'.'..: .'.'.'. :'.'. :'..'.': .':: .': .': i.'.: :.':.'.' -'�'� '�� l . po�'��.�e��.��. .. . , � '�� , �I ................................................ �.......,.,�.}.��:•� � � - �'� .,:. � -�;�� i . . . :.,,.� �� , .. . � , � �� -��,: ............. ....... �� , . ............................................ ........ I�' : :i:. .:, f�� . . ..{:. •.s'�. �I. � � . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . �'�' ,r+s i' � .�.� ..............:�'.�� r .�. ��'`F`.; ..... ..f.�.i.' ��. �%�::,,r��, �;i``�.�.�.�.�:�.. ;;}�.;� ��'{;, �' r�.'.F.'�f� d ,� I j ' r _ _i �-,-, � -T i -,.�; �--1_�' ''_. � � . � Gf�� i � o �o �ao i.ao f�YH:1A��■�.��Y �� ta��.�,�,...�.��,.��.� Uep�rme¢t of 1anC � s�nA Derelopmsat liaterahed Baundarp Praject Boundary/UGB/Cikp Limite Fareeted Area Metland ! DAIE• DECEMBER, 2003 BRSE ,1lAP 1NF0.� Su�ia'ied bv Citv af Osuoa 8uv �� 0 � �..��f ,�.�,;.c�:� � , __ .:�?.:1':':::��"" � .{• : � .�., �-�— �—'��., F .: i='�.��:i:� �.+ LL � :'+�..'. . I ... I �I'�:.`�4.'.'.:!'.'.'.'.' � �,�,�'�': .'i'.' ,, �, ..': ,:C,'. � ; , � ,: � J I ' � � I � i .'i ��` i�f.;� �: ' `: � � – r''� ,I �.�� . �.. ••'.� .......•.� �;' �� :;�: ��:.......::�: ::�:.�.��a � ' �-- F � �� .. . . .. . . .. . . .. ... � � �l �� •i::•. �' ;; ,� i .,.� '�� - - � -- r,'TT��'� � ... ... .... .... . ..... �� , ,�.' _.- '.,�i� r �•� � ::�: '.f. ..;.r,:.�.'." .. � ..�:�:• .y.,':..� :...:.:::...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: z� ��, .�+..... � . . . � .. � .......... , �.� ....., '.� 1 ,,,_ : .. .... .�'.`� e .. ........................ . . .... � y . .: � . . . . . . . ..� ..........:\' . .................................'.� _� . �; .`.'I� � ; :`.' .`�: :. ,•w '.l'. � i .. •��•� •��•� '.� .. � . .. ... .. .. . , � F ' . , .. . ... . .. .,.'�'.' . . .. . ... . .. . . .. �i �.�•� • M - "��JN��,•:�• fi�l��?.1�.A��flI�I'•:�f�:�: ; •: � �t�i.:�epae:.�ay�:�r��:�� : ';�;:: • � : ��.�::.�.:•. .. . . . •:, : �.. :.;: :�; . ...... ..... .. ...��•.......... .................._ .. ... .. F�RESTED AREAS Depae Bay 'rHIS lfAP L4 FOR PL1NN�'IG PURYOS63 OHLY 1f6TLAND BOIRPDSRie9 � APPRO7�fATE AND 9UBfSCf TO CHAHG6 IoMrmation �hmrn vn tLia me.p i� far P�+�i P�'Pwee moly eud wetland lntornoation le su6Ject to chanQe. Thexe m�y be unmapped watJaAdR eu6]�et W ee`uletian end rll xetland baundary pqepplp` 1u appav�mate. ]n all ceeee, ectuel [Leld condttlonn determine wetlend 6auaderles. Yau are edvleed t,a contact the Mvision at 9tate Iende and J08 N0.• 2853 �ocar Wetlands and Riparian Inventory Aabltai 8arvlcee,Inc. e�. a�.. ad�. ,eo le� Or�rm G7070 �1 � H�� - i� � WHALE C4VE ��--�, �.L ,�� 0 � r � -� �i � � . � �'. � — — � � �: �;' ,i � ., ; �� r�; � °� `� � ; !a.�_ !.L;� _' I___�- — --�� - i � r `� ��`�.�. �� t � 1 �' �- J �; I� � ° � � � � _ � I � �� " '� '� J �� {'� � � � r r , �� .. � . . " � �- . j I � � ...;.� � � � a •....c...° 1 �` � w.�.. —r . � ,..�.. ��.`F t i ..:.'i' `,','�� .� :: '' ....�:.•,. :.: � De �ae i "�".�., i o- ; ., f 4 �: ..... � R p p l �� ,• �_ � � l� �� LLi� B�� ' �� /.�..�..�.�.�.�. {� � J � � � I � 1F I � � � �^� � � � �I � � � � � . '`� � ��-; ' � .� � `71 r;�=� �- � P ' �i � j h . .i ,�—,,,.� �� - i'rtr��" � . .............�. � i _ - °,�; , � J � � L��,.� I . I ; `� � � i � - ti .. ...._. �� ' � I : �!�'� � � I I ..... .. .. f 1_ � �;`.'. . . : : :f ,'.': : : .','.': . . . . . . .. . . .....'. . . i i � � �"'� I j .��1'..:..'.�J.�.'.�: � :':...., . � � :•' .�:.'.�.'.'.'.�.�:.'::.I.'..r.:. ... ' ti � � �i�� .�d '.� . �...�.i �� ' I � �� .., : *.:. : ,;,' ': .'fi .: i ,�� i� 1 �� . _ .��; :,��;*:. �I.� �" � �� 1 . .. ... ..... ................::� ; r � .... .. ..... .................. �' � ' h � � � ,4 �' . �:� J �Ly, ' �f„�I :'�: • . ..'i I ................... `�t t I ...... . ................................ , 1 . p ..., ... � � � I1�. �'i�e�.�y ..•..• ..............� `' .�\ . ' 1 � I ... �..... .......... � .................. � ! L�. ..... .�.....�...��.......� . ............ I _ � 1 � . . .. . . �� .. .......... � ......... � � .... . �i ' � . ��. � . � �� .�. ��..�.�� ..�� -..�.�.��.�.� �.�� .�.�.�.�.�.�.�,'� � .��T. '', .N I — ............�d...........�.......�.�.� ...�.......� � � � — �•��.'.'�'T{��.�:�.�.�.�{��•�'��, ;r I '.' I': ,', .': : : , :'.','. :': .'; : : , ;','.': : ;'`,': .': ,'.',','. � � ( � � �' • 1 aLtC�1'.�ep�t�e'.�3�y�re�•��D�);. '1•; , I I f _ ; —_ J� ...... .... ... :•��: .. .... , ..... ..... , . ... f . .. �:w �I � J ,�' j �' . . . . . . . .. : � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �: .'w � I � ' �Li 1� � .. . . . ' �'. . . ;:�., : � T � .. . . ":�.�.:.�:,',�.,' '�' . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .: �� . .. ......... ............ ..... : �'.:,: :•i::: :, � ... .. . .. . ............... ............. ,. ., .,... .,..... ..............:�...................... .......:. � . ,..,.�� :........ ............... ...................... ��: .... . f ... ., ;�``�,� ,•�.; :{. �:a• . :+�. .•��. . :.� { � r'; . � � ,, � '.�', ',1, '.f' ',f,' .'� .�. .�. •.i.• ., f � f� :t. . ... . .. . ....'.�' . .. . . '.t '. �' { .�.". r �'; '.� /! ',I.' '.�:1'.' '�' '.:i: � .'f: . j'. •'� fi .'P`.' .. `� f, :+'. .f. .'y.. ..1: �� .'�'. . '.1' . '��' .............. . :!4vi, .� �.•YlI.�.. :': ; , . , , : . .'. , ' ! ' : �', : w y � � � ��4,�e}V� • T �I�•� ��.� � � ' � —� '�' : i .�7C'. : �.';1': , y �r�"- '�':.'.�:�,. �'. { �.• � r•� � ,�, �� •�l ? I ' �: .L'.'.': ,'.':: : : . � . ..�.; ...... �'. .... � ..,....... . � .... .. .................... ' i ' ' _,.. . -.�_. . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. ....... , ---F .. .. ....,..... + ' If: . i h ..-- . ........... , . .. � ��..:- . . __ ....�... . ... . .. � �� i �. _ � �� , �� i � � o �bo �o �,� SCAI,L IPI FEBT U.u�,rtw:#� e�r �a � p �.v w,� lfaterahed Boundary - - -- Pxaject Boundary�VGH�City Limita Roreated Area �� RetEand � DA �f:' D£CfMB£R, 20tlJ BASE MAP lNFO: Su�a� JOB NO.: 1853 u�. w. F�RESTED AREAS Depo� Bay :' 'L'A15 WAP I$ FOR PLAPINING pURPOS$S 0lYIY lf�l'LAN� BOUNDARIBS ARE 6PPROXSMATB ANU 3UHJECT 1'0 CHANGE Infarnlaflan ahowa on Ehie msp ie far plennln� purpoeae on� md wet�end in[ormak[on ie eaLject to cheuge. Thore may be unmaPped xetSends suLject to retuleflon aad aR xetland boundary mappiny u epproiimete. In all caeee, actual fteld condltloae determtne rratlmd Loundarlee. You are adviaed to coateot the Divieion of State Lends and Local Wetlands and �iparian Inventory tic BaMiat 8erslcee.Ime. sr c�.�. �a., �da ieo o.u�. o,�� wror° � � n (noa} o�o-oeoo P.HS.II f � �� i � --', -_ _—_—�� _ _ �� I � � �,�s ��..�� ._ �� _�_ -- - _ _ _ �— i f , J —�,�' ~ � � � f ` � ��rN b % . f ! ' �,, I r /' I P f ✓ I �am( I�6d o0IliuCVO �M �1MnlapmR IM OrrEC Rnterahed Houndary - — Project Boundary/UGBfCiky LUaite Desi6nated Open Space � . Aefland � OA 1E.� OECEMBER, 2Ck73 BASE AIAP lNFp: SGAFlied bY Cit�r 0/ (MpoaBuY_ �PEI� SPACE Depoe Bay Tffi9 YAP IS FUR FIAI4HING PDRPOSS3 ONLY RCfiJND BOUNDARf69 ARB dPPRAROGITS ANQ 3Q87ELT TO CHANC6 Iniormal3ou ahvwa oo thie map ie tor plauniae purpoeee an�y end *etlend into:meflan Ie eubjeot W chante. Thare �y be unmapped waflauda enbJect to regutation wd �l] weUaud boundvT m`PP�f � appro�m�te. 1¢ W c�eea, �ctaal Rald sonditioaa detarmine weUmd bound�riae. Yau ve ndriead Eo oaakact the DMaton oi Slata tanda sad tha II.9. Arm Co af an wlth eto*T eeliam. PadSe Habitat 8ervicea,lnc. W30 6i Cawmaw Cral�� Soi4 l00 �� No.; z�, Lacal Wetlands and Riparian Inventory �.:� f �',�'{ ❑ ��. � �'` � n �� • . :,': I: :1: �: ... : :.: _ • ° ` :�': I, :� � �; . . u � Wetland Characterization Sheet Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: s Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hvdrolo�ic basin: Soil -- Mapped series: Hvdrolo�ic Source: 9/24/2003 OFF-SITE NS Wetland Code: � Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(es): T9S R11W Sec. 5 East of Highway 101, just south of UGB 1109 North Depoe Bay Creek Neskowin-Salander silt loam, 5-35% slopes Groundwater `�� NDB-1 1.97 PSS, PEM S/F Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Lonicera involucrata Bearberry Honeysuckle Carex obnupta Slough Sedge Salix hookeriana Hooker Willow Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Myrica cali ornica Pacific Wax-Myrtle Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce � Pinus contorta Shore Pine Comments: OFF-SITE assessment. Iso�ated wetland at the base of the hillside east of Highway 101 at the north end of Depoe Bay. Wetland is 40% scrub-shrub and 60% emergent. The area is currently undeveloped but is zoned retail commercial, with upslope areas to the east zoned residential but currently undeveloped and used for timber production. ,djacent upland species: Pseudotsuga menziesii, Gaultheria shallon, Rubus discolor, Tanacetum vulgare, 'estuca arundinacea COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFH = Lacustrine Fringe Headwater LFV = Lacusfine Fringe Valley DO = Depressional Outflow DCP = Depressiona] Closed Permanent S = Slope FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet P H� Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: Investigator(s): Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hydrologic basin: Soil -- Mapped series: Hvdrolo�ic Source: Wetland Code: 9I30i2003 Size (acres): 1, 2� Cowardin Class(es): JVS/CR HGM Class(es): T9S R11W Sec. 5 Along the eastern UGB, North Depoe Bay Creek 100, 105, Z00, 300, 301, 400, 403, 6200, 6900 North Depoe Bay Creek Fendall-Templeton silt loam, 35-60% slopes Surface Flow NDB-2 2.19 PFO RFT Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Alnus rubra Red A1der Lysichiton americanurn American Skunk-Cabbage Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce Oenanthe sarmentasa Water-Parsley Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar Carex sp. Sedge Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Polygonum lapathifolium Willow-Weed Athyrium filix- emina Subarctic Lady Fern Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Comments Locally Significant Wetland WETLAND OF SPECIAL INTEREST FOR PROTECTION. Located in the hills along the east side of the Urban Growth Boundary and extending beyond to the east along North Depoe Bay Creek, NDB-2 is a collection of wetlands adjacent to the creek channels. This wetland is heavily forested and is located in a timber conservation zone. Adjacent upland species: Tsuga heterophylla, Gaultheria shallon, Sambucus racemosa, Polystichzsm munitum COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palus for este d HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub f SS = palustrine scrub-shrub PEM = palustrine emergent rFF3 = Fstuarine Fringe Embayment EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine I..FI [= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater LF'V = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DO = Depressional Outflow DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent S = Slope 1�L= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palusri open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet l� �� Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: �� 9/24/2003 3,4,5,6 NS/FS Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(es NDB-3 1.23 PFO, PEM RFT Location -- Legal: T9S R12W Sec. 5 Other: Collins Road, at edge of drainageway Tax Lots: 900, 1000,1102, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 4000, 4100, 4800, 5600, 5800, 5900, 6000, 6100 Hvdrolo�ic basin: North Denoe Sav Creek Soil -- Mapped series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam, 35-60% slopes lo�ic Source: Groundwater Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Picea sitchensis Sitka 5pruce Polypodium scouleri Leathery Polypody Alnus rubYa Red Alder Athyrium filix femina Subarctic Lady Fern Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Dryopteris austriaca Mountain Woodfern Blechnum spicant Deer Fern Maianthemum dilatatum False Lily-Of-The-Valley Claytonia sibirica Western Springbeauty Tolmiea menziesii Youth-On-Age Oenanthe sarmentosa Water-Parsley Veronica americana American Speedwell Comments Locally Significant Wetland Wetland is associated with drainageway that borders residential development. The wetland is divided north from south by Collins Road but a culvert under the road provides an open hydrologic connection. To the south the drainageway is narrower, with steeper banks than to the north. Wetland is 95% forested and 5% emergent. jacent upland species: Tsuga heterophylla, Gaultheria shallon, Sambucus racemosa, Ilex aquifolium, Ribes , Vaccinium ovatum, Vaccinium paYVifolium, Polystichum munitum, Trillium ovatum COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment LFH`= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressional Outflow S = Slope E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet `�� ► Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: 9/24/2003 7, S 3VSiFS T9S R11W Sec. 8 Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): 1.60 PFO, PEM RFT FyE Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hvdrolo�ic basin: HGM Class(es): Depoe Bay Creek and unnamed tributary; east of Winchell Street 101, 942, 2000, 3000 South Depoe Bav Creek Soil -- Mapped series: Glenedon silty clay loam Source: Surface Flow Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Alnus Yubra Red Alder Agrostis tenuis Colonial Bentgrass Salix hookeriana Hooker Willow Lysichiton americanum American Skunk-Cabbage Blechnum spicant Deer Fern Comments Locally Significant Wetland WETLAND OF SPECIAL INTEREST FOR PROTECTION. 70% forested and 30% emergent wetlands associated with Depoe Bay Creek and unnamed tributary (wetlands restricted to channel). Zoned timber conservation and residential. Area remains undeveloped but portions of the watershed have been recently logged. 'Adjacent upland species: Pseusotsuga menziesii, Pteridium aquilinum, Hypochaeris radicata, GaultheYia shallon, Rubus ursinus COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM COAES: R1= River lmpounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment LFH "= Lacush-ine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressional Outflow S = Slope E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PE = palustrine emergen EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet P H� Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Date(s) of field work Data Sheet Numbers 9/30/2003 9,10 NS/CR Wetland Code: Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(esl: 1.90 PFO S/F s Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hvdrolo�ic basin: Soil -- Mapped series: Hvdrologic Source: T9S R11W Sec. 8 Southern tributaries of South Depoe Bay Creek; Shell Ln south to UGB 101, 200, 942 South Depoe Bay Creek Nestucca silt loam, 0-2% slopes Groundwater Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Alnus rubra Red Alder Tolmiea menziesii Youth-On-Age Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Lysichiton americanum American Skunk-Cabbage Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar Athyrium filix- emina Subarctic Lady Fern Maianthemum dilatatum False Lily-Of-The-Valley Comments: Locally Significant Wetland WETLAND OF SPECIAL INTEREST FOR PROTECTION. 100% forested wetlands associated with � southern channels of South Depoe Bay Creek. Zoned timber conservation and residential. Area is undeveloped ,but portions of the southernmost end have been logged in recent years. Adjacent upland species: Polystichum munitum, Sambucus racemosa, Tsuga heterophylla, Pseudotsuga menziesii, Rubus discolor COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub PEM = palush emergent EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFH Lacustrine Fringe Headwater LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DO = Depressional Outflow DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent S = Slope FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet PHS s Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: Date(s) af field work: Data Sheet Numbers: s 10/10 & 10/23/2003 13, 14,15 ME/SE/NS/CR Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(es Location -- Legal: T9S Rl l W Sec. 8 Other: South Point Street south to Singing Tree Street. Tax Lots: 128, 300, 4201, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800 Hvdrolo�ic basin: VVhale Cove Soil -- Mapped series: Nelscott loam, -12% slopes Hvdrolo�ic Source: Groundwater � 7.90 PSS, PFO, PEM DO, RFT Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Lonicera involucrata Bearberry Honeysuckle Carex obnupta Slough Sedge Picea sitchensis Sitka Sprnce Maianthemum dilatatum False Lily-Of-The-Valley Myrica californica Pacific Wax-Myrtle Lysichiton artzericanum American Skunk-Cabbage Ranunculus repens Creeping Butter-Cup Comments Locally Significant Wetland This mosaic wetland (40% wet/60% upland) includes areas adjacent to defined drainages south of South Point Street as well as depressional areas to the south, as far as Singing Tree Street in Little Whale Cove. Composed of 30% forested, 50% scrub shrub, and 20% emergent cover, this wetland is bordered on all sides by residential ' development, with Highway 101 to the east. i Adjacent upland species: Psudotsuga menziesii, Tsuga heterophylla, Polystichum munitum, Gaultheria shallon, Blechnum spicatat COWARDIN CODES: PF O = palustrine forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub EPB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment L,FH''= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressional Outflow S = Slope E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PEM = palustrine emergent [:FR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine I.,FV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW =p open wa ter RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpennanent Wetland Characterization Sheet Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: o� SE/ME Size (acres) Cowardin Class(es) HGM Class(esl: Location -- Legal: T9S R11W Sec. 8 Other: Northeast of Meadow Ln., northwest of Singing tree St. Tax Lots: 128, 300 basin: Whale Cove Soil -- Mapped series: Depae loam, 0-7% slopes Hvdrolo�ic Source: Groundwater PH� 0.3 (approximate) PSS, PEM, PFO S/F Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Alnus rubYa Red Alder Poa annua Annual Bluegrass Lonicera involucrata Bearberry Honeysuckle Ranunculus repens Creeping Butter-Cup Carex obnu ta Slough Sedge Athyrium filix- emina Subarctic Lady Fern Epilobium watsonii Watson's Willow-Herb Comments: . OFF-SITE assessment. This mosaic wetland (80% wetland / 20% upland) is located east of Walking Wood Street Inear the north end of the community of Little Whale Cove. It is hydrologically connected to WC-la and is �composed of 15% forested, 35% scrub shrub, and 50% emergent cover. This wetland is bordered by residential development to the west, north, and south but remains undeveloped to the east. Previous Delineation �Concurrence:WD #98-0538 acent upland species: Psudotsuga menziesii, Tsuga heterophylla, Polystichum munitum, GaultheYia shallon chtites minima, Sonchus asper, Rubus ursuinus, Senecio jacobaea, Sambucus racemosa, COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline 1012J03,10i16/03 OFF-SITE E2F0 = estuarine forested PSS = palusfine scrub-shrub EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment LFH = Lacustrine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressional Outflow S = Slope E25S = estuarine scrub shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: � Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hydrologic basin: Soil -- Mapped series: Hvdrolo�ic Source: 11/29/2003 OFF-SITE SE/ME/JVS Wetland Code: Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(es): T9S R11W Sec. 8 South of treament plant, south of South Point Street 90000 Whale Cove Depoe loam, 0-7% slopes Groundwater PH� WC-2 0.36 PSS S/F Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Carex obnupta Slough Sedge Salix hookeriana Hooker Willow Potentilla anserina Silverweed Alnus rubra Red Alder Holcus Zanatus Common Velvet Grass Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce Comments: OFF-STTE assessment. Primarily scrub shrub wetland located adjacent to drainage that parallels the south side of the City treatment plant. Drainage continues to the north and flows into WC-lA. The area remains undeveloped but is zoned residential. djacent upland species: Picea sitchensis, Pteridium aquilinum, Gaultheria shallon, Polystichum munitum, edera helix, Rubus par-v�orus, Rubus ursuinus COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palush forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PSS = palush scrub-shrub PEM = palusfine emergent EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFH = Lacustrine Fringe Headwater LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DO = Depressional Outflow DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent S = Slope FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet Carex Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: Date(s) of field work Data Sheet Numbers Investi�ator(s): 10/2/2003 16,17 ME/SE Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(es Location -- Legal: T9S R11W Section 7 DD; Section 8 CC Other: Sonth and east of Cardinal St., north of Edgewater Tax Lots: Section 7: 301, 304, 401, 402, 2800, 3800, 3900, 4000 Section 8: 102118,119 121,122, 9000 basin: Whale Cove Soil -- Mapped series: Nelscott loam, 3-12% slopes Source: Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES/SHRUBS Lonicera involucrata Bearberry Pinus contorta Shore Pine PH� WC-3 0.79 PSS, PEM DCNP VINES / HERBS yrium filix femina cisetum arvense lobium watsonii Dipsacus sylvestr Rumex crispus Juncus effusus Potentilla �acili lanceolata Subarctic Lady Fern Field Horsetail Watson's Willow-Herb Teasel Curly Dock Soft Rush Northwest Cinquefoil English Plantain White Clover Comments: Locally Significant Wetland Off-site assessment. 80% scrub shrub and 20% emergent wetland located on undeveloped parcels in a residential area south and east of Cardinal Street. A 12 inch concrete culvert on the west end of the wetland conveys water under Cardinal Street and adjacent development and onto the cliffs to the west. Adjacent upland species: Pinus contorta, Picea sitchensis, Plc�ntago lanceolata, lawn grasses, Hypochaeris radicata, Rubus discolor, Gaultheria shallon COWARDIN CODES: PPO = palustnne forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- llepressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested YSS = palustrine scrub-shrub LFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment L,FH`= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressional Outflow S = Slope E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PI:M = palustrine eme EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Pettnanent P1; Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palusirine open water ItFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: I �y� � J� WC-4 Date(s) of field work: 10/2/2003 Size (acres): 0.40 Data Sheet Numbers: 24, 25 Cowardin Class(es): PEM, PSS Investigator(s): JVS HGM Class(es): RFT Location -- Legal: T9S Rl l W Sec. 17 Other: North of Hidden Reach and Gull Station Streets in Little Whale Cove Taac Lots: 700, 800, 2400, 2500, 2600, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3201, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3700, 7600 �ic basin: Whale Cove Soil -- Mapped series: Depoe Ioam, 0-7% slopes Source: Surface Flow Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Lysichiton americanum American Skunk-Cabbage Alnus rubra Red Alder Carex obnupta Slough Sedge Thuja plicata Western red cedar Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Myrica gale Pacifc bayberry Athyrium alix femina Subarctic Lady Fern Blechnum spicant Deer fern Comments: Locally Significant Wetland 80% scrub shrub and 20% emergent wetland associated with the channel of an unnamed creek that flows west from areas east of Highway 101 and into the Pacific Ocean. The system is bordered by existing homes and other properties proposed for development in the community of Little Whale Cove. Adjacent upland species: Picea sitchensis, Pinus contorta, Tsuga heterophylla, Yaccinium ovatum, Polystichum munitum, Gaultheria shallon, Hedera helix, Ilex aquifolium, Rubus ursinus, Vaccinium parviflorum, Sambucus i racemosa COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palusri forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment LFH = Lacustrine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressiona] Outflow S = Slope E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characteriz�ation Sheet PH� Project Name: De Bay Local Wetlands Inventor Wetland Code: 9/16/2003 Size (acres): 32, 33 Cowardin Class(es): .TIVS/ME HGM Class(es): Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: Investi�ator(s): Location -- H Legal: Other: Tax Lots: �ic basin: T9S Rll� South of 800, 230 Whale C Bandon Groundw Soil -- Mapped series: Hvtlrologic Souxce: Dominant Wetland Vegetation WC-5 0.70 PEM, PSS, R, PFO S/F, RFT ' Sec. 17 :idden Reach and Cormorant Streets in Little Whale Cove 4600, 4700, 4800, 7500, 7600 e sandy loam, 3-12% slopes TREES/SHRUBS Alnus rubra Red Alder Lonicera involucrata Bearberry Hon Salix hookeriana Hooker Willow Picea sitchensis Sitka Soruce VINES / HERBS Oenanthe sarmentosa Water-Parsley Lysichiton arneYicanum American Skui Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Carex obnupta Agrostis exarata Maianthemum dilatatum False Lily-Of-The-V Rou�h Horsetail Comments Locally Significant Wetland Primarily scrub shrub and emergent wetlands associated with the channel of an unnamed creek at the south end � the community of Little Whale Cove. Due to steep banks adjacent to the creek most of this area remains undeveloped, though it is bordered by residential properties to the north. Partially previously delineated (DSL # WD 00-0422). Adjacent upland species: Picea sitchensis, Pinus contorta, ?'suga heterophylla, Tjaccinium ovatum, Polystichum munitum, Gaulthena shallon, Hedera helix COWARDIIY CODES: PFO = palustrine forested fIGM CODES: Rl = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = es PSS — pali F.FB = Est L,FI��= La� DO = Dep S = Slope ne forested L2SS = estuarine scrub shrub �e scrub-shrub PEM = palustrine emergent Fringe Embayment rFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine : Fringe Headwater LPV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley al Outflow DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FI = Clats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = p open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet � �� Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: 11/21/2003 OFF-SITE HA Wetland Code: Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(esl: WC-6A 0.36 PSS, PFO RFT s Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hvdrolo�ic basin: Soi1=- Mapped series: Hvdrolo�ic Source: T9S R11W Sec.18 Whale Cove; south of McDonald, west of Interstate 5 400 Whale Cove Nelscott loam,l2-50% slopes Surface water Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Alnus rubra Red Alder Lysichiton americanum American Skunk-Cabbage Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Blechnum spicant Deer Fern Gaultheria shallon Salal Comments: Locally Significant Wetland OFF-SITE assessment. Data based upon previous delineation by W&H Pacific (DSL# WD O1-0328). Wetlands associated with the bottomlands of an unnamed creek which flows into Whale Cove. Stands of salmonberry with pockets of skunk cabbage. This is a forested, undeveloped area just south of residential properties. Adjacent upland species: Tsuga heterophylla, Rubus spectabilis, Gaultheria shallon, Polystichum munitum, Maianthemum dilatatum COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFH"= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DO = Depressional Qutflow DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent S = Slope FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Plow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent � Wetland Characterization Sheet PH� Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Date(s) of field work: Data Sheet Numbers: 11/21/2003 OFF-SITE HA Wetland Code: Size (acres): Cowardin Class(es): HGM Class(es): WC-6B 0.54 PFO RFT, S s Location -- Legal: Other: Tax Lots: Hydrolo�ic basin: Soil -- Mapped series: Hydrologic Source: T9S R11W Sec. 18 South tip of Whale Cove; south of McDonald, west of Interstate 5 400 Whale Cove Nelscott loam, 12-50% slopes Surface water. Groundwater Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS Alnus rubra Red Alder Cardamine angulata Angled Bitter-Cress Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Oenanthe sarmentasa Water-Parsley Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce Athyrium filix femina Subarctic Lady Fern Gaultheritt shallon Salal Chrysosplenium glechomifol Western Golden-Saxifrage Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar Tolmiea menziesii Youth-On-Age Lysichiton americanum American Skunk-Cabbage Carex obnupta Slough Sedge Comments Locally Significant Wetland OFF-SITE assessment. Data based upon previous delineation by W&H Pacific (DSL# WD O1-0328). Wetlands associated with the perennial channel of Deadhorse Creek, which flows into Whale Cove. Adjacent slopes are �, steep and include seeps that flow into the wetland. This is a forested, undeveloped area that is zoned residential. ',Adjacent upland species: Picea sitchensis, Pinus contorta, Tsuga heterophylla, Rubus spectabilis, Sambucus �racemosa, Vaccinium ovatum, Gaultheria shallon, Trillium ovatum, Maianthemum dilatatum, COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrin foreste HGM CODES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFH'= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DO = Depressional Outflow DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent S = Slope FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent Wetland Characterization Sheet PH� Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland Code: Date(s) of field work: 10/10/2003 Size (acres): Data Sheet Numbers: WC-26-31 Cowardin Class(es): Investigator(s): ME/SE HGM Class(es): Location -- Legal: T9S R11W Sec.18 Other: West of Walking Wood Street at Scarp Street Tax Lots: 1900, 2900, 3000, 3100 Hvdrolo�ic basin: Whale Cove Soil -- Mapped series: Nelscott loam, 3-12% slopes Source: 0.27 PSS, PEM DCNP Dominant Wetland Vegetation TREES / SHRUBS VINES / HERBS LoniceYa involucrata Bearberry Honeysuckle Ca�ex obnupta Slough Sedge Picea sitchensis Sitka Spruce Equisetum arvense Field Horsetail Myrica californica Pacific Wax-Myrtle Athyrium filix femina Subarctic Lady Fern Rubus spectabilis Salmonberry Rumex crispus Curly Dock Salix hookeriana Hooker Willow Comments: Locally Significant Wetland Primarily scrub shrub wetland (60%) with small amounts of forested (10%) and emergent (30%) areas. Associated with two depressional, linear features that converge north of Scarp Street and flow into adjacent 'depression to the south. This is a residential area within the community of Little Whale Cove. Adjacent upland species: Pinus contorta, Rhododendron sp., Picea sitchensis, Hedera helix, Polystichum munitum, Gaultheria shallon COWARDIN CODES: PFO = palustrine forested HGM COAES: RI = River Impounding DA- Depressional Alkaline E2F0 = estuarine forested PSS = palustrine scrub-shrub EFB = Estuarine Fringe Embayment LFH'= Lacustrine Fringe Headwater DO = Depressional Outflaw S = Slope E2SS = estuarine scrub shrub PEM = palustrine emergent EFR = Estuarine Fringe Riverine LFV = Lacustrine Fringe Valley DCP = Depressional Closed Permanent FL= Flats E2EM = estuarine emergent POW = palustrine open water RFT = Riverine Flow Through DB = Depressional Bog DCNP = Depressional Nonpermanent r�� U �`;a 1 i ' �I n� • .: ,�, � ��£ . . .i ., � i� 1 .,_ . �, � 0 Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site NDB-2-1 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/23/2003 Investigators: CR/JVS Township: 9S Range: 11 W Section: 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns �r2te ;ia� � , et� „ ";� 4 ,�� ab , � ; �,' SOILS Mapped Series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Andic Humitropepts Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix Soil � Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size%ontrast Field Indicators Comments 0-3 duff 3-16 lOYR 4/6 SL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �1�Cr1��C� ��;. � � �p,.� � VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Picea sitchensis* FAC 80 Polystichum munitum* FACU 70 bies grandis FACU- 10 Ranunculus repens FACW 10 Chamaecyparis Zawsoniana FACU+ 10 Galium aparine FACU 15 Equisetum ai-vense FAC 5 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Yaccinium parvifolium * UPL 50 Vaccinium ovatum * UPL 30 Woody Vine Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 20 Rubus ursinus * FACU 100 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 17% C�teria�lV�e� �� Comments: D�f�e�'��tio�� :� . . �JPlai��'� ect: pplicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/23/2003 vestigators: CR/,�S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 5 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atvnical Situation? PHS s . Wetland Determination Data Form ROUtirie Orisite MethOd Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. le oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site NDB-2-2 No Primarv Indicators Inundated Sat. in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits HYDROLOGY of Surf. HZO to Free H20 to Saturation 18 0 Inches Inches Inches Yes Secondarv Indicators Ox. rhizospheres Yes H20-stained leaves Local Soil Survey FAC Neutral Test Other SOILS Mapped Series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Andic Humitropepts Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-12 lOYR 3/2 SL 7.SYR 5/6 common, medium, distinct SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay VEGETATION Tree Stratum ius rubra * Shrub Stratum nbucus racemosa * 30% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 50% ) Status % Cover FAC 100 Lysichiton americanum * OBL 30 Ranunculus repens* FACW 25 Oenanthe sarmentosa * OBL 25 Equisetum arvense* FAC 20 20% ) Status % Cover FACU 100 Woodv Vine Stratum ( 0% 1 I Status I% Cover *Percent of dominant s FAC, FACW, or OBL: 83 % � Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s . Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site NDB-3-3 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: �ys/F'S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Yes Ox. rhizospheres Sat, in Upper 12" Yes H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 1 Inches Water Marks Locai Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes � �er �Me�, �� °�� r.�•, �� SOILS Mapped Series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Andic Humitropepts Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-5 lOYR 2/2 Peat Mucky *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay � �,t�ria ��' � ��,. .. 'es ; � v�� :�;1.. ��; E. , S VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover lnus rubra* FAC 60 Athyrium filix femina* FAC 90 Picea sitchensis * FAC 40 LysichiZon americanum OBL 10 Shrub 5tratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Rubus spectabilis* FAC+ 80 yaccinium parvifolium UPL 30 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Ribes divaricatum FAC 10 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 80% ��rx�'ria�N�t ��a; ��e��,;� .� Comments: ;;'D�e� �:. ��io � �. . ; 4� ` eMtlari� Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sam le Site NDB-3-4 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: ,�S/F'S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >18 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >18 Inclies Sediment Deposits Other Draina e atterns "�rit , `�ta� � � � ��' g P �.. �� . '�� ,�� <.=r��a SOILS Mapped Series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Andic Humitropepts Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix 5oi1 Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size%ontrast Field Indicators Comments 0-18 2.SYR 3/3 L *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Ctay Loam, S=Silt, SL=Sitt Loam, SCL=Siity C1ay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, G �ritQria�1'Ie� � � ,=a, �, ?��' VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous 5tratum ( 20% ) Status °/a Cover lnus rubra * FAC 30 Athyrium filix femina * FAC 80 Thuja plicata * FAC 30 Polystichum munitum * FACU 20 Tsuga heterophylla * FACU- 40 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Sambucus racemosa * FACU 30 Gaultheria shallon * FACU 40 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Rubus spectabilis * FAC+ 30 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 50% �' �'�� '�� '��` ��f.. �xa��I`�t.�� .:� �,..,�� Comments: '�� 111�8��t0�1� �-�> �� ' ,� - � =� „��.... � �,�>` Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS � Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site NDB-3-5 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: JVS/FS Township: 9S Range: I1W Section: 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Yes Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" Yes H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 1 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Draina e atterns Yes � lteri ,� et ��' �'k� "' g P e-- ��.��.: �; SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Textnre* Color abundance/size%ontrast Field Indicators Comments 0-7 lOYR 2/2 SD Mucky 7-14 lOYR 3/1 L 7.SYR 3/3 few/coarse/distinct Gravelly *SD=Sand, SDL=Sanay Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty C1ay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay � r�iEe�r�a Y .et �� f��'s . � VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (100% ) Status % Cover Scirpus microcarpus * OBL 30 Sparganium emersum * OBL 30 Oenanthe sarmentosa * OBL 20 Ranunculus repens FACW 10 Epilobium watsonii FACW- 5 Veronica americana OBL 5 Shrub Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 100% :C�art�e� ` e� �� a,� ......� �.e. `:. Comments: � �� ¢ � �� 3 � `� � e �� t;;..y � . ��, tIa��.:, Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site NDB-3-6 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: �S/F'S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 5 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Tnches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other � � �� Drainage patterns � �i � �t , � ° ` ��To�� .. , .�_. � � . �., SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric 5oi1 (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size%ontrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 SYR 3/2 L *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay ,� a " '� � w� , ��t r e,t� �, �� ^�, Na�. �x VEGETATION Tree Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover lnus rubra * FAC 100 Ranunculus repens * FACW 30 Polystichum munitum * FACU 30 Epilobium watsonii * FACW- 20 Maianthemum dilatatum * FAC 20 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover ° Sambucus racemosa * FACU 30 Rubus parviflorus* FAC- 40 Woody Vine Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover Rubus ursinus * FACU 100 �` p s s � � �� *�� ,� <��.., < .,,.�. � � . Percent of dominant s ecies FAC FACW or OBL: 50 /o G� �1� �� Comments: �� „<��?t��,�Y��'��:a�, 4 � .as��?�?�a�: Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site SDB-1-7 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: ,)ys/F'S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exzst on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >10 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >10 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns ��r'� et F ^� ; �o � � SOILS Mapped Series: Glenedon silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Aquic Humitropepts Drainage Class: somewhat oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-4 lOYR 3/2 SL 4-10 lOYR 3/2 SCL mixed w/lOYR 4/4 > 10 lOYR 2/2 CL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay ��2�, �I'1�,��, � �O ,,.��' VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Agrostis tenuis * FAC 30 Pteridium aquilinum * FACU 20 Blechnum spicant* FAC+ 25 Hypochaeris radicata * FACU 20 Shrub Stratum ( 50% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 60 lnus rubra* FAC 20 Woody Vine Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Salix hookeriana * FACW- 20 Rubus ursinus * FACU 100 *Percent of dominant s ecies FAC, FACW or OBL: 50% `�,(��it �a� � et ��, ,'�?�`�� l�T"o � w� P � �� ! � �� :� � ,�� _� Comments: ,�@ t� lI�� tl�yl:� ��p�a�i��F Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site $DB-� -8 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: JVS/FS Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox, rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" Yes A20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 5 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Draina e atterns ' � � � � ��' `�`� g P ;�r�fearia� iet..,�...�� es�". SOILS Mapped Series: Glenedon silty clay loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Aquic Humitropepts Drainage Class: somewhat oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-8 lOYR 2.5/2 silty muck SYR 4/6 few/coarse/distinct 8-14 2.SYR 3/2 silty muck *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay ��t�ia� �eYt ,: ,,_ ^� � "�es�'�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (100% ) Status % Cover Lysichiton americanum * OBL 100 Shrub Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant s ecies FAC FACW or OBL: 100% i�.�ria l��„ '� '�� ' es� �y � P > > �E.� � � , �.. Comments: �ef��i�i w..,�i4� ��..��. ,.�+��tan'�� Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s . Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site SDB-Z-9 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/30/2003 Investigators: JVS/CSR Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators SecondarY Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes 'Crite�a N�et :� � �� Yes �� SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: maderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) COIOt Texture* Color abundancelsize/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2/1 SL "SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �T1tC�la��C�� ,�"� � �rW-3�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover lnus rubra * FAC 100 Tolmiea menziesii * FAC 60 Lysichiton americanum * OBL 40 Shrub Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover ubus spectabilis* FAC+ 70 Sambucus racemosa* FACU 30 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 80% ;C�iteri�a�J�eE �� _�, Yes '�: Comments: � ,� � ,� ,-�� lJ��'�rmi o ��, � , �Wetla 1� PHS s Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. •oject: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site SDB-2-10 pplicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/30/2003 vestigators: JVS/CSR Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres 5at, in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves �pth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey �pth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test �pth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Classification: Typic Haplorthods � Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations (Inches) COIOI' Texture* Color abundance/sizelcontrast 0-2 Duff 2-8 lOYR 3/3 CL 8-16 lOYR 5/3 SL Hydric Soil?: �ainage Class: moc Other Hydric Soil Field Indicators No � well drained Comments SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loain, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay VEGETATION Tree Stratum Thuja plicata * Shrub Stratum hus spectabilis * nbucus racemosa * *Percent of dominant s 50% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (15% ) Status °/a Cover FAC 100 Polystichum munitum * FACU 50 Athyrium filix femina * FAC 25 Maianthemum dilatatum * FAC 20 35% ) Status % Cover FAC+ 70 FACU 30 FAC, FACW, or OBL: Woodv Vine Stratum ( 0% 1 I Status I% Cover 67% A Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method (i ' Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-PW-11 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/23/2003 Investigators: CR/�S Township: 95 Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 18 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other � c � � �: �; �.� a x Drainage patterns Yes `� i erYa e �e��:. � �n:�,� ��. SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundancelsize/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2/1 S *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay .,�� . �e� �`��s �� ' e � � �' � ��£ �� e � VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Picea sitchensis * FAC SO Lysichiton americanum * OBL 55 Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU 10 Athyrium filix femina * FAC 20 lnus rubra FAC 10 Carex obnupta OBL 15 Polystichum munitum FACU 10 Shrub Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover Rubus spectabilis * FAC+ 80 lex aquifolium UPL 10 Woody Vine Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon FACU 10 Hedera helix* UPL 100 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 80% � �t�� ; „� 'N�e�� . :�`�.�`� �„ `�;�,� Comments: ��t�� ti��e :�e�lan`�� Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-PW-12 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoin Date: 10/23/2003 Investigators: CR/J`VS Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox, rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other � � � ; Drainage patterns ��teria��et�, �,� � o �a„� SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-2 duff 2-16 lOYR 2/2 SL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay � � �' ��0 G�it ia �'�e�� . � VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Pseudotsuga menziesii * FACU 50 Polystichum munitum * FACU 50 Tsuga heterophylla* FACU- 50 Blechnum spicant* FAC+ 30 Maianthemum dilatatum * FAC 20 Shrub Straturn ( 35% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 80 Rubus spectabilis* FAC+ 20 Woody Vine Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover Hedera helix* UPL 100 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OSL: 38% �,�, y �� ' �� 1�� VS��, �� . �.. "� Comments: �,�� ,�ri�tx�`�� Pla�;� Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-1A-13 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes C1��tte�i� e,�� ,�� e �� '' . �..�. e � SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 3/1 SCL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay ,,� �� i ei�ia�M,�et� .� , `a��,�� .�eS .,. � VEGETATION Tree Stratum (15% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 65% ) Status % Cover lnus rubra * FAC 100 Poa annua * FAC 35 Ranunculus repens* FACW 32 Carex obnupta * OBL 20 Athyrium filix femina FAC 5 Epilobium watsonii FACW- 5 Senecio jacobaea FACU 3 Shrub Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 90 Sambucus racemosa FACU 10 Woody Vine Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Rubus ursinus* FACU 100 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 83% F�� it��xa�Met� ��' ��«� �Yes„�� Comments: � � I)�e� mi��Y+u �� `...�.. ��°: � .t�cl,�: Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method 1 kl�� Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-1A-14 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/16/2003 Investigators: �ys/�'S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" Yes H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 12 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes '��te i� et �` � �° `'��` � ° � <�:, . u�.., �� 3e � - SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2/1 L 16-20 2.SYR 4/2 SCL lOYR 5/6 common, medium, distinct *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay (�ri ri�Nlet� �� . �e�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 85% ) Status % Cover Carex obnupta * OBL 90 Erechtites minima UPL 3 Sonchus aspeY FAC- 2 Shrub Stratum (15% ) Status °/a Cover Ribes acerifolium * NI 100 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0°/a ) 5tatus % Cover ��'it��ia� M`e�� z��,�� .a.' � �s � ': : *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 100% _, ,� �� ' �� Comments: ��e�mt� � ro � � ��. � ;.� �I�u�� ect: PHS s . Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-1 A-15 of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/16/2003 TVS/FS Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atvnical Situation? No HYDROLOGY of Surf. H20 to Free H20 to Saturation Inches >15 Inches >15 Inches Primary Indicators Inundated Sat. in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Secondarv Indicators Ox. rhizospheres H20-stained leaves Local Soil Survey FAC Neutral Test Other SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* COIOI' abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators 0-5 lOYR 3/3 SL 5-15 lOYR 3/2 SL Yes y drained Comments )=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �it��'a et:�� 3 ��,� o� �"` ;� , � � � �� ,� �, �.� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover °ea sitchensis * FAC 100 Carex obnupta * OBL 60 Dactylis glomerata* FACU 40 Shrub Stratum Gaultheria shallon * Ilex aquifolium * of dominant 10% ) Status % Cover FACU 70 UPL 30 FAC. FACW, or OBL: Woody Vine Stratum Hedera helix* 33 % 60% ) � Status �% Cover UPL 100 � ect: PHS � Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. )epoe Bay LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-3-16 �plicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 vestigators: SE/ME � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? this an Atvpical Situation? HYDROLOGY of Surf. H20 to Free I320 to Saturation Inches >14 Inches >14 Inches Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No No Primarv Indicators Inundated Sat. in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits SecondarY Indicators Ox. rhizospheres H20-stained leaves Local Soil Survey FAC Neutral Test Other SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: poorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-14 lOYR 3/3 SDL kSD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay VEGETATION Tree Stratum zus contorta * °ea sitchensis * Shrub Stratum Gaultheria shallon * 60% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover FAC 50 Ca�ex obnupta * OBL 40 FAC 50 Polystichu�n munitum* FACU 30 Rubus ursinus * FACU 20 Trifolium pratense FACU 10 30% ) � Status �% Cover FACU 100 Wood_y Vine Stratum ( 0% ) I Status I% Cover '`Percent of dominant s FAC, FACW. or OBL: 50% � ect: �plicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 vestigators: SE/ME � Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atvpical Situation? PHS � Wetland Determination Data Form Routin Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. )epoe Bay LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-3-17 No Primarv Indicators Inundated Sat. in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits HYDROLOGY of Surf. H20 to Free H20 to Saturation 9 5 Inches Inches Inches Yes Secondary Indicators Ox. rhizospheres H20-stained leaves Local Soil Survey FAC Neutral Test Other SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentration's Other Hydric Soil (Inches) COIOP Texture* COIOP abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators 0-14 2.SY 2.5/1 Muck Yes v drained Comments SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay VEGETATION Tree Stratum zus contorta * Shrub Stratum ziceYa involucrata* ultheria shallon * �rica gale bus spectabilis `Percent of dominant 10% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum FAC 100 Carex obnupta * Maianthemum dilatatum * Juncus tenuis Lysichiton americanum Ranunculus repens 45% ) Status % Cover FAC+ 55 FACU 30 OBL 10 FAC+ 5 FAC, FACW, or OBL: 40% ) Status % Cover OBL 50 FAC 25 FACW- 15 OBL 5 FACW 5 Woodv Vine Stratum ( 0% ) I Status I% Cover 80 % �omments: Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-PW-17 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 Investigators: SE/1VIE Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 9 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 5 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes � � �i �eria�� `� � ,..�� e��„�„ � SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-14 2.SY 2.5/1 Muck *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay 7� y, I�e,.�1��R,..S � 3 3 � Qr��,;; � . ��,,, � z ��, �. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Pinus contorta * FAC 100 Carex obnupta * OBL 50 Maianthemum dilatatum * FAC 25 .Iuncus tenuis FACW- 15 Lysichiton americanum OBL 5 Ranunculus repens FACW 5 Shrub Stratum ( 45% ) Status % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 55 Gaultheria shallon * FACU 30 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover yrica gale OBL 10 Rubus spectabilis FAC+ 5 *Percent of dominant s ecies FAC FACW or OBL: 80% ° �' `" '�� ,, � es��'� P > > �G� te��'a �et1 . �� _ ,�� .� . Comments: �yet�ti'n��.. ��a ::. ��a,�ti� Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s . Pacifc Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-PW-18 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 Do Norma] Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >12 Inches Sediment Deposits Other �� , . ,Drainage patterns Yes Criteria 1V��t` ': Yes � SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam I3ydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-12 lOYR 2/1 L *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay Criter a�Met� � � ��=,Ye�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 90% ) Status % Cover Carex obnupta * OBL 60 Potentilla gracilis * FAC 20 Juncus tenuis FACW- 10 Equisetum arvense FAC 7 Epilobium watsonii FACW- 3 Shrub Stratum ( 5% ) Status % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 100 Woody Vine Stratum ( 5% ) Status % Cover Rubus discolor* FACU 100 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 75% 'Criteria:Met �.��,. ,: � Yes �� 'Comments: � �, a� ,�� .. �C�,ti�r�lll��l��i� �� P,�tl�l�i° PHS s Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. �oject: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-PW-19 pplicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 vestigatars: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 8 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atvaical Situation? No HYDROLOGY Inches >18 Inches >18 Inches Primary Indicators Inundated Sat. in Upper 12" Water Marks Drift Lines Sediment Deposits Secondary Indicators Ox. rhizospheres H20-stained leaves Local Soil Survey FAC Neutral Test Other of Surf. H20 to Free H20 to Saturation SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderatel well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abandance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-18 7.SY 2.5/1 SCL e SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL-SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, VEGETATION Tree Stratum 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum Epilobium angustifolium * Carex leporina * Equisetum arvense Tellima grandiflora Senecio jacobaea Epilobium watsonii 5% ) Status % Cover Polystichum munitum FAG 100 90% ) Status % Cover FACU+ 33 FACW 25 FAC 15 UPL 15 FACU 5 FACW- 5 FACU 2 Shrub Stratum 5us parviflorus * Woody Vine Stratum Rubus ursinus * Rubus discolor* of dominant FAC, FACW, or OBL: 20% 5% ) Status % Cover FACU 50 FACU 50 omments: Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-PW-20 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/16/2003 Investigators: JVS/FS Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >15 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >15 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns �� r � � \ '. � �xte�ta _, et �< � ..�� a �. SOILS Mapped Series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Andic Humitropepts Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-2 Duff 2-15 lOYR 2/2 SL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L-Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �� Q.,�� ,�.; . � �� '`,�` `,_ �K�. A �o. VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover Picea sitchensis * FAC 100 Polystichum munitum * FACU 100 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Rubus spectabilis * FAC+ 100 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 67% ��iterY�l�e�.�' �� .. '.:; es ,_,. �.: �Comments: � ��e� � a�ian �� Plan�.;,,.. Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site �IVC-PV1l-2� Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/16/2003 Investigators: ,NS/F'S Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primary Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Yes Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" Yes H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 1.5 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 0 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes Crxteria Met:�w '" Yes �� SOILS Mapped Series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Andic Humitropepts Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2/2 Peaty Muck Few sand grains •SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=Clay Loam, C=Clay � ��riter�� et� �.��.` r��''��Y s�`��,` �� .;��.�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum (15% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 50% ) Status % Cover Inus rubra * FAC 100 Athyrium filix femina * FAC 30 Chrysosplenium glechomifolium * OBL 30 Equisetum arvense FAC 15 Polystichum munitum FACU 15 Erechtites minima UPL 5 Epilobium watsonii FACW- 3 Shrub Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Blechnum spicant FAC+ 2 ubus spectabilis* FAC+ 60 Gaultheria shallon * FACU 40 Woody Vine Stratum ( 10% ) Status % Cover Hedera helix* UPL 100 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 67% :Criteria��e�t ��>�� Yes �� Comments: Dete��ina�i ,+t►�' ��,<�,��Wetl��c�,� Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method I `i �� J� PaciSc Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site 'WC-PW-22 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay Gounty: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Yes Sat. in Upper 12" Yes H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes `�nteria�M r �,�, � � es� : G � SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-2 Duff 2-16 7.SY 2.5/1 �C H odor *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay .� �� :, � , �� k, '� �er�a N.�et es . -..: m. �.,�. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (15% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Tsuga heterophylla * FACU- 100 Carex obnupta * � OBL 75 Pteridium aquilinum FACU 15 Lysichiton americanum OBL 10 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Rubus spectabilis* FAC+ 75 hamnus purshiana FAC- 15 Woody Vine Stratum ( 5% ) Status % Cover Lonicera involucrata FAC+ 5 Hedera helix 100 UPL Rubus parviflorus FAC- 5 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 67% C�r�`e ;`,� +�� ,�„ � � .,�=; Comments: Hedera helix discounted as a dominant due to its low percentage of total cover and the fact that the vines were predominantly rooted outside of the wetland boundary. ��et�rm� w �onx�„� ; �� ,.��an,d�t Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacifc Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-P�I-23 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth af Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >15 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >15 Inches Sediment Deposits Other � �� :. �� Drainage patterns Critersa Met: �: ` �° No ;� SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matri�e Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-10 Duff 10-15 lOYR 2.5/1 SL *SD=5and, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, G Criteria�� 'es�'"�: VEGETATION Tree Stratum (15% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 3% ) Status % Cover Tsuga heterophylla * FACU- 100 Pteridium aquilinum * FACU 100 Shrub Stratum ( 70% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 75 Yaccinium ovatum* UPL 25 Woody Vine Stratum (12% ) Status % Cover Hedera helix* UPL 50 Rubus ursinus * FACU 50 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 0% Criteria�M�,�# ��`� ,�; „� �;x �to �� Comments: Dete`�� .?�� .`� �� ` .iTpla�cl�' ,,... � _. . Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI . Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-4-24 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox, rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes Criteria 1VIe�. �� =�� Yes . SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Aydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorly drained Depth Matrix Soil Redog Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/conlrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2/1 Sandy Muck H odor *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=CIay �;. t��'X� � �� ,�� . . �"��,., �..� . � a ;w.. VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 0% ) Status °/a Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 65% ) Status % Cover Lysichiton americanum * OBL 70 Carex obnupta* OSL 25 Equisetum arvense FAC 5 Shrub Stratum (10% ) Status % Cover Rubus spectabilis* FAC+ 100 Woody Vine Stratum (10°/a ) Status % Cover Hedera helix* UPL 100 *Percent of domiriant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 75% Cri�eria��et ��`�,�� Y�es A�� Comments: ��'tc : � io�.��.' . �,. : etlaa,n��E Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s . Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-4-25 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primary Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >12 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns ` x�teria�7�!Ie� �,�� No �>�, �:aN. SOILS Mapped Series: Depoe loam Hydric Soil?: Yes Classification: Typic Duraquods Drainage Class: oorl drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-12 lOYR 2/2 SDL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=Silty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �,�t�er� e� ��% � .,. �Yo��' VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 50% ) Status °/a Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Tsuga heterophylla * FACU- 100 Shrub Stratum ( 45% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 65 Yaccinium ovatum* UPL 25 Woody Vine Stratum ( 5% ) 5tatus % Cover Rubus spectabilis FAC+ 5 Hedera helix* UPL 50 lex aquifolium UPL 5 Rubus ursanus * FACU 50 *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 0% � � g�`� �" C��te l��na . ��e� ,�., �� No � Comments: �e��,�.. � n�at�. �� , ��, �r,�� ,,,... Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-7-26 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 18 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >12 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes �Criteria�l�'Iet . ��°'� Yes '��°� � SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderatel well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-14 2.SY 2.5/1 SCL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, G �� ,� �- � C��terta� et �3 �� Y'es�� s , VEGETATION Tree Stratum (15% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Picea sitchensis * FAC 100 Carex obnupta * OBL 100 Shrub Stratum ( 45% ) Status % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 100 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FAGW, or OBL: 100°/fl Criteria Met �... ,.� ,�,, �`�� '� � Comments: ��fe �rt"�at�a�� :�� Wetlai�cl� PHS s Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. ect: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-7-27 licant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/10/2003 vestigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 18 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inandated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves �pth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey spth to Free H20 >12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test spth to Saturation >12 Inches Sediment Deposits Other SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* COIOT abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-15 lOYR 2/1 SDL SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, VEGETATION Tree Stratum :ea sitchensis* Shrub Stratum Gaultheria shallon * Vaccinium ovatum * Lonicera involucrata Myrica californica *Percent of dominant s 10% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum FAC 100 Carex obnupta * Polvstichum munitum 75% � Status % Cover FACU 35 UPL 35 FAC+ 15 FACW 5 FAC+ 10 �, FACW, or OBL: Woody Vine Stratum Rubus ursinus * Hedera helix* 33 % Loam, 10% ) Status % Cover OBL 90 FACU 10 5% ) Status % Cover FACU 65 UPL 35 omments: Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-7-28 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: ` 11W Section: 18 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primary Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >12 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >12 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns Yes ��,te,�t � � �t� �� e� , ;�' SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderatel well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast F1Cld IridlCatOPS Comments 0-4 lOYR 2/1 SL Mixed organics 4-15 lOYR 3/1 SCL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty C1ay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, G �� 1��1� � C ,�; � �C�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 40% ) Status °/a Cover Picea sitchensis * FAC 100 Carex obnupta * OBL 45 Lysichiton americanum * OBL 30 Oenanthe sarmentosa * OBL 25 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 50 onicera involucrata * FAC+ 50 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) 5tatns % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 83% C�Y,� ,,,�,�Met_� �� '� „�,�Ye ,�;�=; Comments: �`�� 1 , d,�1q1I� .r�� , � � ��illl(l�' ect: PHS s Wetland Determination Data Form ROII�Irie OriSlte Met�IOC� Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. le oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-7-29 pplicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 vestigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 18 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves �pth of Surf. HZO Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey �pth to Free H20 >14 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test �pth to Saturation . >14 Inches Sediment Deposits Other SOILS Depth (Inches 0-7 7-14 Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Classification: Typic Haplorthods � Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations COIOP Texture* COIOl' abundance/size/contrast lOYR 2/2 Duff/peat lOYR 2/1 SCL Hydric Soil?: �ainage Class: moc Other Hydric Soil Field Indicators No y well drained Comments s�ed organics )=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=Silty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �1'lt�i�'1`�dy � � ��, ; �:� $ �� `� ;�e�,�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 25% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover :ea sitchensis* FAC 100 Maianthemum dilatatum* FAC 50 Equisetum arvense* FAC 50 Shrub Stratum Gaultheria shallon * 70% ) Status % Cover FACU 100 Woodv Vine Stratum ( 0% ) I Status I% Cover *Percent of dominant s FAC, FACW, or OBL: 75 % A Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-7-30 Applicant: C�ty of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 Investigators: SE/ME Township: 9S Range: I1W Section: 18 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondary Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other Drainage patterns � � � l� SOILS Mapped Series: Nelscott loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: moderately well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2/2 SDL *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay ;� �r� x t F � . :-� ��% VEGETATION Tree Stratum (15% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 30% ) Status % Cover lnus rubra * FAC 100 Carex obnupta * OBL 50 Polystichum munitum * FACU 35 Pteridium aquilinum FACU 10 Equisetum arvense FAC 5 Shrub Stratum ( 55% ) Status % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 50 Rubus par FAC- 20 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover Gaultheria shallon * FACU 20 Sambucus racemosa FACU 10 � *Percent of dominant s ecies FAC FACW or OBL: 50% �;ra�Me� �� `` P > > � �<,�. ,�.s�� , a�, Comments: �� j �" l��d.li{�� PHS � Wetland Determination Data Form ROUtirle Ori5ite MethOd Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sannple Site WC-7-31 of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 10/2/2003 �E/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 18 � Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Sat, in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves �pth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey �pth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test �pth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other SOILS Mapped 5eries: Nelscott loam Classification: Typic Haplorthods T Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations (Inches) COlOr Texture* COI01' abundance/size/contrast 0-16 7.SY 2.5/1 SCL Yes ��r�t� �a' Hydric Soil?: �ainage Class: moc Other Hydric Soil Field Indicators H,S odor SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, VEGETATION Tree Stratum 0% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum Carex obnupta * Lvsichiton americanum No y well drained Comments Loam, 3% ) Status % Cover OBL 85 OBL 15 Shrub Stratum ( 35% ) Status % Cover Lonicera involucrata * FAC+ 70 Rubus spectabilis * FAC+ 2p Gaultheria shallon FACU 10 *Percent of dominant snecies FAC, FACW, or OBL: Woodv Vine Stratum ( 0% ) 1 5tatus I% 100% � Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-5-32 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/16/2003 Investigators: ,IVS/ME Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres 5at. in Upper 12" H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 >16 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation >16 Inches Sediment Deposits Other � Drainage patterns rx +et�t� � �. � � SOILS Mapped Series: Bandon fine sandy loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix Soil Redox Concentrations Other Hydric Soil (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-2 Duff 2-18 l 0YR 2/2 L *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �� .� �°°� �' �� z� :! VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 20% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover Picea sitchensis * FAC 100 Maianthemum dilatatum * FAC 20 Polystichum munitum * FACU 60 Equisetum hyemale* FACW 20 Shrub Stratum ( 40% ) Status % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 60 Gaultheria shallon * FACU 40 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 67°/a b�tr�rr�ta�e�� ,�?� �, �e�� Comments: " ��_...��,g �� ' � < .;,�iE��* Wetland Determination Data Form Routine Onsite Method PHS s . Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Project: De oe Ba LWI Number: 2853 Sample Site WC-5-33 Applicant: City of Depoe Bay County: Lincoln Date: 9/16/2003 Investigators: ,Tys/IyIE Township: 9S Range: 11W Section: 17 Do Normal Circumstances exist on this site? Yes Is the area a potential Problem Area? No Is this an Atypical Situation? No Primarv Indicators Secondarv Indicators HYDROLOGY Inundated Ox. rhizospheres Yes Sat. in Upper 12" Yes H20-stained leaves Depth of Surf. H20 Inches Water Marks Local Soil Survey Depth to Free H20 6 Inches Drift Lines FAC Neutral Test Depth to Saturation 0 Inches Sediment Deposits Other �� .,- �� , ,� �, Drainage patterns �r�teri� „ r � ^ � °" � es , �,' �.. .. SOILS Mapped Series: Bandon fine sandy loam Hydric Soil?: No Classification: Typic Haplorthods Drainage Class: well drained Depth Matrix 5oi1 Redox Concentrations Other Hydric 5oi1 (Inches) Color Texture* Color abundance/size/contrast Field Indicators Comments 0-16 lOYR 2.5/1 Peat H odor *SD=Sand, SDL=Sandy Loam, L=Loam, SDCL=Sandy Clay Loam, S=Silt, SL=SiIt Loam, SCL=SiIty Clay Loam, CL=CIay Loam, C=Clay �Y��x�� - �..,� , ��,�� VEGETATION Tree Stratum ( 3% ) Status % Cover Herbaceous Stratum ( 52% ) Status % Cover lnus rubra * FAC 100 Oenanthe sarmentosa * OBL 80 Lysichiton americanum OBL 10 Equisetum arvense FAC 5 Carex obnupta OBL 3 Agrostis exarata FACW 2 Shrub Stratum ( 45% ) Statns % Cover onicera involucrata * FAC+ 70 Salix hookeriana * FACW- 30 Woody Vine Stratum ( 0% ) Status % Cover *Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, or OBL: 100% ��rrit�„�a� e` ;�_:. �. �� pT �e,. 4 k`' Comments: � i�T��•�� : .�:"��`��: � �. �� .�. • I t ;1�: � � . _ 9 � . �_ � ._ ,: ,� �:�. �a a , ;� . . u � � Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) � Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife ' Fish Water " Hydrologic Sensitivity Habitat Habitat QualiTy Control to Impact Q A Q `A Q A Q: A' Q A Q-1 A Q-1 Q-1 C Q-1 B Q-1 A Q-2 C Q-2 Q-2 C Q-2 C Q-2 B Q-3 C Q-3 Q-3 A Q-3 B Q-3 C Q-4 C Q-4 Q-4 B Q-4 C Q-4 C Q-5 B Q-5 Q-5 C Q-5 C Q-5 A Q-6 B Q-6 Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-6 C Q-7 A Q-7 C Q-8 A Q-9A O-9B A Results: B Q-2 Q-3 B Q-4 A Q-5 B O-6 A B B B B Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 C C B B B Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 A A A B B Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-SB Results: Enhancement Potential Wetland has moderate potential for enhancement Education Wetland site is not appropriate for educational use �. Recreation Wetland has the potential to provide recreational activities Aesthetic Quality Wetland is considered to be pleasing Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Pacific Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Enhancement Education Recreation Aesthetic Potential Quality , Q A Q A Q A Q A Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet )epoe Bay Local Wetlands Lincoln County, Oregon 9/24/2003 Mare than one Cowardin class Herbaceous vegetation, no pondin, Less than 0.5 acres of onen water imary water source is groundwater Wetland does not flood or pond Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Wetland does not flood or pond Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream modified or isolated wetland Water not taken out No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited strea.ms One or more functions lost/not Primarv water source is �roun No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public Other habitats can be observed not accessed Unmaintained public access within 250 feet No boat launching can be developed No trails or viewin� areas e�st Two Cowardin classes visible >50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adj acent Water Q Adjacent land is p� Wetland buffer is PHS s NDB-1 1.97 PSS, PEM limited streams than 40% Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Adjacent land is primarily open space No adi acent Water Quality Limited streams Herbaceous vegetation, no ponding Develo�ment downslope of wetland of wetland �djacent land is jacent zoning is Herbaceous vee no Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% Potentiallv sensitive to future impac� Unmaintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is not limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No hunting is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Unpleasant odors are present sometimes Continuous traffic and natural noises occur Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) . Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife Fish Water Hydrologic Sensitivity Habitat Habitat Quality Control to Impact - Q A .Q A Q A Q A Q A Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A A Q-1 A Q-2 B Q-3 C Q-4 A Q-5 A Q-6 A A A A B A A A A Q-2 A Q-2 Q-3 A Q-3 Q-4 B Q-4 Q-5 C Q-5 Q-6 C Q-6 Q-7 B Q-1 A A Q-2 B B Q-3 C B Q-4 C A Q-5 C C Q-6 A C Results: Results: Enhancement Education Recreation Aesthetic Potential Quality Q A Q A Q A Q A Q-1 Q-1 C Q-1 C Q-1 A Q-2 Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-2 C Q-3 Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-3 C Q-4 Q-4 B Q-4 A Q-4 A Q-SB Q-5 C Q-5 B Q-5 A Q-6 Q-6 B Q-6 B Q-6 A Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Pacitic Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet )epoe Bay Local Wetlands Lincoln County, Oregon 9/30/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water 50% or more of stream is shaded Only portions of stream are modified >25% of stream has instream structures Primary water source is surface flow Wetland floods/ponds in growing season High wetland vesetation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplaix Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Minor restrictions slow down the water Stream modified or isolated wetland Water not taken out No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public Other habitats can be observed not accessed No access point to wetland exists No boat launching can be develope No trails or viewin� areas e�ust More than two Cowardin classes are visible Less than 25% of wetland can be seen Visual detractors nresent, can't be removed No adjacent Water Q Adjacent land is p� Wetland buffer is PHS s NDB-2 2.19 PFO limited streams than 40% No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Adjacent land is primarily open space Salmon and/or trout present in stream x:>�unc��.on:>a� inta�t::::::: :;::>::>:.;:.;:<;:::>:;.»::'>:< : <;>< :;;::;<:>:>::.; _. _. _ _. Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Adjacent land is primarily open space No adiacent Water Qualitv Limited streams Dominated of developn : of wetland 3jacent land is p1 ij acent zoning is Dominated bv w No access point to wetland e�sts Wetland is not limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides diverse wildlife habitat No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are nresent Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet PHS � Pacific Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife ' Fish Water Hydrologic Habitat Habitat Quality Control Q, A Q A Q: A Q A Q-1 A Q-1 A Q-1 C Q-1 B Q-2 A Q-2 B Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-3 B Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 B Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-4 B Q-4 B Q-5 A Q-5 C Q-5 A Q-5 A Q-6 A Q-6 B Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-7 A Q-7 C Q-8 C Q-9A O-9B A Results: Sensitivity to Impact C) , A Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 B C A A A Enhancement Education Recreation Aesthetic Potential Quality Q A Q A Q A Q' A Q-1 A Q-1 C Q-1 C Q-1 B Q-2 B Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-2 C Q-3 Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-3 B Q-4 B Q-4 A Q-4 B Q-4 B Q-SB A Q-5 C Q-5 B Q-5 A Q-6 B Q-6 A Q-6 B Q-6 A Date s of field work: 9/24/2003 Approx. Area (acres): 1.23 Onsite Assessment?: Yes Investigator(s): JVS/FS Wetland Location: Collins Road, at ed e of draina ewa Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Results: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet )epoe Bay Loca1 Wetlands Lincoln County, Oregon 9/24/2003 More than one Cowardi_n class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water 50% or more of stream is shaded Only portions of stream are modified >25% of stream has instream structures Primary water source is Wetland floods/ponds in Hi�h wetland ve�eta -ing season cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplaiY Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Minor restrictions slow down the water Stream not modified Water not taken out No adiacent Water Quality Limited streams Wetland functions are impacted or Primarv water source is �round No access allowed to wetla.nd No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats e�st No access point to wetland e�sts No boat launching can be develope� No trails or viewin� areas e�st Two Cowardin classes visible Less than 25% of wetland can be seen Visual detractors present, can be removed No adjacent Water Q Adjacent land is : Wetland buffer is PHS s NDB-3 1.23 PFO, PEM limited streams thau 40% No adj acent Water Quality Limited streams Adjacent land is mostly developed Warmwater fish present in stream , n as x�'pacted or d�g�rad�d Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Adjacent land is mostly developed No adi acent Water Qualitv Limited streams Dominated � vegetation �e of wetland of wetland Adjacent land is mostl jacent zoning is primar Dominated bv woodv Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% Potentiallv sensitive to future impac� No access point to wetland exists Wetland is limited mobilitv accessible t Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No hunting is allowed Wetland surrounded by landscaped areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are presen Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Invent Lincoln Countv, Ore�on Wetland PHS � Pacific Habitat Services, Inc. Jt�'et�a��f`r�. ..; SDB-1 s): I PFO, PEM Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 B Q-3 C Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-3 C Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-4 B Q-4 C Q-4 C Q-5 A Q-5 A Q-5 C Q-S A Q-5 C Q-6 A Q-6 C Q-6 C Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-7 A Q-7 C Q-8 A Q-9A Q-9B A Results: Results: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet fepoe Bay Local Wetlands Lincoln County, Oregon 9/24/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of ot�en water 25-50% of stream is shaded Stream is in a natural channel >25% of strearn has instream structures Primary water source is surface flow Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No �diacent W�ter Qualitv Limited streams Wetland functions are impacted ar degra Primary water source is surface flow Flow into wetland is not restricted No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public Other habitats can be observed not accessed No access point to wetland e�sts No boat launching can be developed Maintained trails, viewine areas exist Two Cowardin classes visible Less than 25% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adjacent Water Q Adjacent land is p� Wetland buffer is PHS � SDB-1 1.60 PFO, PEM limited streams than 40% No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Adj acent land is primarily open space Stream does not contain fish Surface water connection to other wetlands Adjacent land is primarily open space No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams Dominated by � en space downs �jacent land is pl ijacent zoning is Dominated bv �� of developn � of wetland �re Wetland is less thar� 0.5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% Potentiallv sensitive to future impac No access point to wetland exists Wetland is not limited mobility accessible `':�`��><<`>>:<::::><;<:>:::::;;< ::> ��Q�: �rQ��d� re� �pr��rt��t� Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Traffic noise and no natural noises Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 B Q-3 B Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-4 A Q-4 C Q-4 C Q-5 A Q-5 A Q-5 C Q-5-: A Q-5 A Q-6 A Q-6 A Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-6 A Q-7 A Q-7 C Q-8 A Q-9A Q-9B A Results: Results: Due to diverse wildlife habitat, this wet�and cannot be enhanced Wetland has potential for educational use Wetland provides recreational opportunities Wetland is considered to be moderatelv nleasin� Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Paci�c Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Loca1 Wetlands In Lincoln County, 9/30/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water 50% or more of stream is shaded Stream is in a natural channel >25% of stream has instream structures :»::>::>::: >�:>:::>:«>. ::;::: ;;:i::i':::::':;'; . ::::<:;;:�<'�:��:::�:::v��:t�x-:.. ��a€ �� ::>i :.::�:.: :.:::::.�::. Primary water source is groundwater Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adi acent Water Qualitv Limited streams Wetland access by landowner permiss No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats e�st Maintained public access within 250 feet No boat launching can be developed Maintained trails, viewing areas exist Two Cowardin classes visible Less than 25% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adj acent Water Qu Adj acent land is pri Wetland buffer is ; PHS � SDB-2 1.90 PFO itv limited streams than 40% No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Adj acent land is primarily open space � Salmon and/or trout present in stream ;:'s�s:;Y:i.:::::'>:::':;'::::''::.''::;:;::: ��:;i': �';':�::i:::::i::i:::>�:,,,:;;::.,i'::;:::' :$>:;:::::::::2:::::;:;::::::::::;:;:i::::: A:::E � r . ��(�::::»�<:�»:>:::::::»:<:::>:::<::_::>::>::>::::>�::::» .::::: �.::: � p��e��d:::o�.::��g�'a! :::.: : ::::: ::.:.>:.:: ::.: .::.::.: .;:«::.;::: .:::::. :: ::: Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Adjacent land is primarily open space No adiacent Water Quality Limited streams Dominated of wetland of wetland �djacent land is j acent zoning is Dominated bv t Maintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is not limited mobility accessible Wetland provides diverse wildlife habitat No fishing is allowed � No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic andnatural noises axe present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A O-9B A B C A A A C B Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 B Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-4 A Q-4 A Q-4 A Q-5 A Q-5:; . A Q-5 A Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-6 A O-7 A Results: Results: Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Pacifie Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition �.��sment Answers: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Local Wetlands In Lincoln County, Oreg� 10/10 & 1Of23/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less thaz10.5 acres of open water Yrimary water source is Wetland floods/ponds in HiQh wetland ve�eta PHS � R'C-lA 7.90 PSS, PFO, PEM No adjacent Water Qualiry limited streams Adjacent land is mostly developed Wetland buffer is between 10% and 40°i, uldwater Wetland is greater than 5 acres �ing season Ad}acent land is mostly developed cover No adiacent Water Quality Limited streams Wetland is not within 100 year floodplair Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Flow out of wetland is restricted Stream not madified Water not taken out No adjacent Water Quality Limited strearns >:<::<:::> �?��YI� d:::��:::�;Qd��ra#e One or more functions lostlnot present Primarv water source is �roundwater Wetland access Uy landowner permission No visible hazards to public Other habitats can be observed not accessed No access point to wetland exists No boat launching can be developf No trails or viewin� areas e�st More than two Cowardin classes are visible >50% of wetland can be seen Visual detractors present, can't be removed Dominated by woody vegetation �evelopment downslope of wetland of wetland Adjacent land is mostly devel acent zoning is primarily devf Dominated by woodv ve�eta Wetland is greater than 5 acres Wetland buffer is between 10% and 40°/o Potentially sensitive to future impacts No access point to wetland exists Wetland is not limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by development Natural odors present at wetland Continuous traffic and natural noises occur Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A C B C B B A A C�7 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-2 B Q-2 B Q-2 B Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-4 A Q-4 C Q-4 C Q-5 C Q-5 - C Q-5 A Q-6 C� Q-6 C Q-6 C O-7 A Results: Results: Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Pacific Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: � Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Local Wetlands Lincoln County, Ore 10/2/03. 10/16/03 More than one Cowardin class Herbaceous vegetation, no pondin Less than 0.5 acres of open water Primary water source is groundwa Can't determine if wetland floods or Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Can't determine if wetland floods or ponds Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams One or more functions lost/not Primary water source is �roun Wetland access by landowner permiss: No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats exist Unmaintained public access within 250 feet No boat launching can be developed No trails or viewin� areas exist More than two Cowardin classes are visible >50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adj acent Water Q Acijacent land is p� Wetland buffer is PHS � WC-1B 0.3 (approximate PSS, PEM, PFO limited streams than 40% Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Adjacent land is primarily open space No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams Herbaceous �djacent land is j acent zoning is Herbaceous ve� n, no ponam€ of developm� �e of wetland a no Wetland is greater than 5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% Potentially sensitive to future impac Unmaintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is not limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No hunting is allowed , , t:>:ta ��..�� ......... ..... ..._ ............ . .: .......: Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edirion, April 1996) •1 i Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A Q-9B Results: Results: Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Name: D oe ocation: Lmcoln A C C A A A A Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 A Local Wetlands B A B C C Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 B C C A A C Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 PHS � Pacil3c Habitat Services, Inc. Wetland: - WC-2 �(sl: PSS B C C A A Function �nd Condition Assessment Answers: . Wild�zf�„ ' Fish „` , Water Flydrologic ° Serisitivity Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet ' Depoe Bay Local Wetlands In Lincoln County, Oregon 11/29/03 � �� `,�� Wetland�provYdes One Cowardin class with > 5 speci� Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water Primary water source is groundwa Can't determine if wetland floods or i High wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Can't determine if wetland floods or ponds �Tater has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adiacenY Water Oualitv Limited streams One or more functions lost/not Primarv water source is Qroun No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public . Other habitats can be observed not accessed '"` No access oint to wetland exists ionale:; No boat launching can be develo e _ No trails or viewin� areas exist One Cowardin class is visible tionale:=,; Less than 25% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present PHS s WC-2 0.36 PSS No adjacent Water Qi Adj acent land is pr Wetland buffer is limited streams than 40% Surface water connection to other wetlands Adjacent land is primarily open space No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Dominated � vegetation �e of wetland of wetland .djacent land is pri� acent zoning is pri Dominated bv wc Wetland is less than 0.5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% otentiallv sensitive to future imnact No access point to wetland exists Wetland is not limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Continuous traffic and natural noises occur Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A Results: Results: A C C A A A C : Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 B Q-3 A Q-3 B Q-3 C Q-4 B Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-5 A Q-5�= A Q-5 A Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-6 A O-7 A Wetland has moderate poter. Wetland site is not appropri� Wetland has the potential to Wetland is considered to be tial for enhancement �te for educational use provide recreational activities Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Paci�c Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition �Assessment Answers: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Local Wetlands In Lincoln County, 10/2/2003 Mare than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water Prunary water source is Wetland floods/ponds in ; Hi�h wetland ve�eta PHS � WC-3 0.79 PSS, PEM No adjacent Water Quality limited streams Adjacent land is mostly deve�oped Wetland buffer is between 10% and 40% �recipitation Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres •owing season Adjacent land is mostly developed on cover No adiacent Water Qualitv Limited streams Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out �To adjacent Water Quality Limited streams , ,, : ...::. ..: ; ; >�?��i�� maod:��rat� (J�ie or more fuilctians l.ost/not present Primarv water source is precibitation No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats exist Maintained public access within 250 feet No boat launching can be developed No trails or viewin� areas exist Two Cowardin classes visible 25 - 50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present Dominated by woody vegetation Development downslope of wetland of wetland Adj acent land is acent zoning is � Dominated bv � Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Wetland buffer is between 10% and 40% Potentiallv sensitive to future impacts Maintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed i Wetland surrounded b� Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet PHS � Pacific Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife ' Fish Water Hydrologic Sensitivity Habitat Habitat Quality Control to Impact Q A Q' A Q A Q A_ Q A Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A A Q-2 B Q-3 A Q-4 A Q-5 A Q-6 A C C B Q-2 C Q-3 A Q-4 C Q-5 C 0-6 A Q-2 A Q-3 B Q-4 A Q-5 C Q-6 O-7 A Q-2 B C Q-3 C C Q-4 A A Q-5 A A Q-6 A A R�sults: Enhancement Education Recreation Aesthetic Potential Quality Q A Q A Q A Q A` Q-1 A Q-1 C Q-1 A Q-1 B Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-3 A Q-3 B Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-4 B Q-4 C Q-SB C Q-5 A Q-5 B Q-5 A Q-6 B Q-6 A Q-6 B Q-6 A Results. Enhancement Potential Wetland has moderate potential for enhancement Education Wetland site is not appropriate for educational use Recreation Wetland provides recreational opportunities Aesthetic Quality Wetland is not aesthetically pleasing ' Date s of field work: 10/2/2003 Approx: Area (acres): 0.40 Onsite Assessment?: : Yes Investigator(s)c JVS Wetland Location: North of Hidden Reach and Gull Station Streets in Little Whale Cove Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet )epoe Bay Loca1 Wetlands Lincoln County, Oregon 10/2/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Crreater than 1 acre of open water 25-50% of stream is shaded Only portions of stream are modified <10% of stream has instream structures Primary water source is surface flow Wetland floods/ponds in growing� season Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adi acent Water Oualitv Limited streams Wetland functions are impacted or degra Primary water source is surface flow Flow into wetland is not restricted No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats e�st Maintained p Boat lau Maintained access within 250 feet g within 1/2 mile . viewin� areas exist Two Cowardin classes visible Less than 25% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present PHS � WC-4 0.40 PEM, PSS No adjacent Water Quality limited streams Adjacent land is mostly developed Wetland buffer is less than 10% No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Adjacent land is mostly developed Stream does not contain fish Surface water connection to other wetlands Adjacent land is mostly developed No adiacent Water Quality Limited streams Dominated of wetland of wetland Adjacent land is m acent zoning is pri Dominated bv wo Wetland is less than 0.5 acres Wetland buffer is less than 10% tentially sensitive to future impa Maintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is limited mobility accessible ` ` <`° :�f�t�i: 'i: ,. ":<! :::i«:::::::!:::;::;:`:::::::::::«:::>:::::::`::::>:>::;:«::::<::<::; :::::::::::::>::: i�r�al`oppo t e�;: ::: ; .:::: .:.::: ::::. Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded b� Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, Aprii 1996) Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife Fish Water 'Hydrologic Se� Habitat Habitat Quality Control to` Q A Q, A Q A , Q : A` C Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A Results: A Q-2 A Q-3 C Q-4 A Q-5 A Q-6 A A n A Q-1 C Q-1 A Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-4 B Q-4 A Q-5 C Q-5 C Q-6 C Q-6 O-7 A A Q-2 B B Q-3 C C Q-4 C A Q-5 A A Q-6 A A Enhancement Education ' Recreation Aesthetic Potential Quality ' Q A Q A Q A Q A Q-1 Q-1 B Q-1 A Q-1 A Q-2 Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-2 A Q-3 Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-4 Q-4 A Q-4 A Q-4 A Q-SB Q-5 A Q-5 B Q-5 A Q-6 Q-6 A Q-6 B Q-6 A Results: Enhancement Potential Due to diverse wildlife habitat, this wetland cannot be enhanced Education Wetland has potential for educational use Recreation Wetland provides recreational opportunities Aesthetic Quality Wetland is considered to be pleasing Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Pacific Habitat Services, Lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Local Wetlands Lincoln County, 9/16/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water 50% or more of stream is shaded Stream is in a natural channel <10% of stream has instream structures Primary water source is Wetland floods/ponds in ; Hish wetland veseta No adj acent Water Q Adj acent land is p� Wetland buffer is PHS s WC-5 0.70 'EM, PSS, R, PFO limited streams than 40% No adj acent Water Quality Limited streams Adjacent land is primarily open space Stream does not contain fish �ndwater Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres ing season Adjacent land is primarily open space cover No adi acent Water Oualitv Limited streams Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Wetland floods/ponds in growing season Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams Wetland access by landowner permiss No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats exist Maintained public access within 250 feet No boat launching can be developed Maintained trails, viewinQ areas exist More than two Cowardin classes are visible >50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present Dominated by woody vegetation Development downslope of wetland of wetland 3jacent land is pri� �cent zoning is pri Dominated bv wo Maintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is limited mobilitv accessible Wetland pro� No No diverse wildlife habitat Zg is allowed ng is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Date s of field work: 11/21/2003 Approz. Area (acres): 0.36 : Onsite ASsessment?: No Investigator(s): HA Wetland Location: Whale Cove; south of McDonald, west of Interstate 5 Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife Fish Water Hydrologic Sensitivity , Habitat Habitat : Quality Control : to Impact � Q A Q A Q A Q A Q A � Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A Results: A Q-2 C Q-3 C Q-4 A Q-5 B Q-6 A A A A Q-2 B Q-2 A Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-5 C Q-5 C Q-6 C Q-6 Q-7 B Q-2 B C Q-3 C C Q-4 C A Q-5 A C Q-6 A C Enhancement Education 'Recreation ' Aesthetic PotentiaT Quality Q A Q A Q A Q A Q-1 B Q-1 C Q-1 C Q-1 B Q-2 B Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-2 B Q-3 Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-3 A Q-4 C Q-4 C Q-4 B Q-4 A Q-SB A Q-5 C Q-5 B Q-5 A Q-6 B Q-6 B Q-6 B Q-6 A Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Pxs � Pacific Habitat Services, lnc. Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Results: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet )epoe Bay Local Wetlands In Lincoln County, Oregon 11/21/2003 One Cowardin class with > 5 species Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of onen water 50% or more of stream is shaded Stream is in a natural channel >25% of stream has instream structures Yrunary water source is groundwater ale;,, Can't deternune if wetland floods or po� _ Hieh wetland vegetation cover Result: > i�4�etla�dts h�dr€►In 'c conti Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Rationale: Can't determine if wetland floods or ponds Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adi acent Water Qualitv Limited streams One or more functions lostlnot Primarv water source is groun No access allowed to wetland nale: No visible hazards to public No access or observation of other habitats vvett��u �s rtnt.�ppropr» No access point to wetland e�sts No boat launching can be develope No trails or viewin� areas e�st Two Cowardin classes visible 25 - 50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adjacent Water Q Adjacent land is p� Wetland buffer is PHS � WC-6A 0.36 PSS, PFO limited streams y open space ;r than 40% No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Adjacent land is primarily open space Stream does not contain fish Isolated from other wetlands Adjacent land is primarily open space No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams Dominated 3jacent land is pri� �cent zoning is pri Dominated bv wo of developn - of wetland C Wetland is less than 0.5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% Potentially sensitive to future impaci No access point to wetland e�sts Wetland is not limited mobility accessible _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. �o� provide rec. �pparfu;uitr�s ;: Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Project Name: De oe Ba Local Wetlands Invent� Proiect Location: Lincoln Countv. Ore�on WetIand PHS � Pacifc Habitat Services, lnc. Wetland: WC-6B (s): PFO Q-2 A Q-2 A Q-2 B Q-2 B Q-2 B Q-3 C Q-3 A Q-3 A Q-3 B Q-3 C Q-4 C Q-4 A Q-4 B Q-4 C Q-4 C Q-5 A Q-5 A Q-5 C Q-5 A Q-5 A Q-6 B Q-6 C Q-6 C Q-6 C Q-6 A Q-7 A Q-7 C Q-8 A Q-9A � Q-9B A Results: Results: Enhancement Education Recreation Aesthetic Potential Quality Q A Q A Q A Q A Q-1 B Q-1 C Q-1 C Q-1 B Q-2 B Q-2 A Q-2 C Q-2 B Q-3 Q-3 A Q-3 C Q-3 A Q-4 B Q-4 C Q-4 B Q-4 A Q-SB A Q-5 C Q-5 B Q-5 A Q-6 B Q-6 B Q-6 B Q-6 A Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Wildlife Fish Water Iiydrologic Sensitivity Habitat Habitat Quality - Control to Impact n e n e n e n e n s Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Local Wetlands Lincoln County, C 11/21/2003 One Cowardin class with > 5 speci� Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of open water SO% or more of stream is shaded Stream is in a natural channel >25% of stream has instream structures Primary water source is groundwa Can't determine if wetland floods or Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover Wetland is not within 100 year floodplain Can't determine if wetland floods or ponds Water has unrestricted flow out of wetland Stream not modified Water not taken out No adiacent Water Qualitv Limited streams One or more functions lost/not present Primarv water source is �roundwater No access allowed to wetland No visible hazards to public No access or observation of other habitats No access point to wetland exists No boat launching can be develope No trails or viewing areas exist Two Cowardin classes visible 25 - 50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adjacent Water Qu Adj acent land is pri Wetland buffer is s PHS s WC-6B 0.54 PFO limited streams than 40% No adjacent Water Quality Limited streams Adjacent land is primarily open space Stream does not contain fish Wetland is between 0.5 and 5 acres Adjacent land is primarily open space No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams Dominated of developn : of wetland �djacent land is j acent zoning is Dominated bv Wetland is lietween 0.5 and 5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% Potentiallv sensitive to future imvac No access point to wetland exists Wetland is not limited mobility accessible �ot prov� � rec opportu��ti�s : : _ Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntinQ is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are present Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology (Revised Edition, April 1996) Wetland Assessment Summary Sheet Local Wetlands Lincoln County, Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 Q-7 Q-8 Q-9A Results: Results: A S C B B A C A Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 Q-6 C A C A C Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 - Q-6 O-7 B C C A A A A Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Q-5 A C A A A PHS � Paci�c Habitat Services, lnc. WC-7 PSS. PEM Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Function and Condition Assessment Answers: Oregon Freshwater Wetland Assessment Methodology . Functions and Conditions Summary Sheet Local Wetlands Lincoln County, ( 10/ 10/2003 More than one Cowardin class Dominated by woody vegetation Less than 0.5 acres of ot�en water imary water source is precipitat Wetland does not flood or pond Hi�h wetland ve�etation cover VVetland is not within 100 year flood Wetland does not flood or pond Flow out of wetland is restricted Stream modified or isolated wetland Water is taken out or isolated wetland No adiacent Water Qualitv Limited streams One or more functions lost/not present Primarv water source is nrecinitation Wetland access by landowner permissi No visible hazards to public Public access to other habitats e�st Maintained public No boat launchir Maintained trails access within 250 feet i� can be developed areas exist Mare than two Cowardin classes are visible >50% of wetland can be seen No visual detractors are present No adjacent Water Q Adj acent land is : Wetland buffer is PHS s WC-7 0.27 PSS, PEM itv limited streams than 40% Isolated from other wetlands Adjacent land is mostly developed No adiacent Water Oualitv Limited streams Dominated >e of wetland of wetland Adjacent land is m acent zoning is pri Dominated bv wo Wetland is less than 0.5 acres Wetland buffer is greater than 40% 'otentiallv sensitive to future impaci Maintained public access within 250 feet Wetland is not limited mobilitv accessible Wetland provides habitat for some wildlife No fishing is allowed No huntin� is allowed Wetland surrounded by natural areas Natural odors present at wetland Some traffic and natural noises are px ; ,. , : IN wl .� :1 ` : . � 1 ,: i, • ,; �` i; �I�`: . . i� ,, 1 _I I; . . = � r-� �J Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated as significant if the answer to any of the criteria below is "Yes". _ 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b) Exclusion criteria satisfied? landatory Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : This wetland is locally ignificant if "Yes" is the answer to any of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact ? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat_ function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Wetland criteria sa )ptional Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : local gavernments may dentify a wetland as significant if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? Wetland criteria satisfied ? -� -� -� -� -� ��l� _ + No No No No -� -� - �' No No �� No No ` Does not satisfy the criteria, Not a Locally Significant Wetland ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS s Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � Project Name: Depoe Bay Local Wetlands Inventory Wetland: NDB-2 Project Location: Lincoln County, Oregon Approx. Area (acres); 2.19 Date: 9/30/2003 Wetland Types(s): PFO Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated'as significant if the answer to any of the criteria below is "Yes". _ 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment,.cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazazd 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b) Exclusion criteria satisfied? �Iandatory Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : This wetland is locally ignificant if "Yes" is the answer to any of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact ? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as tfireatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct sur�ace water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Mandatorv Locallv Si�nificant Wetland criteria satisfied ? Optional Locally Significant Wetland Criteria :1oca1 governments may identify a wetland as significant if "Yes" is the answer' to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? i�nificant Wetland criteria satisf ed ? _� -� -� -� �� -� � Yes Yes Yes No _� -� -�� No Yes - �• No No Locally Significant Wetland Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria ORS 197.279 (3)(b) answer to any of the criteria below is "Yes". 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from imgation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as ner the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria satisfied? Mandatory Loeally Significant Wetland Criteria : This wetland is locally si�nificant if "Yes" is the answer to anv of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact ? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant connmunity? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habztat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Mandatorv Locallv Si�nificant Wetland criteria satisfii Optional Locally Significant W identifv a wetland as si�nificar Criteria : local governments may t if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? O�tional Locallv Si�nificant VVetland criteria satisfied ? PHS � -� -� -� -� -� -� �-� -� �- -� - �' -� � •� -� �-� ��- -� No No Locally Significant Wetland I Exclusions : This wetland cannot be desi�nated as si�nificant if the ( Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as ner the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria satisfied? 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's f sh habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted o� degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat_ function intact, or impacted or degraded ? t Wetland criteria satisfied ? 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat foY some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, o� impacted or deg water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? —� �—� —� —�� No No , .:l�T� No Yes Yes No No No No �— No —� No t Wetland criteria satisfied ? ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, fann watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria satisfied? 1 Does the wetland provide diverse u��ildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted o� degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's f sh habitat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Man 1 � Wetland criteria satisfied ? Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? t Wetland criteria satisfied ? - �` -� -� -� No No ,; �v Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes �� -� No ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as ner the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria sa 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact? � 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic contYOl function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted o� degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Mandato Wetland criteria satisfied ? 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides dive�se wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, oY impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? Ontional Locallv Si�nificant Wetland criteria satisfied ? �-� -� -� -� -� � Yes No No No -� '-� '�-� No -� No ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as ner the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat_function intact, or impacted o� degraded ? Manda � Wetland criteria satisf ed ? 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or� degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, oY i�npacted o� degYaded hydYOlogic cont�ol function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and -� -� -� -� -� � No No No No • I, -� -�' No -�I does the wetland provide educational uses ? No � Optional Locallv Si�nificant Wetland criteria sat�isfied ? . r��T�i ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � Locally Significant VVetlands Criteria Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated as significant if the , answer to any of the criteria below is "Yes". 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treahnent, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b) Exclusion criteria satisfied? landatory Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : This wetland is locally igni�cant if "Yes" is the answer to any of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality functaon intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact ? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Ts the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat function intact. or imnacted or degraded ? Wetland Dptional Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : local governments may identify a wetland as significant if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland nrovide educational uses ? Wetland criteria satisfied ? -� i-� -� -� � �I No No No No No No -� -� -� No No �0l No No Does not satisfy the criteria, Not a Locally Significant Wetland ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS s. Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria L Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, fartn watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Egclusion criteria 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitatfunction intact? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened.or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Mandato t Wetland criteria satisfied ? 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded wateY quality function or has a intact, oY impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and —� — !• -- -- —� No Yes Yes � � • —� I—� !� —� does the wetland provide educational uses ? �_ � No — ; Ontional Locallv Si�nificant Wetland criteria satisfied ? l�a ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated as significant if the answer to any of the criteria below is "Yes". 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b) Exclusion criteria satisfied? landatory Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : This' wetland is locally , ignificant if "Yes" is the answer to any of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant commututy? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat_ function intact, or ampacted or degraded ? criteria satisfied ? Optional Locally Significant Wetland Criteria,:localgovernments may identify a wetland as significant if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some specaes or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality functaon or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or orgaruzation and does the wetland urovide educational uses ? al Lo t Wetland criteria satisfied ? -� -� -� -� -� No No Yes Yes No No -0 -� -� Yes � -� No No Locally Significant Wetland ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS s. Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated`as significant if the answer to any of the criteria"below is "Yes". 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: . a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created uruntentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria satisfied? Locally Significant Wetla if "Yes" is the answer to : This wetland is locally ofthe criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact ? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fsh habitat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Mandato ! Locally Sign a wetland as Wetland criteria satisfied governments may if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or ampacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or ampacted or degraded hydrologac control function , 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? t Wetland criteria satisfied ? -� -� -� -� -� -�' �-� � ; :�- �-� -� �- • I �� -� -� � • - -� No No Locally Significant Wetland ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS s Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria ORS 197.279 (3)(b) answer to anv of the criteria below is "Yes". 1 Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e, created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water; or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria sa Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : This wetiand is locally if "Yes" is the answer to anv of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic contr-o1 function intact ? 5 Is the wetland Iess than I/4 miie from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or zmpacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habftat fi�nction intact. or impacted or de�-aded ? Wetland Criteria : a wetland as si ant Wetland criteria sa local governments may if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a local�y unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some species or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intacZ, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educatianal uses ? t Wetland criteria satisfied ? PHS s -� -� -� -� -� -� �� I -� �- - ! -� -� -� -� �� -� No No Locally Significant Wetland �Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated as significant if the � Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria ORS 197.279 (3)(b) Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, sediment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances, materials or wastes as per the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b satisfied? Mandatory Locally Significant Wetland Criteria : This wetland is locally si�nificant if "Yes" is the answer to any of the criteria below. 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact ? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact ? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's f sh habitat function intact, or impacted or de,gr ? Wetland criteria satisfied ? : local governments may a wetland as si�nificant if "Yes" is the answer to the criteria below 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat or habitat for some specaes or has a intact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and does the wetland provide educational uses ? Wetland criteria satisfied ? PHS s -� -� -� -� -� -� �-� -� �- -� -� -� -� -� -� ��- -� No No ' Locally Significant Wetland I Exclusions : This wetland cannot be designated as significant if the I answer to:any of the criteria below is "Yes". Locally Significant Wetlands Criteria Is this wetland artificially created entirely from upland and: a. created for the purpose of controlling, storing, or maintaining stormwater b. is used for active surface mining or as a log pond c. is a ditch without a free and open connection to natural waters of the state d. is less than 1 acre and created unintentionally from irrigation or construction e. created for the purpose of wastewater treatment, cranberry production, farm watering, secliment settling, cooling industrial water, or a golf hazard 2 Is the wetland or portion of the wetland contaminated by hazardous substances. materials or wastes as ner the conditions of ORS 141-86-350 1(b Exclusion criteria sa 1 Does the wetland provide diverse wildlife habitat ? 2 Is the wetland's fish habitat function intact ? 3 Is the wetland's water quality function intact? 4 Is the wetland's hydrologic control function intact? 5 Is the wetland less than 1/4 mile from a water body listed by DEQ as a water quality limited water body (303(d) list) and is the wetland's water quality function intact, or impacted or degraded ? 6 Does the wetland contain a rare plant community? 7 Is the wetland inhabited by any species listed federally as threatened or endangered, or state listed as sensitive, threatened or endangered? 8 Does the wetland have a direct surface water connection to a stream segment mapped by ODFW as habitat for indigenous anadromous salmonids and is the wetland's fish habitat function intact, or impacted or degraded ? Mandato Wetland criteria satisfied ? 1 Does the wetland represent a locally unique native plant community and provides diverse wildlife habitat oY habitat for some species or has a zntact, or impacted or degraded fish habitat function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded water quality function or has a intact, or impacted or degraded hydrologic control function . 2 Is the wetland publicly owned and used by a school or organization and -� -� -� -� -� No No No No Yes -� -� ��-�� No -� does the wetland provide educational uses ? No Optional Locallv Si�nificant Wetland criteria satisfied ? '''Nt� ORS 197.279 (3)(b) PHS � �� µ.; �; N •� r :� � = � � ;1 , . ;Is �� r�� ,, �, ¢ . f � Depoe Bay Tax Lots with Riparian Corridors �Ri arianCode s ? Location =; �' Tax'Y:o"t s ,. , _;� � , .,` ��, �� R-NDB-1 _ 09-11-OS 200 09-11-OS-B 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1117, 1119, 1121, 1123 09-11-OS 200 09-11-OS-DC 6900 R-NDB-2 09-11-OS-DD 100, 105, 300, 301, 1900 09-11-08-AA 300, 302, 401, 403, 409, 410, 411, 1501, 2400, 2500 09-11-08-AB 100, 101, 400, 4600, 6100, 6200 R-NDB-3 9-11-OS-DC 200, 900, 1000, 1100, 1101, 1102, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2200, 2300, 4000, 4100 1800, 3800, 4000, 4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, 5200, R-NDB-4 9-11-08-AB 5300, 5400, 5500, 5600, 5700, 5800, 6000, 6100, 6200, 7600, 7700, 7900 09-11-OS-DD 1100 R-SDB-1 09-11-08 101 09-11-08-AA 1401, 1900, 2000, 2001, 2800, 2900, 3000 09-11-08-AC 942 R-SDB-2 09-11-08-AB 600 09-11-08-AC 101, 200, 201, 942 09-11-08 400 R-SDB-3 09-11-08-CA 2900, 3000, 3200, 3300, 3400, 3401, 7300, 8300, 8400 09-11-17-DB 1200 09-11-08-CA 4200, 4201, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800, 5000, 5100, 5700, 5900, 6000 R-WC-1 09-11-08-CC 103, 104, 107, 108, 115, 128, 608, 90000, 90008, 90009, 90010, 90011, 90012 09-11-08-CD 100, 200, 300, 301 . 09-11-17-BB 107, 115 09-11-08-CC 90000, 90001, 90002, 90003, 90003, 90004, 90005, 90006, 90007, 90012, 90013, 90014 116, 1000, 1100, 1200, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, R-WC-2 09-11-17-BB 2200, 2300, 2400, 2500, 2600, 2800, 2900, 3000, 3100, 3200, 3300, 4100 09-11-17-BC 3000, 3100, 3200, 3201, 3300, 3400, 3500, 3600, 3700, 3800, 3900, 4000, 4100, 4200, 4300, 7600 09-11-18-AD 500, 600, 700, 800 2300, 2400, 4400, 4500, 4600, 4700, 4800, 4900, 5000, R-WC-3 09-11-17-BC 5100, 5200, 200, 6300, 6400, 6500, 6600, 6700, 7300, 7400 09-11-18-AD 800 WC-4a 09-11-17-CB 300, 400 WC-4b 09-11-17-CB 400 Riparian Characterization Form PHS s . Date: 10/23/2003 On-site: ❑ Investigators: Off-Site: ❑x JVS/CR Riparian Code: R-NDB-1 Reach Length: 1800' Hydrologic Basin: North Depoe Bay Creek Water Resource: Stream/River: x Lake/Pond• Wetland: LWI Wetland Code: Width: 5 feet Width: feet Width: feet Water present year-round: Yes � No ❑ Are salmonids present in the adjacent water resource? Is the water resource listed for temperature on DEQ's 303(d) list: Yes ❑ No ❑x Yes ❑ No 0 Within FEMA-mapped 100-year floodplain: Yes � No � Mapped soil series: Neskowin-Salander silt loam, 35-60% slopes AdjaCent Land Uses? (Check as many as needed) Agriculture: ❑ Roads: � CommerciaVIndus.: ❑ Undeveloped: ❑ Residential: � Forestry: 0 Woody vegetation Herbaceous vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines >1 meter) (include tY'ees, shrubs, vines <1 meter) Alnus rubra Dactylis glomerata Picea sitchensis Tanacetum vulgare Gaultheria shallon Polystichum munitum Abies grandis Equisetum arvense Rubus discolor 1 meter = 3.2 feet Average slope in the riparian area: (Quesrion 1) <10:1 (10%) ❑ Between 10:1 (10%) and 5:1 (20%) � >5:1 (20%) ❑ Extent of impervious surface within the riparian area. (Question 4) <10% ❑x 10% - 25% ❑ >25% 0 Is the reach constricted by man-made features? (Question s} Yes ❑ No ❑x Does the orientation of the riparian area allow for shading of the water resource at midday in summer? (Quesrion 9) Yes 0 No ❑ Dominant vegetation layer within riparian area? (Question lo) Woody vegetation 0 Herbaceous vegetation ❑ Bare ground ❑ Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? (Quesrions 11 & 14) Yes � No ❑ Large woody debris in riparian area? (Quesrion 15) Yes ❑ No ❑X Percent of water resource bordered by vegetated riparian area at least 30 feet wide? (Question 16) >40% � 10% -40% ❑ <10% ❑ Degree of development or human caused disturbance. (Question 19) <25% 0 25% - 75% ❑ >75% ❑ How does the NRCS soil survey rank water erosion hazard of the dominant mapped unit in the Riparian Area? (Question 5) low, slight moderate ❑ high, very high, severe 0 What is the dominant vegetation at the top of bank (if defined) or edge of water resource? (Question 3) Woody vegetation 0 Herbaceous vegetation ❑ Bare ground ❑ Are there flood prone areas (adjacent flat areas, depressions, swales, FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, etc.) beyond the top of bank or edge of the water resource? (Quesrion 6) Yes ❑ No x❑ Is woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high dominant in the flood prone riparian area? Yes ❑ No or no flood prone area present � How many vegetation layers (i.e. canopy, mid-story, graundcover) are present? More than 2 � 2 layers ❑ 1 layer or unvegetated ❑ Riparian Width Determination `�� ij RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-1 10/23/2003 Investigators: NS/CR Dominant tree species: Picea sitchensis (see other side for list of species) Potential tree height (PTH)/Actual Width of riparian area : 120 / feet (Width measured horizontally from edge of water resource) PTH determined by: On-site vegetation 0 Reference site ❑ Code Comments: An unnamed tributary to the Pacific Ocean that flows from the adjacent slopes, draining into Pirate Cove (Research Reserve). Inaccessible to the public, accessible from the ocean only. Cross Section: f-3'-► Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WATER QUALITY RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-1 1. What is the average slope in the riparian area? a. Less than 10:1 (10°/a) 3 pts b. Between 10:1 (10%) and 5:1 (20%) �� 2 pts c. Greater than 5:1 (20%) �� 1 pt 2. What is the dominant vegetation cover in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 2 pts c. Baxe ground 3. What is the dominant vegetation at the top of bank (if defined) 1 pt PHS s or edge of water resource? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high � 2 pts c. Bare ground � 1 pt 4. What is the extent of impervious surfaces within the riparian area? a. Less than 10% � 3 pts b. Between 10% and 25% W..w �� . �� W �� mm.. � . � µ �� 2 pts c. Greater than 25% 5. How does the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) soil survey rank the water erosion hazard of the dominant mapped unit in the riparian area? Select the highest water erosion hazard description if more than one is listed. a. Low, slight, moderate b. High, severe, very high Function: High (12 pts) Medium (8 pts) Low (5 pts) 1 pt 2 pts 1 pts Total Points: FUNCTION IS: Score 2 3 3 3 1 12 Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet FLOOD MANAGEMENT PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-1 6. Are there flood prone areas (adjacent flat areas, depressions, swales, FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, etc.) beyond the top of bank or edge of the water resource? a. Yes 3 pts b. No 1 pt 7. Is woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high dominant in the flood prone riparian area? a. Yes 3 pts b. No or no flood prone area present �� 1 pt 8. Is the stream or water resource constricted by man-made features (e.g. channelization, riprap, concrete wall)? a. No 3 pts b. Yes � w � 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (8-9 pts) Medium (5-7 pts) Low (3-4 pts) Score 1 1 3 5 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet THERMAL REGULATION PHS s RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-1 9. Does the aspect or orientation of the riparian area allow for shading of water at midday in the summer? a. Yes 3 pts b. No .._._.__....._____ _......�.__............__.____�_....__ 1 pt 10. What is the dominant vegetation layer in the riparian area? a. Wbody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high c. Bare ground Score 3 3 pts 2 pts 3 1 pt 11. Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? a. Yes 2 pts b. No -.. ____�...__�._....._ ...�'..._ 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (7-8 pts) Medium (5-6 pts) Low (3-4 pts) 2 . FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WILDLIFE HABITAT PHS s RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-1 12. How many vegetation layers (i.e. canopy, mid-story, groundcover) are present? a. More than 2layers 3 pts _�.__ _._..__ ...__. ..�.�.... ._�.... � b. 2layers 2 pts c. 1 layer, or unvegetated i �� 1 pt 13. What is the dominant vegetation layer in the riparian area? a. Waody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high � 2 pts c. Bare ground 1 pt 14. Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? a. Yes b. No 15. Is large woody debris present within the riparian area? a. Yes b. No _..�. .._......__.� 16. What percent of the water resource edge is bordered by a vegetated riparian area at least 30 feet wide? a. Greater than 40% b. Between ld% and 40% � MN. � ..... � . � .. � �� c. Less than 10% � � � 2 pts 1 pt 3 pts 1 pt 3 pts 2 pts 1 pt Score 3 3 2 1 3 Questions continued on hext page Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WILDLIFE HABITAT (continued) 17. Is surface water present throughout the year? a. Yes �� b. No PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-1 Score 3 pts 1 pt 3 18. Is there more than one type of water resource (e.g. stream, wetland, lake/pond) within or immediately adjacent to the riparian reach? a. Yes 3 pts b. No � 1 pt 19. What is the degree of development or human-caused disturbance (e.g. buildings, impervious surfaces, lawns, agriculture, trash) in the riparian area? a. Less than 25% 3 pts b. Between 25% and 75% � 2 pts c. Greater than 75% �� 1 pt Total Points: Function: High (19-23 pts) Medium (13-18 pts) Low (8-12 pts) 1 3 19 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Characterization Form Riparian Code: Date: On-site: � Investigators: 9/30/2003 Off-Site: ❑ JVS/CR Reach Length: PHS s ��: 10,560' Hydrologic Basin: North Depoe Bay Creek Water Resource: Stream/River: x Width: 6-10 feet Lake/Pond: Width: feet Wetland: Width: feet LWI Wetland Code: NDB-2 , Water present year-round: Yes x❑ No ❑ Are salmonids present in the adjacent water resource? Yes 0 No ❑ the water resource listed for temperature on DEQ's 303(d) list: Yes ❑ No 0 Within FEMA-mapped 100-year floodplain: Yes � No ❑ Mapped soil series: Fendall-Templeton silt loam, 35-60% slopes Adjacent Land Uses? (Check as many as needed) Agriculture: ❑ CommerciaVIndus.: ❑x Residential: ❑ Roads: 0 Undeveloped: � Forestry: ❑ Woody vegetation Herbaceous vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines >1 meter) (include trees, shrubs, vines <1 meter) Alnus rubra Gaultheria shallon Picea sitchensis Rubus discolor Thuja plicata Polystichum munitum Tsuga heterophylla Rubus spectabilis Rubus discolor Ranunculus repens Sambucus racemosa Athyrium alix- emina Rubus spectabilis 1 meter = 3.2 feet Average slope in the riparian area: (Question 1) <10:1 (10%) ❑ Between 10:1 (10%) and 5:1 (20%) � >5:1 (20%) ❑ Extent of impervious surface within the riparian area. (Question 4) <10% � 10% -25% ❑ >25% ❑ Is the reach constricted by man-made features? (Question 8) Yes � No ❑ Does the orientation of the riparian area allow for shading of the water resource at midday in summer? (Quesrion 9) Yes � No ❑ Dominant vegetation layer within riparian area? (Question 10) Woody vegetation � Herbaceous vegetation ❑ Bare ground � Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? (Questions 11 & 14) Yes ❑x No ❑ Large woody debris in riparian area? (Quesrion 15) Yes 0 No ❑ Percent of water resource bordered by vegetated riparian area at least 30 feet wide? (Question 16) >40% � 10% -40% ❑ <10% ❑ Degree of development or human caused disturbance (Question 19) <25% ❑x 25% -75% ❑ >75% ❑ How does the NRCS soil survey rank water erosion hazard of the dominant mapped unit in the Riparian Area? (Question 5) low, slight moderate ❑ high, very high, severe � What is the dominant vegetation at the top of bank (if defiaed) or edge of water resource? (Question 3) Woody vegetation 0 Herbaceous vegetation ❑ Bare ground ❑ Are there flood prone areas (adjacent flat areas, depressions, swales, FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, etc.) beyond the top of bank or edge of the water resource? (Question 6) Yes ❑ No � Is woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high dominant in the flood prone riparian area? Yes ❑ No or no flood prone area present ❑x How many vegetation layers (i.e. canopy, mid-story, groundcover) are present? More than 2 � 2layers ❑ 1 layer or unvegetated ❑ Riparian Width Determination PHS s RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-2 Date: 9/30/2003 Investigators: JVS/CR Dominant tree species: Picea sitchensis (see other side for list of species) Potential tree height (PTH)/Actual Width of riparian area : 120 / feet (Width measured horizontally from edge of water resource) PTH determined by: On-site vegetation � Reference site ❑ Code Comments: Gravel road associated with water treatment plant along west side of stream on lower end of White property. Newly graded area "road" and fill along east bank of stream. Cross Section: Left (east ) west ern red ced ar Sitka spruce Red alder fill Himalaya blackberry Right (west g ravel road sword & ladyferns Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WATER QUALITY RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-2 1. What is the average slope in the riparian area? a. Less than 10:1 (10%) 3 pts b. Between 10:1 (10°/a) and 5:1 (20%) ��2 pts c. Greater than 5:1 (20%) 1 pt 2. What is the dominant vegetation cover in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high c. Bare ground 3. What is the dominant vegetation at the top of bank (if defined) nHS � 3 pts 2 pts 1 pt � or edge of water resource? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts' b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 2 pts c. Bare ground 1 pt 4. What is the extent of impervious surfaces within the riparian area? a. Less than 10% 3 pts b. Between 10% and 25%0 �� 2 pts c. Greater than 25% �� M �� 1 pt I 5. How does the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) soil survey rank the water erosion hazard of the dominant mapped unit in the riparian area? Select the highest water erosion hazard description if more than one is listed. a. Low, slight, moderate b. High, severe, very high 2 pts 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (12-14 pts) Medium (8-11 pts) Low (5-7 pts) Score 2 3 3 3 1 12 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet FLOOD MANAGEMENT 6. Are there flood prone areas (adjacent flat areas, depressions, swales, FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, etc.) beyond the top of bank or edge of the water resource? a. Yes b. No PHS � RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-2 Score � p t s II 1 P 7. Is woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high dominant in the flood prone riparian area? a. Yes 3 pts b. No or no flood prone area present 1 pt 8. Is the stream or water resource constricted by man-made features (e.g. channelization, riprap, concrete wall)? a. No 3 pts b. Yes � �� 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (8-9 pts) Medium (5-7 pts) Low (3-4 pts) 1 1 3 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet THERMAL REGULATION 9. Does the aspect or orientation of the riparian area allow for shading of water at midday in the summer? a . Yes _--___ .._...._...._ .�...__.___..............._.._.. b. No 10. What is the dominant vegetation layer in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high c. Bare ground 11. Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? a. Yes b. No �� PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-2 Score � p t s II 3 P 3 pts 2 pts 3 1 pt 2 pts 2 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (7 pts) Medium (5 pts) Low (3 pts) . FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WILDLIFE HABITAT PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-2 12. Aow many vegetation layers (i.e. canopy, mid-story, groundcover) are present? a. More than 2 layers 3 pts b. 2layers �� µ�� 2 pts c. 1 layer, or unvegetated � M �� u � � 1 pt 13. What is the dominant vegetation layer in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high c. Bare ground 14. Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? a. Yes b. No �� 15. Is large woody debris present within the riparian area? a. Yes b . No �_.�.._.....�..._..________...._. Score 3 3 pts 2 pts 3 1 pt 2 pts 2 1 pt 3 pts 3 1 pt 16. What percent of the water resource edge is bordered by a vegetated riparian area at least 30 feet wide? a. Greater than 40% 3 pts b. Between 10% and 40% � 2 pts c. Less than 10% µ�� ~ �� 1 pt 3 Questions continued on next page Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WILDLIFE HABlTAT (continued) 17. Is surface water present throughout the year? a. Yes b. No � 18. Is there more than one type of water resource (e.g. stream, wetland, lake/pond) within or immediately adjacent to the riparian reach? a. Yes b. No PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-2 Score 3 pts 1 pt 3 3 pts 1 pt I 19. What is the degree of development or human-caused disturbance (e.g. buildings, impervious surfaces, lawns, agriculture, trash) in the riparian area? a. Less than 25°/a 3 pts b. Between 25% and 75% �2 pts i c. Greater than 75% 1 pt I Total Points: Function: High (19-23 pts) Medium (13-18 pts) Low (8-12 pts) 1 3 21 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Characterization Form PHS s Date: On-site: � Investigators: ��;: 'y' } �s� > `bt'�:;a� �,�::�: Water Resource: LWI Wetland Code: 9/24/2003 Off-Site: ❑ JVS/FS Riparian Code: Reach Length: 500' Hydrologic Basin: North Depoe Bay Creek � �: Stream/River• x Lake/Pond• Wetland• x NDB-3 Width: 40 feet Width: feet Width: feet Water present year-round: Yes ❑x No ❑ Are salmonids present in the adjacent water resource? Yes ❑ No ❑x Is the water resource listed for temperature on DEQ's 303(d) list: Yes ❑ No � Within FEMA-mapped 100-year floodplain: Yes ❑ No � Mapped soil series: Nelscott loam, 3-12% slopes Adjacent LaItd Uses? (Check as many as needed) Agriculture: ❑ Roads: � CommerciaUIndus.: � Undeveloped: 0 Residential: ❑ Forestry: � Woody vegetation Herbaceous vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines >1 meter) (include trees, shrubs, vines <1 meter) Alnus rubra Heracleum lanatum Picea sitchensis Ranunculus repens Gaultheria shallon Equisetum sp. Rubus spectabilis Sparganium emersum Rubus discolor Scirpus microcarpus 1 meter = 3.2 feet Average slope in the riparian area: (Question 1) <10:1 (10%) ❑ Between 10:1 (10%) and 5:1 (20%) 0 >5:1 (20%} ❑ Extent of impervious surface within the riparian area. (Question 4) <10% 0 10% -25% ❑ >25% ❑ Is the reach constricted by man-made features? (Question 8) Yes x❑ No ❑ Does the orientation of the riparian area allow for shading of the water resource at midday in summer? (Quesrion 9) Yes � No ❑ Dominant vegetation layer within riparian area? (Question lo) Woody vegetation ❑x Herbaceous vegetation ❑ Bare ground ❑ Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? (Questions 11 & 14) Yes x❑ No ❑ Large woody debris in riparian area? (Question 15) Yes � No ❑ Percent of water resource bordered by vegetated riparian area at least 30 feet wide? (Question 16) >40% 0 10% -40% ❑ <10% � Degree of development or human caused disturbance. (Question 19) <25% ❑x 25% - 75% ❑ >75% ❑ How does the NRCS soil survey rank water erosion hazard of the dominant mapped unit in the Riparian Area? (Question 5) low, slight moderate � high, very high, severe ❑ What is the dominant vegetation at the top of bank (if defined) or edge of water resource? (Quesrion 3) Woody vegetation 0 Herbaceous vegetation ❑ Bare ground ❑ Are there flood prone areas (adjacent flat areas, depressions, swales, FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, etc.) beyond the top of bank or edge of the water resource? (Quesrion 6) Yes ❑ No � Is woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high dominant in the flood prone riparian area? Yes ❑ No or no flood prone area present � How many vegetation layers (i.e. canopy, mid-story, groundcover) are present? More than 2❑x 2layers ❑ 1 layer or unvegetated ❑ Riparian VVidth Determination Depoe Bay Riparian Inventory PHS s RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-3 Date: 9/24/2003 Investigators: NS/FS Dominant tree species: Alnus rubra ( see other side for list of species) Potential tree height (PTH)/Actual Width of riparian area : (Width measured horizontally from edge of water resource) ,PTH determined by: On-site vegetation ❑x Reference site ❑ Code 65 / feet Comments: Riparian wetland in forested ravine behind Childer's properiy, north of Collins Road. Forest logged upslope, within this stretch is palustrine, forested mosaic wetland within interwoven streams and islands of old Picea sitchensis sturrips. Cross Section: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WATER QUALITY PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-3 1. What is the average slope in the riparian area? a. Less than 10:1 (10%} 3 pts b. Between 10:1 (10%) and 5:1 (20%) �� 2 pts c. Greater than 5:1 (20%) � �� ~� 1 pt 2. What is the dominant vegetation cover in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less. than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high � 2 pts c. Bare ground 1 pt 3. What is the dominant vegetation at the top of bank (if defined) or edge of water resource? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high � 2 pts c. Bare ground � 1 pt 4. What is the extent of impervious surfaces within the riparian area? a. Less than 10% 3 pts b. Between 10% and 25% . �� . �� . � 1_ �� . � y �� 2 pts c. Greater than 25% � . ��^.�� 1 pt 5. How does the Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service) soil survey rank the water erosion hazard of the dominant mapped unit in the riparian area? Select the highest water erosion hazard description if more than one is listed. a. Low, slight, moderate 2 pts b. High, severe, very high �� 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (12-14 pts) Medium (8-11 pts) Low (5-7 pts) Score 2 3 3 3 � 13 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet FLOOD MANAGEMENT PHS s . RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-3 6. Are there flood prone areas (adjacent flat areas, depressions, swales, FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, etc.) beyond the top of bank or edge of the water resource? a. Yes 3 pts b. No � 1 pt 7. Is woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high dominant in the flood prone riparian area? a. Yes 3 pts b. No or no flood prone area present � 1 pt S. Is the stream or water resource constricted by man-made features (e.g. channelization, riprap, concrete wall)? a. No _ 3 pts b. Yes �� 1 pts Function: High (8-9 pts) Medium (5-7 pts) Low (3-4 pts) Score 1 1 1 Total Points: 3 �� FUNCTION IS ��,_ � Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet Depoe Bay Riparian Inventory THERMAL REGULATION 9. Does the aspect or orientation of the riparian area allow for shading of water at midday in the summer? a . Yes .. .._._�_._.._....___.____�.._.........�.._._.._ b. No PHS � RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-3 Score � p t s II 3 p 10. What is the dominant vegetation layer in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 3 pts b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high 2 pts c. Bare ground 1 pt 11. Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? a. Yes b. No 2 pts 1 pts Total Points: Function: High (7-8 pts) Medium (5-6 pts) Low (3-4 pts) 3 2 $ FUNCTION IS: Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet ;� �` , ; s �� . � � ; De oe Ba R� ari�n Tnvento �- �, . ,_,�_l� ��' � p � r`3' � WILDLIFE HABITAT PHS s RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-3 12. How many vegetation layers (i.e. canopy, mid-story, groundcover) are present? a. More than 2 layers 3 pts b. 2layers __. .__.._._,_.._.. �._.._...._._,.....____.,_..,_..._2 pts c. 1 layer, or unvegetated � Y �� 1 pt 13. What is the dominant vegetation layer in the riparian area? a. Woody vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines) greater than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high b. Herbaceous vegetation or woody vegetation less than 1 meter (3.2 feet) high c. Bare ground 14. Does woody vegetation hang over the edge of the water? a. Yes b. No � 15. Is large woody debris present within the riparian area? a. Yes b. No �` �� 16. What percent of the water resource edge is bordered by a vegetated riparian area at least 30 feet wide? a. Greater than 40% b. Between 10% and 40% Y �� c. Less than 10% Score 3 3 pts 2 pts 3 9 pt 2 pts 2 1 p# 3 pts 3 1 pt 3 pts 2 pts 1 pt 3 Questions continued oh nextpage Riparian Functional Assessment Answer Sheet WILDLIFE HABITAT (continued) RIPARIAN CODE R-NDB-3 17. Is surface water present throughout the year? a. Yes 3 pts b . No ._._...�. _____�._ ____...�. 1 pt 18. Is there more than one type of water resource (e.g. stream, wetland, lake/pond) within or immediately adjacent to the riparian reach? a. Yes b. No PHS s 3 pts 1 pt 19. What is the degree of development or human-caused disturbance (e.g. buildings, impervious snrfaces, lawns, agriculture, trash) in the riparian area? a. Less than 25% 3 pts b. Between 25% and 75% ` 2 pts c. Greater than 75% 1 pt Total Points: Function: High (19-23 pts) Medium (13-18 pts) Low (8-12 pts) Score 3 3 3 23 FUNCTION IS: Riparian Characterization Form , �, � ^ ekT V �r�e�`,"�iu`� tr��,�� : e�.�� s� ��?ro" i �� `� �; ��Depoe ��3a� �RY�arian �nven�fo � � , , r�Y , Riparian Code: Date: On-site: � Investigators: W,AT�R RESfIIJRCE Il` Water Resource: LWI Wetland Code: 9/24/2003 Off-Site: ❑ JVS/FS Reach Length: PHS s . �; , .11 Hydrologic Basin: North Depoe Bay Creek Stream/River: x Lake/Pond• Wetland• NDB-3 Width: Width: Width: Water present year-round: Yes � No � Are salmonids present in the adjacent water resource? Yes ❑ Is the water resource listed for temperature on DEQ's 303(d) list: feet feet feet 15 No 0 Yes ❑ No 0 Within FEMA-mapped 100-year floodplain: Yes ❑ No � Mapped soil series: � Nelscott loam, 3-12% slopes AdjaCerit Larid USes? (Check as many as needed) Agriculture: ❑ Roads: C! CommerciaUIndus.: ❑x Undeveloped: 0 Residential: ❑ Forestry: ❑ Woody vegetation Herbaceous vegetation (trees, shrubs, vines >i meter) (include trees, shrubs, vines <1 meter) Alnus rubra Polystichum munitum Sambucus racemosa Polygonum pachystachyum Gaultheria shallon Rubus spectabilis Rubus discolor 1 meter = 32 feet